Skip to comments.
Padilla Verdict in one Hour in Miami
Fox News ^
| 16 Aug 07
| Fox News
Posted on 08/16/2007 9:31:33 AM PDT by xzins
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: RasterMaster
Those side by side pictures have always creeped me out .. if only we’d know “the rest of the story” .. :(
21
posted on
08/16/2007 10:19:24 AM PDT
by
pamlet
To: xzins
The jury has reached a verdict in the Jose Padilla trial. It will be read shortly after 2 p.m.
22
posted on
08/16/2007 10:19:26 AM PDT
by
A. Morgan
(Fred Thompson’s record is solid and he does not waffle. Fred for PREZ in 2008!)
To: jdm
I do recall that. I don’t know, but you think that someone would have picked up on that by now.
Errr...wouldn’t they?
23
posted on
08/16/2007 10:20:18 AM PDT
by
Shelayne
(I will continue to pray for President Bush and my country, as I am commanded to do by my Lord.)
To: RasterMaster
Disturbing, to say the least.
24
posted on
08/16/2007 10:20:38 AM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(Ron Paul put the cuckoo in my Cocoa Puffs)
To: A. Morgan
News Flash Ron Paul flies to Miami to announce his VP choice.
LOL!
25
posted on
08/16/2007 10:21:34 AM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(Ron Paul put the cuckoo in my Cocoa Puffs)
To: RasterMaster
For the past several years, like a person with a mental health problem, I would blurt out on Jose Padilla threads “He is John Doe number 2 or his twin and NOBODY says anything!”. It is sooooo twilight zone it freaks me out. And, even though you post this, the denial is so deep it still amazes me.
To: xzins
CNN’s spin
“The CIA recovered the al Qaeda “mujahedeen data form” that is central in the case in Afghanistan after the U.S. invasion in late 2001. It contains seven of Padilla’s fingerprints, one of his alleged Muslim alias names, his true birthday, notes the applicant’s ability to speak English, Spanish and Arabic and has other identifying details.
But there was little other hard evidence linking Padilla, a Muslim convert, to al Qaeda or to the alleged North American terror support cell prosecutors say was operated by Hassoun, Jayyousi and others. Thousands of hours of FBI wiretap intercepts from 1993 to 2001 include numerous conversations of Hassoun and Jayyousi, but Padilla’s voice is heard on only seven.”
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/law/08/16/padilla.trial.ap/index.html
27
posted on
08/16/2007 10:29:01 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
To: tobyhill
Thousands of hours of FBI wiretap intercepts from 1993 to 2001 include numerous conversations of Hassoun and Jayyousi, but Padillas voice is heard on only seven.Maybe seven hours is all he needed. A person can say A LOT in seven hours and CNN uses the word "only" to describe seven hours, like it's insignificant or something.
28
posted on
08/16/2007 10:32:52 AM PDT
by
jdm
To: tobyhill
Just how much hard evidence to you need unless you’re trying a case in D.C. or downtown L.A.?
29
posted on
08/16/2007 10:35:38 AM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(Clinton-Obama '08. Start building your fallout shelters today!)
To: jdm
Maybe seven hours is all he needed. It only took the left 18-1/2 minutes to convict Nixon, with nothing on it.
30
posted on
08/16/2007 10:37:47 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
To: tobyhill
They had to throw out just about all the info against Padilla because NCIS (?) (Naval Cid) “forgot” to read him his rights.
I don’t think there’s a necessity for the military to read rights to a military-based capture.
31
posted on
08/16/2007 10:39:17 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
To: jdm
In my experience, seven hours in a jury room is nothing. I suspect they took an initial vote to get a sense of where everyone was at and were pretty close from the start. The document is pretty damning hard evidence. I’ve been handed less as a juror.
32
posted on
08/16/2007 10:39:19 AM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(Clinton-Obama '08. Start building your fallout shelters today!)
To: jdm
I think “seven” refers to conversations not hours.
To: jdm
Terry Nichols' ex-wife's last name is Padilla. Any relation to José Padilla?No Relation to Nichols Ex-Wife
One misconception fueling the initial interest in Padilla as a candidate for John Doe 2 was his surname. Terry Nichols, McVeigh's accomplice in the OKC plot, had an ex-wife named Lana Padilla, a resident of Las Vegas, NV. Nichols and Padilla had an amicable relationship and shared a son, Josh.
Interviewed in 2002, Lana Padilla said she was not aware of any relation to Jose Padilla. Lana Padilla's surname came from a former marriage. There is no evidence to suggest that Leonard Padilla, Lana's ex-husband, is related to Jose Padilla in any way. Lana Padilla continues to aver that she believes there was a John Doe 2 (an argument which supports the legal position of her ex-husband, currently facing a potential death sentence in an Oklahoma trial).
34
posted on
08/16/2007 10:48:49 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(JOIN THE NRA: https://membership.nrahq.org/forms/signup.asp)
To: RasterMaster
Good post. Plus, where are all the Iraqis that lived in OK City then? I know of two of them busted at Logan in '03.
5.56mm
35
posted on
08/16/2007 10:51:42 AM PDT
by
M Kehoe
To: Miss Marple
36
posted on
08/16/2007 10:52:10 AM PDT
by
M Kehoe
To: Lazamataz
37
posted on
08/16/2007 10:55:42 AM PDT
by
jdm
To: All
Thanks to all for keeping cubically challenged updated.
Fingers crossed.
38
posted on
08/16/2007 10:57:06 AM PDT
by
JerseyDvl
(If You Support America - Thank a Soldier; If You Support Al-Qaeda - Thank a Democrat or Ron Paul!)
To: Lazamataz
Sure there is...they're all Bilderbergers...
(ducking)
39
posted on
08/16/2007 10:57:10 AM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(Did Dennis Kucinich always look like that or did he have to submit to a series of shots? [firehat])
To: xzins
40
posted on
08/16/2007 10:59:41 AM PDT
by
markman46
(engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson