Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: narby
I support the 2nd amendment as much as anyone. But in the game of real world politics, carrying as an attempt to “educate” I think is more likely to backfire and result in the end of open carry.

An attempt here in New Hampshire to pass a law allowing issuing authorities to deny concealed-carry licenses on the basis of "guilt by association" by changing about half a dozen words resulted in about 500 people turning out for the hearing, packing the hearing room and the halls of the statehouse.

In order to end open carry, they would have to repeal Article 2 and 2a of the State Constitution here, and they could probably expect about 50,000 people surrounding the statehouse for that hearing.

So "real world politics" in your state might be a bit different than the "real world politics" here in New Hampshire. And we will continue to open carry in spite of the threats from uneducated cops, to put an end to those threats.

93 posted on 08/07/2007 7:05:46 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: mvpel
So "real world politics" in your state might be a bit different than the "real world politics" here in New Hampshire.

People are people all over. If you irritate or scare enough of them they will do whatever it takes to end their fears.

Besides that fact, the political climate in NH is changing with the liberals moving up from Boston. They're looking for a nice quiet, safe, happy place live in and retire to. Poking them with a stick by carrying in the open might be an entertaining thing to do. But like poking a rattle snake here in AZ, it does no positive good and will eventually get you bit.

112 posted on 08/07/2007 7:58:32 AM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson