Posted on 08/09/2007 4:42:15 PM PDT by Dixie Pirate
The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) was launched in March of 2005 as a trilateral effort to increase security and enhance prosperity among the United States, Canada and Mexico through greater cooperation and information sharing.
This trilateral initiative is premised on our security and our economic prosperity being mutually reinforcing. The SPP recognizes that our three great nations are bound by a shared belief in freedom, economic opportunity, and strong democratic institutions.
The SPP provides the framework to ensure that North America is the safest and best place to live and do business. It includes ambitious security and prosperity programs to keep our borders closed to terrorism yet open to trade.
The SPP builds upon, but is separate from, our long-standing trade and economic relationships. It energizes other aspects of our cooperative relations, such as the protection of our environment, our food supply, and our public health.
Looking forward, President Bush, Prime Minister Harper and President Fox have identified emergency management; influenza pandemics, including avian influenza; energy security; and safe and secure gateways (border security and facilitation) as key priorities for the SPP. The Leaders also announced the creation of North American Competitiveness Council to fully incorporate the private sector into the SPP process.
Why don't they enforce immigration law? If the borders get blurred enough then it will be easier to get rid of them all together. The only borders they are going to concentrate on enforcing in the future will not include those between Canada, the U.S., and Mexico.
If it looks like a duck... Yeah, right! I think this one's about to quack!
And if you look deeper, you’ll find that one of the SPP’s achievements was the standardization of apparel care labels. Think about that the next time you see a “DRY CLEAN ONLY” symbol. There are people in Canada and Mexico looking at the same thing.
We should let Cuba into it and then it will be a quadrilateral effort.
I like that idea to bring Cuber into it too. This of course would immediately raise the level of health care, as their advanced system is copied here.
It’s now called NAU (North American Union). Is our government looking to get the American people to take up arms to protect our country. Recall all Congressmen/women that go for this idiotic scenario.
Isn’t that a sign of the end times?
The clincher will be SPP mattress tags reading "Feel free to remove this."
Wait until we build a single road that crosses the border into either country.
That will be the sign that the Rapture is near.
Woops, I looked deeper. Big mistake. I didn’t find the dry cleaning bill but I did find this:————————————————————————————————————————
Prosperous and Secure Neighbor Alliance Act of 2007 (Introduced in House)
HR 502 IH
110th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 502
To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to authorize assistance to improve security and promote economic development in Mexico.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 17, 2007
Mr. CUELLAR (for himself and Mr. REYES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs
A BILL
To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to authorize assistance to improve security and promote economic development in Mexico.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Prosperous and Secure Neighbor Alliance Act of 2007’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS; STATEMENT OF POLICY.
(a) Findings- Congress finds the following:
(1) An alarming increase in illicit drugs and drug-related violence in Mexico and on the United States-Mexico border has made life gradually more difficult for Americans living in border communities.
(2) The precarious security situation on the United States-Mexico border has also had a broader negative impact in the United States with illicit drugs continuing to get into the hands of our Nation’s children.
(3) United States Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte named Mexico in the Annual Threat Assessment of the Director of National Intelligence for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (February 2, 2006) as a country of concern regarding the capacity of drug trafficking organizations to undermine already weak state authority.
(4) As a neighbor and as the second largest trading partner of the United States, Mexico deserves the support of the United States in taking steps to improve security and promote economic development in Mexico.
(b) Statement of Policy- It is, therefore, the policy of the United States to increase United States foreign assistance to improve security and promote economic development in Mexico, both of which are crucial to more effectively combat illicit drugs and drug-related violence and other criminal activities in Mexico and the United States.
SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961.
Part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq) is amended by adding at the end the following:
`CHAPTER 13—ASSISTANCE TO IMPROVE SECURITY AND PROMOTE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN MEXICO
`SEC. 499H. AUTHORIZATION OF ASSISTANCE.
`(a) In General- The President, acting through the Director of Foreign Assistance, shall provide assistance to improve security and promote economic development in Mexico by—
`(1) professionalizing Mexican law enforcement personnel to prepare such law enforcement personnel to more effectively combat illicit drugs and drug-related violence and other criminal activities, including by providing funding to coordinate United States and Mexican efforts to find missing United States citizens and to carry out DNA testing and forensic examinations;
`(2) providing technology to assist Mexican law enforcement personnel to more effectively combat illicit drugs and drug-related violence;
`(3) strengthening the Mexican judicial branch through the training of judges and prosecutors;
`(4) supporting anti-corruption programs in Mexico, including the vetting of Mexican law enforcement personnel who are working with United States Government personnel; and
`(5) reducing poverty through targeted funding to enhance social development in Mexico, including micro-lending and trade capacity building.
`(b) Terms and Conditions- Assistance under this chapter may be provided on such terms and conditions as the President may determine.
`SEC. 499I. EVALUATION.
`The President shall conduct an annual evaluation of the results of the specific programs, projects, and activities carried out under this chapter during the preceding year in order to ensure transparency and accountability, including transparency and accountability of recipients of assistance provided under this chapter.
`SEC. 499J. REPORT.
`The President shall prepare and transmit to the Committee on International Relations of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and other appropriate congressional committees an annual report on the specific programs, projects, and activities carried out under this chapter during the preceding year, including the evaluation conducted under section 499I.
`SEC. 499K. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
`(a) In General- There are authorized to be appropriated to the President to carry out this chapter $170,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2008 through 2012.
`(b) Additional Authorities- Amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations under subsection (a)—
`(1) are authorized to remain available until expended; and
`(2) are in addition to amounts otherwise available for such purposes.
`(c) Funding Limitation- Not more than 5 percent of the amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations under subsection (a) for a fiscal year may be used for administrative expenses.
`(d) Sense of Congress- It is the sense of Congress that, of the amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations under subsection (a) for a fiscal year—
`(1) $40,000,000 should be made available to carry out section 499H(a)(1);
`(2) $50,000,000 should be made available to carry out section 499H(a)(2);
`(3) $20,000,000 should be made available to carry out section 499H(a)(3);
`(4) $10,000,000 should be made available to carry out section 499H(a)(4); and
`(5) $50,000,000 should be made available to carry out section 499H(a)(5).’.
SEC. 4. REPORT BY GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report that contains a description and analysis of the most effective strategies to reduce the demand for illicit drugs in the United States, specifically (but not limited to) strategies that reduce the demand for illicit drugs produced in or transported through Mexico.
THIS SEARCH THIS DOCUMENT GO TO
Next Hit Forward New Bills Search
Prev Hit Back HomePage
Hit List Best Sections Help
Contents Display
THOMAS Home | Contact | Accessibility | Legal | USA.gov
Again, NAFTA continues to be a failure just as the SPP and NAU will also be failures.
Hey Rudeboy, tell us about the labels that are not on food. The law was passed 2002. Big corporations would never break the law for free trade. sarcasm.
We are elated that you will be able to read “dry clean only” in 500 different languages.
Speaking of which, if we have to give up our sovereignty to other nations, I say omit Mexico and include Brazil, which has some of the hottest babes in the world.
But only if we have to.
Hey texastoo, tell me about how since the beginning of the summer almost all of my produce is individually-labeled. How ever did that happen without you and the gubmint getting involved?
You know, if you provided the Thomas link to that bill, we could find out its status.
LOL
It will get out of committee. Don’t worry about it.
We have a label law. It is only half/way enforced. Do you know where your meat comes from?
“I found it. Please explain what that bill, which is languishing in committee, has to do with the SPP”
http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/060607_spp_records.html
There are plenty of articles about the U.S. financing or building the infrastructure of Mexico. Just google spp infrastructure mexico.
Cuellar’s bill is for that purpose. Too bad NAFTA was such a failure. It should have pai d for Mexico’s infrastructure not the poor American taxpapyer.
Maybe. It’s been there for almost seven months. Pelosi, Lantos, and Cuellar need to get crackin’. The meat I eat comes from Texas (last time I checked). Weren’t we talking about the SPP? What does the bill you found have to do with it? What about meat?
The bill involves Mexico. The SPP involves Mexico. Just as I thought. Sounds serious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.