Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coulter: Absolutely fabulist
JewishWorldReview.com ^ | 8/8/07 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 08/08/2007 2:18:44 PM PDT by JWR_Editor

In their latest demonstration of how much they love the troops, liberals have produced yet another anti-war hoax.

(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2008election; anncoulter; beauchamp; canyousaygenghis; coulter; danrathered; defeatocrats; democrats; drivebymedia; hoax; iraqwar; iraqwarhoax; jewishworldreview; kinkos; liberalism; liberalliars; libs; losintheirshirts; lovethetroopsyabet; mediabias; msm; newrepublic; nextjohfkinkerry; pajamahadeen; thomasbeauchamp; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-81 next last

1 posted on 08/08/2007 2:18:46 PM PDT by JWR_Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor

“The New Republic has gone mad. Perhaps the magazine brought its former employee, fantasist Steven Glass, out of retirement. It’s long past time for The New Republic to file for intellectual Chapter 7. Arthur Andersen was implicated in fewer frauds.”

LOL!!


2 posted on 08/08/2007 2:21:45 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor
Annie Bump!!!!


3 posted on 08/08/2007 2:23:05 PM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor
It's long past time for The New Republic to file for intellectual Chapter 7. Arthur Andersen was implicated in fewer frauds.

Ouch!

4 posted on 08/08/2007 2:26:43 PM PDT by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor
In revealing himself two weeks ago, Beauchamp lashed out at "people who have never served in Iraq." He said he was too busy fighting "an actual war" to participate in "an ideological battle that I never wanted to join."

Well then, you little bag of pus, why did you join the Army?

5 posted on 08/08/2007 2:26:54 PM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

More pictures! More, More!

Thanks for the two.


6 posted on 08/08/2007 2:27:54 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor

“A STATEMENT ON SCOTT THOMAS BEAUCHAMP:

“We’ve talked to military personnel directly involved in the events that Scott Thomas Beauchamp described, and they corroborated his account as detailed in our statement. When we called Army spokesman Maj. Steven F. Lamb and asked about an anonymously sourced allegation that Beauchamp had recanted his articles in a sworn statement, he told us, ‘I have no knowledge of that.’ He added, ‘If someone is speaking anonymously (to The Weekly Standard), they are on their own.’ When we pressed Lamb for details on the Army investigation, he told us, ‘We don’t go into the details of how we conduct our investigations.’ — The Editors”

You have to re read the statement. It was about ‘an anonymously sourced allegation’ that Lamb had no knowledge about.

Must say rather mild of Ann. Not her usual acerbic self.


7 posted on 08/08/2007 2:28:04 PM PDT by griswold3 (Al queda is guilty of hiraba (war against society) Penalty is death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

A great line : )


8 posted on 08/08/2007 2:28:24 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: econjack

He joined to give himself credibility - he said so on his own blog. He also happens to be engaged to another reporter on the staff of The New Republic. His whole story stinks to high heaven!


9 posted on 08/08/2007 2:28:42 PM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Ann: Beauty and Brains.

Now if I can only find that email that has pictures of all the female liberals...I especially like the one of Queen Kerry with the twisted mouth...


10 posted on 08/08/2007 2:29:06 PM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor
America's imminent victory in Iraq and safety from terrorist attacks at home is driving them all crazy.

Perhaps the shortest Drive ever Taken. Queen Ann Rox!

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters

11 posted on 08/08/2007 2:30:07 PM PDT by bray (Member of the FR President Bush underground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

12 posted on 08/08/2007 2:30:49 PM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor
Ann Coulter told the truth in this article: the liberals truly are liars. The Clintons' and their lies--constant, evasive, and unrelenting lies are partially why I am, now, a
Recovering_Democrat.
13 posted on 08/08/2007 2:33:45 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Seperated at birth??


14 posted on 08/08/2007 2:34:59 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor

Just more Anonymous Sedition at play. What does it mean? Where will it end?


15 posted on 08/08/2007 2:35:56 PM PDT by Shqipo (We win now or darkness reigns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor

I just love Anne! She can always make me laugh with that laser wit of her, plus the fact that she never backs down!
When I think of the Elizabeth Edwards ambush, I just start laughing. As if Anne were going to crumple in her chair and start crying...


16 posted on 08/08/2007 2:36:12 PM PDT by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble

The Iraqi Congress is outperforming Do Nothing Nancy’s Fiasco.

Pray for W and Our Troops


17 posted on 08/08/2007 2:42:51 PM PDT by bray (Member of the FR President Bush underground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor
Here's Ann Coulter's zinger:

" America's imminent victory in Iraq and safety from terrorist attacks at home is driving them all crazy."

Woo hoo! The Democrats will never recover from it.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

18 posted on 08/08/2007 2:43:33 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor
Actually it was Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp, Democratic candidate for president circa 2028. (That gives him 20 years to learn to pronounce "Genghis.")

Great stuff, Ann!

19 posted on 08/08/2007 2:44:29 PM PDT by omniscient
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

My god, isnt she beautiful......inside and out.
Princess ANN.


20 posted on 08/08/2007 2:47:26 PM PDT by flat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Nice pose ya ninny!


21 posted on 08/08/2007 2:49:41 PM PDT by jayef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor

Full article from Human Events at:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=21877

In their latest demonstration of how much they love the troops, liberals have produced yet another anti-war hoax.

The New Republic has been running “true war” stories from a brave, anonymous liberal penning dispatches from Iraq. The famed “Baghdad Diarist” described his comrades joyfully using Bradley fighting vehicles to crush stray dogs, mocking a female whose face had been blown off by an IED, and defacing Iraqi corpses by wearing skull parts on their own heads.

Various conservatives began questioning the plausibility of the anonymous diarist’s account — noting, for example, that Bradley vehicles don’t “swerve,” as the diarist claimed. The editor of The New Republic responded by attacking the skeptics’ motives, complaining that some conservatives make “a living denying any bad news that emanates from Iraq.”

But when that clever retort failed to quiet rumblings from the right wing, The New Republic finally revealed the “Baghdad Diarist” to be ... John Kerry! Actually it was Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp, Democratic candidate for president circa 2028. (That gives him 20 years to learn to pronounce “Genghis.”)

In revealing himself two weeks ago, Beauchamp lashed out at “people who have never served in Iraq.” He said he was too busy fighting “an actual war” to participate in “an ideological battle that I never wanted to join.”

He had tried to stay out of ideological battles by writing made-up articles in a national magazine claiming soldiers in Iraq had become callous beasts because of George Bush’s war, killing to “secure the riches of the empire.” Alas, this proved an ineffective method of keeping his head low. Beauchamp’s next bid for privacy will be an attempt to host “The Price Is Right.”

In response to Beauchamp’s revelation that he was the “Baghdad Diarist,” the military opened an investigation into his allegations. There was no corroboration for his stories, and Beauchamp promptly signed an affidavit admitting that every single thing he wrote in The New Republic was a lie.

According to The Weekly Standard’s Michael Goldfarb — who has led the charge of those who “make a living denying any bad news that emanates from Iraq” — Maj. Steven F. Lamb, the deputy public affairs officer for Multi-National Division-Baghdad, said this of the Baghdad diarist:

“An investigation has been completed and the allegations made by Pvt. Beauchamp were found to be false. His platoon and company were interviewed and no one could substantiate the claims.”

In response, The New Republic went into full Dan Rather loon mode. This astonishing post showed up on The New Republic Web site on Tuesday afternoon:

“A STATEMENT ON SCOTT THOMAS BEAUCHAMP:

“We’ve talked to military personnel directly involved in the events that Scott Thomas Beauchamp described, and they corroborated his account as detailed in our statement. When we called Army spokesman Maj. Steven F. Lamb and asked about an anonymously sourced allegation that Beauchamp had recanted his articles in a sworn statement, he told us, ‘I have no knowledge of that.’ He added, ‘If someone is speaking anonymously (to The Weekly Standard), they are on their own.’ When we pressed Lamb for details on the Army investigation, he told us, ‘We don’t go into the details of how we conduct our investigations.’ — The Editors”

It’s good to see Mary Mapes is working again.

What on earth is going on? Either the military investigation found that Beauchamp lied or it didn’t. Either military personnel corroborated stories of soldiers wearing skulls as crowns or they didn’t. Either Army spokesman Maj. Steven Lamb gave a statement to The Weekly Standard or he didn’t.

At the same time as The New Republic was posting the above statement, which completely contradicted The Weekly Standard’s update, renowned right-wing news outlet ABC News confirmed that the military has concluded that Beauchamp was writing “fiction.” ABC also quoted Goldfarb’s account and said that Maj. Lamb reiterated his statement that Beauchamp’s stories were false to ABC. The New York Times had the same story on Wednesday.

The New Republic has gone mad. Perhaps the magazine brought its former employee, fantasist Steven Glass, out of retirement. It’s long past time for The New Republic to file for intellectual Chapter 7. Arthur Andersen was implicated in fewer frauds.

And we wonder how Democratic congressmen can lie about a vote they lost on the floor of the House — captured on CSPAN for all the world to see — changing the vote so that they win.

America’s imminent victory in Iraq and safety from terrorist attacks at home is driving them all crazy.


22 posted on 08/08/2007 2:50:12 PM PDT by Forgiven_Sinner (Here's how to prove God's existence: ask Him to reveal Himself to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray

Yes they are. More pro-american too.


23 posted on 08/08/2007 2:50:25 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Nice pics, hope she get on the SCOUSA someday. Never happen but that would be sweet.


24 posted on 08/08/2007 2:52:41 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant
They're losing credibility. They're desperate when they have to LIE about the situation in Iraq.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

25 posted on 08/08/2007 2:53:00 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor
He had tried to stay out of ideological battles by writing made-up articles in a national magazine claiming soldiers in Iraq had become callous beasts because of George Bush's war, killing to "secure the riches of the empire." Alas, this proved an ineffective method of keeping his head low. Beauchamp's next bid for privacy will be an attempt to host "The Price Is Right."

< tee-hee />

26 posted on 08/08/2007 3:02:33 PM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

I wonder how the rest of the platoon took the news that they were a bunch of goons? I bet he feels a little nervous around them now. What a jackass!


27 posted on 08/08/2007 3:03:18 PM PDT by mickey finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Faggotesque.

Both of them.


28 posted on 08/08/2007 3:08:06 PM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mickey finn
This male person is still in the Army??????

He should be stripped of his uniform sent home naked with a pair panties on his head.

29 posted on 08/08/2007 3:11:37 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy
Faggotesque.

Both of them.

Melodramatic, 5th column dandies...

30 posted on 08/08/2007 3:13:52 PM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SandRat; river rat; 2ndDivisionVet; JulieRNR21

Ann Coulter hits one out of the park again, this time on behalf of the brave soldiers fighting in Iraq.


31 posted on 08/08/2007 3:24:10 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Illegal aliens commit crimes that Americans won't commit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

I like the first pic of Ann. Casual, a classic American beauty, fresh-faced, not needing makeup to be pretty.


32 posted on 08/08/2007 3:31:09 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner

Um, I don’t know about this column of A.Coulter’s.

Not going to reach most Dems.

Her biting wit is going to go over their heads.

They will read her column and go, “duh?”


33 posted on 08/08/2007 3:41:52 PM PDT by OldArmy52 (Bush's Legacy: 100 million new Dem voters in next 20 yrs via the 2007 Amnesty Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

She’d love to be nominated, just to say to Kennedy “We’ll drive off the side of that bridge when we come to it”.
I’d miss work to watch the confirmation hearings. Can you imagine how great it would be to watch her run circles around those idiots?
If I were President, I’d nominate Ann Coulter, and Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham and Robert Bork. Then I’d throw in Miguel Estrada and Charles Pickering and Priscilla Owens. The last three would get confirmed for fear of a recess appointment of Judge Ann Coulter.


34 posted on 08/08/2007 3:43:05 PM PDT by chae (R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero He lied, he cheated, he stole my heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor

.


35 posted on 08/08/2007 3:43:18 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you....run, Fred, run. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Can you say, Don’s Ask Don’t Tell?? Bochump looks like Weasly Clark’s personal “valet”!

Pray for W and Our Troops


36 posted on 08/08/2007 3:45:19 PM PDT by bray (Member of the FR President Bush underground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I spent yesterday at a concert with a National Guardsman, back from iraq, and being redeployed in December. According to him, the worst thing they did was they once gave out some rations that included some type of pork product to some Iraqis after they lost one of their guys to a IED.


37 posted on 08/08/2007 3:48:39 PM PDT by chae (R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero He lied, he cheated, he stole my heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: econjack
why did you join the Army?

I think Private Beauchamp joined the Army in order to provide himself some 'street cred' when writing negative stories.

38 posted on 08/08/2007 4:01:39 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

39 posted on 08/08/2007 4:03:53 PM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BARLF

“He should be stripped of his uniform sent home naked with a pair panties on his head.”

I must strongly disagree. He’d probably enjoy it too much.

LOL!


40 posted on 08/08/2007 4:18:17 PM PDT by Brucifer (G. W. Bush "The dog ate my copy of the Constitution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor
Is it possible to believe that Americans are capable of the acts that Pvt. Beauchamp describes in The New Republic?

Of course it is.

If you belong to the party that keeps reelecting a Senator that walked away from a drowning girl.

41 posted on 08/08/2007 4:18:52 PM PDT by Random Access
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

In the 2nd picture, are those two guys....one behind and one on her left...bodyguards?


42 posted on 08/08/2007 4:24:24 PM PDT by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter for President 2008!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor; SandRat; freema

I hope the Soldiers from Beauchamp’s unit SUE THE HELL OUT of the New Republic!

Semper Fi,
Kelly


43 posted on 08/08/2007 4:57:44 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor; jellybean; carlo3b; stanz; gakrak; massfreeper; hosepipe; Donald Rumsfeld Fan; ...
Pinging the Coulter List.



On or off, ping me.

Cheers,

knewshound

44 posted on 08/08/2007 5:07:19 PM PDT by knews_hound (Sarcastically blogging since 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

In the one pic, the man on Ann’s left.... I have seen Ann Coulter three times at CPAC and that guy has always been at her elbow during signature sessions... Ann Coulter’s bodyguard... I’d like to apply for that position!


45 posted on 08/08/2007 5:15:49 PM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
Arthur Andersen was implicated in fewer frauds.

A little clarification for Ann. The feds ran a perfectly good firm out of business; Anderson was initially found guilty of a felony, which precluded the firm from practicing their main business, auditing. Subsequently, that verdict was overturned, as I recall.

46 posted on 08/08/2007 5:20:40 PM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla; 1stbn27; 2111USMC; 2nd Bn, 11th Mar; 68 grunt; A.A. Cunningham; ASOC; AirForceBrat23; ...

Ann’s got a hammer out.


47 posted on 08/08/2007 5:29:01 PM PDT by freema (Proud Marine Niece, Daughter, Wife, Friend, Sister, Aunt, Cousin, Mother, and FRiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor

Pamela Geller and Ann Coulter

48 posted on 08/08/2007 5:35:23 PM PDT by Stepan12 ( "We are all girlymen now." Conservative reaction to Ann Coulter's anti PC joke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JWR_Editor


49 posted on 08/08/2007 5:41:59 PM PDT by Stepan12 ( "We are all girlymen now." Conservative reaction to Ann Coulter's anti PC joke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere
They look like guards, there are actually 3 of them.

I am glad Anne is taking precautions, the dem looney fringe is definitely desperate.

50 posted on 08/08/2007 5:46:41 PM PDT by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-81 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson