What is left out of reports from Hebron

Zionist.com ^

[RyanJones]

The Israeli and international medias are abuzz with reports out of Hebron regarding yesterday’s forced removal of two Jewish families from an old wholesale market building they took over outside of the tiny defined Jewish area of the biblical town.

Nearly every report I have read makes it sound as though these families invaded an active market and evicted the poor Arabs who were trying to do business there. The truth, however, is that this particular market has been abandoned for over 13 years. The Jewish families in question moved into an empty building adjacent to the present-day Avraham Aveinu neighborhood.

[robertpaulsen]

"Why do these Jews keep trying to take up residence in what is dilapidated and probably very unsanitary old building? Because it belongs to them."

Them? Personally? I don't think so. That sounds a lot like today's blacks wanting reparations for the slavery of their ancestors.

"... right up until 1929, when Hebron’s Arabs massacred many of the neighborhood’s residents in the most brutal manner."

Well, with 500 Jews in Hebron surounded by 150,000 Arabs, I'd say they're tempting fate yet again.

[Yehuda]

“Well, with 500 Jews in Hebron surounded by 150,000 Arabs, I’d say they’re tempting fate yet again.”

Hmm, what about the 5 million Jews surrounded by 150,000,000 million arabs...

Oh wait, I forgot, you think the Jews should leave all of Israel anyway and let the ARABS SCUMMIFY TO THE REST OF ISRAEL AS THEY DID TO GAZA.

Sometimes I forget which I find more absurd and revolting: jihadi sand-nazis, their leftwing vermin allies, or the silver-tongued, Jew-hating paleo-poseurs who share the other’s goals lunatic paranoia and goals.

Here’s your sign: “Hey Jihadi, don’t hurt me, I ROOTED FOR YOU TO DESTROY ISRAEL!”

[Yehuda]

PS - re your repulsive and nonsensical attempt to link Jewish rights to their land to the reparations movement, (wonder if you ever compare the so-called pali "right of return" to "reparations") here's what you conveniently left off from your excerpt:

"Most are aware that the British rulers of the area then evacuated the rest of Hebron’s Jews “for their own safety,” but failed to prevent the town’s Arabs from taking over their property. These properties were originally Jewish owned, and were stolen by the Arabs after they had violently removed the Jews from their midst.

But leave it those arrogant Arab criminals to not bother to alter the property registrations, secure in the knowledge that the international community would always take their side against the Jews (remember, this was right before the start of the Nazi Holocaust, when global hatred of the Jews was at a peak).

Amazingly, the property in this part of Hebron was still registered to its original Jewish owners when Jordan illegally occupied the area in 1948. And Jordan didn’t bother to change the records, either! The Jordanians simply listed the property under the Custodian for Enemy Property, a label Israel shockingly continues to apply to the real estate in question."