Posted on 08/17/2007 4:12:53 AM PDT by monomaniac
By Peter J. Smith
BOSTON, August 16, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney has thrown his endorsement behind a human life amendment, an important clarification of the presidential hopeful's pro-life position as he bids for the Republican nomination.
Romney made the choice to abandon his earlier rejection of the human life amendment as he poured money and energy into winning the Ames caucus in Iowa, where Republican voters run strongly social conservative.
"I do support the Republican platform and I do support that big part of the Republican platform, and I am pro-life," Romney said during an August 6 Republican debate, when asked whether he affirmed the human life amendment, a key part of the 2004 Republican pro-life platform that was written by his pro-life advisor James Bopp, jr.
A human life amendment intends to change the US Constitution by expanding 14th Amendment protections - such as due process and equal protection clauses - to include unborn children. Such an amendment would ban abortions nationwide and repeal the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision.
However the Associated Press reports that Romney later qualified his support for a human life amendment. According to the AP, Romney said his advisor Bopp had told him "there are a wide range of possible human life amendments" ranging from a total ban on abortion to an amendment that let states make the decision. On top of that, getting both houses of Congress and 38 out of 50 states to support a constitutional amendment, Bopp told him, "is just not realistic."
Romney said he prefers a strategy of appointing strict constitutionalist judges, who might overturn Roe v. Wade, and allow the states to decide their policy regarding abortion. However, qualifying his support for the human life amendment would seem an unwise political move for Romney, who is trying to gain the trust of social conservatives skeptical of his pro-life conversion. President Bush also gave support to the amendment to win the GOP nomination.
Romney's 2005 pro-life conversion has been subject to scrutiny by pro-life advocates, including Republican presidential candidate and senator Sam Brownback, who say Romney's post-conversion actions do not demonstrate a true pro-life conviction. Romney approved in 2006 the Massachusetts health care plan that included taxpayer funding for abortions. In a 2005 Boston Globe editorial Romney also came out in favor of supporting stem-cell research on "surplus embryos from in vitro fertilization."
Hounded by the abortion question, Romney recently told reporters: "I'm pro-life; it would be great if we could just leave it at that."
Related coverage by LifeSiteNews.com:
Youtube Video Questions Romney's Pro-Life Conversion Story
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/jun/07061505.html
The Romney Report: An Analysis of Republican Mitt Romney's Legacy on Life and Family
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/may/07050711.html
The Romney Report: An In-Depth Analysis of Mitt Romney's Legacy on Life and Family Continued - Part II
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/may/07051409.html
Gov. Romney and His Enforcement of the Pro-Same-Sex Goodridge Decision
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/may/07051511.html
More adjusting of his public position to garner more votes.Anyone care to guess what his real stance is?
Haven’t you seen the straw poll?
Either he was taking politically expedient positions on this issue when running in Mass or he is doing it now. I tend not to believe politicians about mid-campaign conversations on moral issues.
Oh boy,now you’ve gone and done it.Cue the Romneybots in 3,2,1....
Hah.
As I've been saying for some time, Bopp has sold his soul to support the liberal former Governor of Massachusetts.
Such an amendment would be the destruction of the cornerstone of American liberty: the belief that all persons have been given the unalienable right to life by their Creator.
The Gerald Ford position.
I'll stick with Ronald Reagan's: Unborn children are persons, and are therefore protected by the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments.
This has been the platform of the Republican Party since Ronald Reagan.
Destroy that fundamental plank, or nominate someone like Romney, and I'm gone. And I'll take as many votes with me as I can muster.
After decades of support for abortion on demand by Mitt Romney, for him to show up and claim to be pro-life on the eve of a presidential election, just because he now needs pro-life votes, is crazy.
It would be like Bill Clinton suddenly wanting to lead a movement toward chastity.
However the Associated Press reports that Romney later qualified his support for a human life amendment.
Romney said he prefers a strategy of appointing strict constitutionalist judges, who might overturn Roe v. Wade, and allow the states to decide their policy regarding abortion.
This is out and out political fraud.
That video is one that all the Romneyu supporters here should watch.It will be interesting to see how some of them will try to spin it.
They ignore it.
They ignore a lot of things.
Right. Don’t ask me no questions and I won’t tell ya no lies. LOL
I’ll guess he doesnt have a real stance, he just checks with his handlers to see what he should say in front of which audience.
Yeah. Doesn’t work too well in the age of the internet, though. Thank God.
The Abilene Reporter-News | Abilene, Texas | Wednesday, February 04, 1976 | Page 16
Ford Against 'Abortions on Demand'
WASHINGTON (AP) - President Ford said Tuesday he would oppose a constitutional amendment prohibiting abortion, but prefers one that would give states the right to decide such issues.
"I do not believe in abortion on demand," Ford said in a television interview. But, he added, that there must be some flexibility in the law to permit abortion in cases involving the mother's illness or rape.
Describing his views as "a moderate position," Ford addressed the abortion issue in an interview with CBS correspondent Waller Cronkite. He said that while he did not agree with the Supreme Court's 1973 decision legalizing abortion, he had taken an oath of office to uphold the law as interpreted by the court and would do so.
The high court has ruled that a state cannot bar a woman from obtaining an abortion from a licensed physician during the first three months of pregnancy. The decision permits the regulation of abortion in the second three months of pregnancy to preserve and protect the mother's health. States are permitted to forbid abortions in the final three months.
Ford said, "I do not believe in abortion on demand. I do not agree with the court decision."
He said he agreed there were instances, such as illness of the mother and rape, "when abortion should be permitted." But, he said, he felt the "preferable answer" was through an amendment that would permit the states to make their own decisions on their own abortion laws.
The president of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, Archbishop Joseph L. Bernardine of Cincinnati, Ohio, called Ford's views "inconsistent and disappointing." The Roman Catholic Church has been in the forefront of efforts to ban abortion nationwide.
While criticizing the President, Archbishop Bernardine's statement said: "It would be unfair to be any more critical of Mr. Ford than of some other prominent political leaders, whose views on the abortion issue appear to be equally confused."
Constitutional amendments have been proposed both to ban abortion and to return the authority to the states for regulating abortion.
A House judiciary subcommittee on civil and constitutional rights begins hearings Wednesday on abortion amendments.
Ronald Reagan, Ford's rival for the GOP presidential nomination, has endorsed a constitutional amendment approach that would, in effect, prevent most abortions but allow them in extreme cases such as when a mother's life is in danger. Among Democratic candidates, only George Wallace has voiced support for an anti-abortion amendment, although several others say they oppose abortion in principle.
Press Secretary Ron Nessen, expanding on Ford's views expressed in the interview, said the President "does not support a constitutional amendment to prohibit abortion. He really feels that if there is to be any further action in this area ... individual states should decide."
And, Nessen said, if there were a constitutional amendment to let the states determine their own abortion laws, Ford "would support such an amendment."
Nessen emphasized that as President, Ford "doesn't play any part in the (constitutional) amendment process" and would "stay out of it."
The President's wife [Betty Ford] has said that "it was the best thing in the world when the Supreme Court voted to legalize abortion and bring it out of the backwoods and put it in the hospitals where it belongs." She said, "I thought it was a great, great decision."
And, when asked to comment on Ford's views Tuesday, press secretary Sheila Weidenfeld said Mrs. Ford just repeated that statement.
Wallace, Reagan Only Candidates Who Favor Antiabortion Amendment
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Ford's suggestion Tuesday that the abortion question be left up to the states puts him at odds with Republican challenger Ronald Reagan, who says the federal government should outlaw most abortions.
Among the Democratic presidential candidates, Sen. Henry Jackson shares Ford's views on letting the states decide but has not suggested, as Ford did, a constitutional amendment to allow this.
The only other candidate to come out for a flat ban on abortion by demand is Democrat George Wallace of Alabama. Both Wallace and Reagan have endorsed an amendment banning abortion except in extreme cases.
Most other candidates have said they are against abortion in principle but oppose amending the Constitution to ban it.
The Supreme Court ruled in January 1973 that stales cannot prohibit abortions in the first three months of pregnancy, although they were left some regulatory control thereafter.
At least a dozen constitutional amendments are pending in Congress which would circumvent this ruling by granting states sole jurisdiction over abortion.
There are 40 more proposed amendments which would outlaw abortions at the federal level. The most stringent of these would ban any abortion from the moment of conception.
The proposals backed by Reagan and Wallace would have the effect of returning to the situation prior to the Supreme Court ruling, when abortions generally were banned but allowed in specific emergencies, such as for rape victims or when the mother's life was in danger.
Reagan told a rally of antiabortion activists in a telegram last month that he supported their work "to insure that the right of life will belong to all human beings born or unborn. Passage of the Human life Amendment is the most certain way to insure this. I support it."
The amendment referred to is sponsored by Sen. Jesse Helms, R-N.C, and is one of those which would have the effect of allowing abortions only in exceptional circumstances.
Wallace issued a policy statement Monday opposing legalized abortion and calling for a constitutional amendment to "protect the lives of unborn children."
"Actions of the Supreme Court on abortions are another example of a destruction of true values in our society," Wallace said.
Jackson has issued a campaign statement saying he believes "life begins with conception, and I am opposed to abortion terminating a pregnancy which is not a threat to life or health."
Sargent Shriver, another of the Democratic contenders, has said he opposes abortion but would uphold the Supreme Court ruling. He has suggested alternatives such as contraceptive and psychiatric aid.
Shriver, too, has rejected the currently proposed amendments but says: "However, I support fully the efforts of people who would like to use the amendment process to minimize the need for or the permissiveness involved with respect to abortion."
Sen. Lloyd Bentsen, D-Tex., has said he supports the Supreme Court decision but still believes "the rights of those medical personnel and hospital administrators who have objections to abortion as a matter of conscience must also be observed." He has said he opposes an amendment.
Rep. Morris Udall, D-Ariz., and former Sen. Fred Harris, D-Okla., both have voiced support for the Supreme Court ruling and opposition to any amendment.
Jimmy Carter has taken the most typical stance among Democratic aspirants: He says he is opposed to abortion but does not favor a constitutional amendment banning it.
Carter said he favored governmental assistance toward pregnancy prevention, including education and birth control assistance.
The President's wife [Betty Ford] has said that "it was the best thing in the world when the Supreme Court voted to legalize abortion and bring it out of the backwoods and put it in the hospitals where it belongs." She said, "I thought it was a great, great decision."Wow. It's a little off topic, but I can't help but notice the crazy irony in Betty Ford's praise of the Supreme Court, which used self-professed ignorance, essentially backwoods biology, to bring killing "out of the backwoods" and "into hospitals where it belongs". Wacked out.
Cordially,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.