Posted on 08/13/2007 1:24:44 PM PDT by pissant
Terri's Freepers carry on so that natural death is the norm, not an exception. Natural death is not a religious right but a human right.
Further, it is wrong for the media to refer to Ms. Schiavo as an "issue". She was a human being whose rights were stepped on by many special interest groups and as you know, even by republicans.
Euthanasia is supposed to be illegal but it crept in much the way illegal immigration crept in.
I would hope disabled Americans whether they are veterans or not would have civil liberties in you administration. Terri's death began the first exodus of dollars and volunteering from the GOP. People like me would like to be republicans again but not until opposition to EUTHANASIA becomes part of the GOP platform.
The poor girl was railroaded.
http://www.judgegeorgegreer.com (a Republican). Some of your opponents are being funded by folks mentioned there. No need for you to comment on the web site noted above. I am providing FYI only. Euthanasia and genocide are global problems but let's start with the GOP platform. If it must be done without mentioning her name, so be it. It must however, be done.
Fregards, that is all I have to say.
floriduh voter
I'm glad no one got on him for being a noob and posting his first post 3 times...LOL
“Im not adverse to defending TR, just not here.”
I know.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?s=terri+schiavo&ok=Search&q=quick&m=any&o=time&SX=46c23fd70fd76685b69a5f53c0730e3bd98025cb
Something was going awry when he was trying to post his first post. Jim fixed it.
Yea I know, no problem!
Just a little levity...
:>)
Oh and good job getting this thing together with DH and FR. Great job!
Congressman Hunter, you have my continued support and my vote.
>I can’t wait to see Mr. Hunter speak tomorrow night.<
Keep us posted, will you tg?
I have a few donations I made that I don’t see also. But they may have been made to the PAC. I don’t know.
I’ve only made one $50 donation through the website. All the rest of my contributions, including the one I am about to mail, are sent directly to La Mesa, and addressed to Hunter for President. All in all, I’ve contributed over $1400.00 so far. I hope everyone who said they were sending money since Sunday follows through, too. :)
When you do it through the mail, do you get any kind of receipt or acknowledgement? Were the checks cashed? And they are still not showing on OpenSecrets?
No receipts or acknowledgements. I presume they were cashed. They were made out of several money market fund accounts, and they’ve shown up on my statements. And today open secrets is $800 short. I reported this to La Mesa in a note included with my latest contribution, which I just got back from mailing.
The federal government has NO business forcing Americans to get permission from the Department of Homeland Security in order to work.
Combating illegal immigration does not require such a loss of liberty and privacy. And believe me, this would be an unprecedented loss of liberty and privacy. Go ahead and read the link I provided for some of the legitimate concerns raised (and it barely scratches the surface).
How can you enforce existing laws if no one knows a persons legal status?
You act as though the existing system has never identified an illegal immigrant. And yet, employer crackdowns manage to make the news now and again. The only thing that prevents their broader success is the policy of G.W. Bush, under whose leadership the crackdowns decreased.
>>>You act as though the existing system has never identified an illegal immigrant.
Sanctuary states do not report or identify illegal aliens.
“The federal government has NO business forcing Americans to get permission from the Department of Homeland Security in order to work”.
That is an erroneous statement. No one is giving you permission to work. They are PREVENTING illegals from working.
It is the equivalent to saying that having to show your driver’s license to get into a tavern is preventing you from drinking there.
That's a non sequitur.
The Employment Eligibility Verification System would make you completely at the mercy of the Department of Homeland Security in order to be "eligible" to work. If they require biometric data from you, and you refuse, you cannot be employed anywhere in the United States. If they adopt the REAL ID card with a RFID chip, as is currently the plan, you cannot work without one. The potential abuses of that technology are readily available on the 'net for your information.
And no, per the Privacy Act of 1974, there are only twelve conditions under which you are required by law to produce your SSN, and applying for a job is not one of them.
You are blowing smoke, frankly.
12,445+ views!
Find out more here:
http://www.peacethroughstrengthpac.com/Home.aspx
and
http://www.gohunter08.com/Home.aspx
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.