Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

“That is one of the questions we asked Congressman Hunter for Monday’s Freep conference.”

This coming Monday? 8/13?


53 posted on 08/10/2007 10:01:09 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: sageb1

Yes. around noontime. I will post the questions we sent him a couple weeks ago and his answers. He will then take followups live on monday


54 posted on 08/10/2007 10:05:58 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: All
Ever ask yourself this question, where did the law of sea treaty come from? Pssssst, the CFR is mentioned too.

So who came up with this?

If you want to find out what inspires any questionable idea, it is necessary to go to the source.

For that, we are indebted to Cliff Kincaid whose America's Survival website has dug deep through a mountain of research on that specific question.

It turns out that one of the authors of LOST is one Elisabeth Mann Borgese, a socialist and key figure in the pro-world government World Federalists of Canada. Kincaid cites original source material for the first Peace in the Oceans Conference which the German-born Borgese (who died in 2002) organized. Out of the conference emerged the idea of an "Ocean Development Tax." Revenue derived from that source, according to Borgese, would help underwrite the United Nations.

In her book The Oceanic Circle: Governing the Seas as a Global Resource, Borgese openly proclaimed her admiration for Karl Marx.

While establishment figures such as John Temple Swing of the Council on foreign Relations (CFR) endorsed the effort to pass the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), Kincaid's ASI has come up with solid documentary evidence that "the treaty was viewed by many early supporters as part of a communist-supported New International Economic Order to undermine the U.S. Some key treaty backers were pacifists, proud members of the world government movement who opposed a strong national defense for the U.S. and feared that the U.S. would unilaterally exploit the resources of the ocean. They were outraged by opposition to the pact by President Reagan and his top advisers."

President Bush's better advisers should try to talk him out of this. Otherwise, conservatives need to treat it as a Harriet Miers moment and apply their shoes to the sand, and let the foot-dragging begin.

If this tidbit doesn't tell you all you need to know about who's behind this garbage, nothing will.

56 posted on 08/10/2007 10:11:42 AM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson