Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RON PAUL DEFRAUDED BY IOWA STRAW POLL PROCESS -- Part I (LAUGH ALERT)
votefraud.org ^ | Jim Condit Jr.

Posted on 08/17/2007 10:46:03 AM PDT by Chi-townChief

This e-wire / report ultimately makes two points:

1. The voting process at the Iowa Straw Poll was a fraud, wrapped in lies. (Whenever those running any kind of an election use police power to hide all the ballots from the people, and then announce results (?) when supposedly (?) only they have seen the ballots – those people are frauds, are acting like Stalin-esque tyrants, and their organization is a fraud.

That award goes in our current drama to the Iowa GOP leadership, namely Ted Sporer, Chuck Laudner, Mary Tiffany, Craig Robinson, and Chairman Ray Hoffman. What they did to Ron Paul and all those who paid $35 to vote in the Iowa Straw Poll, and all those who entered into a contract with them by paying $35 to support the event, is UNCONSCIONABLE!

These KGB/GESTAPO TYPES, groveling before the sinister banking powers in NYC and behind the RNC and the DNC, -- and acting as their enforcers in Iowa -- hid all the EVIDENCE (the ballots) at the Iowa Straw Poll and announced the alleged results based on their assertion alone – which the rest of us are supposed to take and believe on blind faith!

I am joined by already thousands of others in saying: WE DON’T BELIEVE YOU! You hid the evidence! You have hidden the ballots – and now you have had time to switch the ballots! You fronted for crooks, thieves, enemies of America, enemies of honest people everywhere!

The US Supreme Court has ruled twice in the last one hundred years, in U.S v Mosley (1915) and Reynolds v Sims (1964), that our right to vote includes not only the right to cast a ballot, but the right to know that our vote was counted accurately.

There is only one reason to hide the ballots from press, from candidates, and from the people – because those so hiding the ballots want to keep open the option to cheat – to rig the election.

The evidence is the BALLOTS, which should have been kept in public view all day, and counted in the presence of ALL factions, before said ballots leave the public view.

LONGEST DELAY EVER

In 1995, when the “unbelievable” tie occurred between CFR favorites Senator Bob Dole and Senator Phil Graham – the doors were locked for two solid hours after the voting ended.

As I have said for years, only the GOP leadership was behind the locked doors in 1995, and all of them supported either Dole or Graham. The published “results” that year were that Buchanan, who by far got the best reception from the crowd, came in second with about 1950 – but that Dole and Graham “tied” for first place at exactly 2501 to 2501.

MANY people were not buying it, and Robert Novak of CNN suggested the next morning that the straw poll vote had been “cooked.” (By the way, Fred Smart interviewed a person on Saturday who also gave his witness from 1995 that only Dole and Graham people were behind the locked doors in the “counting” room in 1995.)

Our strong suspicion was that Buchanan came in first in 1995, but this result was unpalatable to the Neo-Cons running the GOP in NYC and D.C. So, the Dole and Graham people wanted to place Buchanan in second place, but neither would give way to the other on first place. Thus, the almost impossible tie was agreed upon.

This year of 2007 saw the longest delay EVER – 15 minutes loger than the 1995 delay. In 2007, the Ron Paul year, -- it was 2 hours and 15 minutes before the announcement came from the podium.

THE BEST HUNCH

While we are totally devoid of evidence (the ballots), the best analysis I’ve heard is this: that probably Dr. Paul came in second to Romney who spent hundreds of thousands of $$ to bus in people.

However, this result – Ron Paul coming in second place in the 2007 Iowa Straw Poll -- was totally unpalatable to the Iowa GOP and their NYC masters and D.C. handlers. Such a result would have shown both the GOP at the state and national level, and the 5 Big TV Networks – to be liars and falsifiers of evidence up until the Iowa Straw Poll.

The World Tyranny Ruling Elite needed Paul to appear to finish near the bottom so that they could ignore him completely on the mass media. Therefore, the suspicion is that Ron Paul’s vote was partially stolen and distributed to Huckabee, Brownback, and Romney. (Tancredo would not be helped by the Iowa GOP, despite his neo-con outlook on foreign affairs, because his anti-illegal immigration stance is completely unpalatable to the Ruling Elite in NYC and D.C. who dictate to the Iowa GOP, and all other state GOPs.)

As usual in computer-generated elections – everything came up smelling like roses for the Neo-con wirepullers behind the scenes of both parties.

THE AFFIDAVITS ARE ESSENTIAL! PLEASE HELP!

2. We need the affidavits of 1306+ Iowans who voted at the straw poll for Ron Paul – in order to prove, if such is the case, that the PUBLISHED count which the Iowa GOP announced was not accurate with regard to Ron Paul’s vote. (All who actually voted are welcome to submit affidavits.)

SOME DISTURBING NUMBERS

The comprehensive published “results” will be in a future report in this series -- view them online here:

http://blog.ronpaul2008.com/ron_paul_2008/2007/08/iowa-straw-poll.html

-- but at this point the reader may want to know that the Iowa GOP claims that Romney came in first with 4516 votes, and Ron Paul came in 5th with 1305 votes.

Hear ye! Hear ye! The Ron Paul Campaign has confirmed to callers what was repeated at the event itself -- that the campaign bought and gave away 800 tickets. The “Adopt an Iowan group” (an independent effort) has published that they had collected $22,500 and purchased 643 tickets. (By the way, since the “Adopt and Iowan” page won’t allow you to copy it, I have printed it out to preserve the documentation.)

So now we are being asked to believe that Ron Paul got less votes (1305) than the tickets purchased by the campaign and the “Adopt an Iowan” campaign (totally 1443) – and that NO ONE in Iowa came on their own to pay $35 and vote for Ron Paul !!!!!

The Ron Paul Campaign AND the Adopt an Iowan campaign kept track of who the tickets were given to (I hope). This is enough affidavits to prove that the announced Diebold “count” was wrong. – And we want to find as many other Iowa citizens as possible who paid $35 out of their own pocket to vote – so we can get their affidavits also.

This seems to be a smoking gun. This will be the greatest and most irrefutable proof ever that a Diebold computer was used to rig an election!

We need the affidavits of any Iowan who voted for Ron Paul at the Ames, Iowa Straw Poll. If we succeed – then we will have the proof that the Diebold computers at the Iowa Straw Poll of 2007 – were rigged.

If you voted in the Iowa Straw Poll on August 11, 2007 – and if you need an affidavit to make sure your vote counts, and especially if you want to help us prove whether or not the result published for Ron Paul was accurate – you can go to:

www.votefraud.org/iowa_straw_poll_2007_report_affidavit_part1.htm

At the top and bottom of that article is a link to the relevant affidavit. Simply right click on the link, use “Save target as” and save the word document to your computer where you can find it. You will then have an affidavit to fill out, and get notarized at a bank, Kinkos, etc., and to mail back to us.

A number of affidavits are already in hand.

End of this e-wire.

Jim Condit Jr.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008electionbias; asseenonstormfront; bananas; bedlam; bellevue; bonkers; breakingnewsspam; cuckoforkookopaul; dajooooooooooos; daviddukecandidate; dnctalkingpoints; howarddeancandidate; howtostealanelection; iowastrawpoll; jewskickedmydawg; jewsrippedmyflesh; jewsundermybed; johnbirchsociety; lhudesingcuccu; liberaltarians; loonytoons; lronpaul; moonbatsforronpaul; morethorazineplease; notendorsedbyronpaul; obragore; ohnoitsthejews; paranoidloons; paul; paulbearers; paulestinians; paulsjihad; preciousbodilyfluids; rawstorycandidate; rongore; ronpaul; ronpaulgoingbananas; rupaul; sorelibertarian; soreloserman2008; strawpoll; tinfoil; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 701-738 next last
Looks like they got him again!!
1 posted on 08/17/2007 10:46:07 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief; mnehrling; BlackElk; soccermom; wideawake; elhombrelibre; Petronski

Break out the popcorn...this one’s gonna be good.


2 posted on 08/17/2007 10:48:19 AM PDT by Allegra (0....I am on R&R -in the FREE western world! Yeeeeehaaaaaa!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Without these guys, where would the laughs be?


3 posted on 08/17/2007 10:50:35 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
The World Tyranny Ruling Elite needed Paul to appear to finish near the bottom

Bwahahahaha!

4 posted on 08/17/2007 10:51:43 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
What a bunch of idiots.. the entire premise of this, that it is a federally mandated vote, is bogus as this was a poll, and thus, their entire argument.

The funniest thing I read on some blogs during the straw poll was from Paulites who came from out of State complaining they couldn’t vote and ‘borrowing’ other’s IDs to vote.

5 posted on 08/17/2007 10:51:46 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

How true.


6 posted on 08/17/2007 10:51:54 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
7 posted on 08/17/2007 10:52:11 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom, Bible Thumper and Proud to be an American! RUN, FRED, RUN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
Ted Sporer, Chuck Laudner, Mary Tiffany, Craig Robinson, and Chairman Ray Hoffman.

This seems to be a smoking gun. This will be the greatest and most irrefutable proof ever that a Diebold computer was used to rig an election!
 

Keep on slandering..... you're only adding to the damages.

8 posted on 08/17/2007 10:53:53 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Here is a chance for you to help your hero out.


9 posted on 08/17/2007 10:53:58 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

I’m sending my five bucks to Bev Harris as we speak...


10 posted on 08/17/2007 10:54:07 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Tell me again what the difference is between a Ron Paul supporter and a leftist moonbat?


11 posted on 08/17/2007 10:55:26 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Comments? Observations?


12 posted on 08/17/2007 10:55:32 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
Tell me again what the difference is between a Ron Paul supporter and a leftist moonbat?

Easy: unlike Paulestinians, leftist moonbats enjoy the taste of imported shrimp.

13 posted on 08/17/2007 10:56:54 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
Voter fraud in an unofficial straw poll that candidates participate in just to see where they stand.

Go sell crazy somewhere else Ron, we got plenty here.

14 posted on 08/17/2007 10:57:27 AM PDT by Domandred (Eagles soar, but unfortunately weasels never get sucked into jet engines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
I’m sending my five bucks to Bev Harris as we speak...

ROTFLMBO!!

15 posted on 08/17/2007 10:58:02 AM PDT by Hazcat (We won an immigration BATTLE, the WAR is not over. Be ever vigilant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Well.....it might be fun for Paul dectractors but even his strongest critics admit that he has nothing to do with encouraging this complaint, precisely the opposite. Now.....can we actually consider what Paul believes on the issues?


16 posted on 08/17/2007 11:00:04 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

17 posted on 08/17/2007 11:01:17 AM PDT by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
These idiots don't speak for Ron Paul, but they do undermine his campaign with their foolishness. For one thing, their assumption that, if there was fraud, it must have been entirely against Paul (because all the other candidates are in cahoots with the "moneymasters" presumably). Of course, those who already hated Paul's campaign will just have a convenient excuse to hate it more. How sad.
18 posted on 08/17/2007 11:02:05 AM PDT by marsh_of_mists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Romney Bought That Poll - Fair and Square


If Ron can't ride with the big boys - he shouldn't saddle up.


19 posted on 08/17/2007 11:02:50 AM PDT by One_who_hopes_to_know
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Domandred

Please provide evidence that “crazy Ron” had anything to do with this. Answer: you can’t because he has denounced this complaint. Now...if you want to smear Ron Paul because someone who supports him is “crazy”....then I suppose you’ll have to smear all the other candidates (including the one you back) in the same way. Are you willing to do this?


20 posted on 08/17/2007 11:03:50 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Well.....it might be fun for Paul dectractors but even his strongest critics admit that he has nothing to do with encouraging this complaint

Of course he encourages it.

He himself said that "if" there are questions about the voting, then "the questions must be asked."

21 posted on 08/17/2007 11:04:03 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
..can we actually consider what Paul believes on the issues?

I like to look at how someone actually votes, not what they 'say'.. so, let's look at how Paul actually votes..

Ron Paul's Voting Record

Here are some ‘Conservative(sic)’ votes by Paul:

(of course, Paulites have an excuse for each of these.. something about Paul making a point of State versus Federal or there must be something in the bill he didn' like or the bill smelled like shrimp.. yadda, yadda, yadda.. if they were votes by anyone else, they would use the votes to prove that person was a RINO.)

Voted NO on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes.

Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research.

Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion.

Voted YES on funding for alternative sentencing instead of more prisons.

Voted NO on more prosecution and sentencing for juvenile crime.

Voted NO on military border patrols to battle drugs & terrorism.

Voted NO on allowing school prayer during the War on Terror.

Voted NO on allowing vouchers in DC schools.

Voted NO on passage of the Bush Administration national energy policy.

Voted NO on implementing Bush-Cheney national energy policy.

Voted YES on barring website promoting Yucca Mountain nuclear waste dump.

Voted NO on speeding up approval of forest thinning projects.

Voted NO on reforming the UN by restricting US funding.

Voted NO on requiring lobbyist disclosure of bundled donations.

Voted NO on prohibiting lawsuits about obesity against food providers.

Voted NO on prohibiting product misuse lawsuits on gun manufacturers

Voted NO on prohibiting suing gunmakers & sellers for gun misuse.

Voted NO on decreasing gun waiting period from 3 days to 1.

Voted NO on emergency $78B for war in Iraq & Afghanistan.

Voted NO on $266 billion Defense Appropriations bill.

Voted YES on more immigrant visas for skilled workers.

Voted YES on providing $70 million for Section 8 Housing vouchers.

Voted NO on promoting work and marriage among TANF recipients.

Voted NO on treating religious organizations equally for tax breaks.

Let's also not forget Paul's Pork Projects (that he voted for before he voted against when he calls them unconstitutional but he is just playing the game when he submits them because everyone else does it.. yadda yadda yadda..)

22 posted on 08/17/2007 11:04:13 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Answer: you can’t because he has denounced this complaint.

Oh, please document that one.

23 posted on 08/17/2007 11:04:49 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Answer: you can’t because he has denounced this complaint.

Is this like how he 'denounced' 9/11Truthers yet continues to frequent their radio programs and give them interviews?

24 posted on 08/17/2007 11:05:40 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

Methinks thou are on the wrong thread. This one has much more....well, offerings.


25 posted on 08/17/2007 11:05:53 AM PDT by bcsco ("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Wrong. The difference between Paul and leftist rightest big government moonbats like Romney, is that Paul has the best record (according to National Taxpayers Union) of voting against spending and taxes than any other member of Congress.


26 posted on 08/17/2007 11:06:39 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Paul has the best record (according to National Taxpayers Union) of voting against spending and taxes than any other member of Congress

See post 22 for Ron Paul's left wing voting record.

27 posted on 08/17/2007 11:08:10 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
Break out the popcorn...Heck, this rates a bourbon! But only one :)
28 posted on 08/17/2007 11:08:59 AM PDT by bcsco ("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

The American Psychiatric Association is considering adding “Ron Paul Derangement Syndrome” as a variant manifestation of Delusional Disorder.


29 posted on 08/17/2007 11:08:59 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember (The ideal tyranny is that which is ignorantly self-administered by its victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Well.....it might be fun for Paul dectractors but even his strongest critics admit that he has nothing to do with encouraging this complaint, precisely the opposite. Now.....can we actually consider what Paul believes on the issues?

Oh, I long ago stated my opposition to Paul's issues - repeatedly. And my opinions were primarily met with personal insults from the Paulies.

I'm on vacation now. I'm just here for the fun.

You guys can be all serious and stuff if you want.

I'll get the popcorn going.

30 posted on 08/17/2007 11:09:10 AM PDT by Allegra (0....I am on R&R -in the FREE western world! Yeeeeehaaaaaa!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
I’m sending my five bucks to Bev Harris as we speak...

Ron Paul is only $10 away from winning the Iowa straw poll.

31 posted on 08/17/2007 11:10:04 AM PDT by bcsco ("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Bump for Entertainment!


32 posted on 08/17/2007 11:10:11 AM PDT by Artemis Webb (Ron Paul: the candidate of cowardice and appeasement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Cute but dishonest. Paul is a states righter, therefore he believes, for example, the states not the federal government should define marriage and abortion policy. He also rejects big government compassionate conservatism. Now....you may be an advocate of federal supremacy. That’s fine. Why not just be honest about it? The hard truth is that the National Taxpayers Union rates Paul at 90 percent or higher. Now other candidate in the race comes even close to that record.


33 posted on 08/17/2007 11:10:48 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
The American Psychiatric Association is considering adding “Ron Paul Derangement Syndrome” as a variant manifestation of Delusional Disorder.

There seems to be a lot of that going around on Free Republic and it's not from the Ron Paul supporters.
34 posted on 08/17/2007 11:13:24 AM PDT by marsh_of_mists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/ron_paul_teams_up_with_kucinich_to_end_war.htm

RP, Alex Jones, and Kucinich; on the “issues”.

35 posted on 08/17/2007 11:14:04 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy; pillut48
Without these guys, where would the laughs be?

They really are fun, aren't they?

When Paul crashes and burns somewhere early in the primaries, I'm going to kind of miss them.

Kind of like how you miss a nagging tooth that finally gets pulled. ;-)

36 posted on 08/17/2007 11:14:30 AM PDT by Allegra (0....I am on R&R -in the FREE western world! Yeeeeehaaaaaa!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

The Ron Paul loon-a-tics will be bombarding the internet with their vitriol and conspiracies

WE WUZ ROBBED !!!!! !!!!


37 posted on 08/17/2007 11:15:57 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Personal insults? My message had no personal insults....What is your point? Guilt by association? Believe it or not, not all Paul supporters, nor dare I say all supporters of your candidate, engage in personal insults. We also don’t use that fact to avoid dialogue.


38 posted on 08/17/2007 11:16:14 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Actually, the National Taxpayer’s Union most recent rating gives Paul a 84% which is below McCain (88%) and about the same as most of the other candidates running (with the exception of Hunter who rated 62%)

Paulites often misrepresent the Percent A’s score (which he is tied with Tancredo on) as his congressional rating. This is more a representation of how long he has been in congress more than being ‘tops’ every year. Considering Paul has been in congress since they started rating in 92 (few of the others have), even with his average percent in the 80s, he is naturally going to have a score for longer..

http://www.ntu.org/main/page.php?PageID=97


39 posted on 08/17/2007 11:16:25 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
I am so glad you made this point because this is a perfect example about how Paul cares more about the game than he does the issue. The abortion issue is a perfect example. Let’s contrast this with Fred (as I know you are also a Fredhead.)

Fred Thompson is a strong Federalist and his voting record shows it, yet, when some of the same Abortion issues came to his vote, he didn’t quibble with if it was a State or Federal right, he voted Pro-Life. He felt ending abortion was more important than making some point.

When faced with the same choice, Paul chose to not vote Pro-Life and instead, thought it was more important to make some State’s right point than actually do something that would save a life...

40 posted on 08/17/2007 11:18:22 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk; mnehrling
The hard truth is that the National Taxpayers Union rates Paul at 90 percent or higher.

The NTU (which consists of about 10 people, BTW), does have some kind of mystical power to decide who is or isn't conservative. They themselves aren't conservatives - their founder is a libertarian, not a conservative.

The NTU gives points to representatives for voting against defense spending, for example.

His NTU rating is one data point which has to be weighed against others - like his defeatism, his treasonous attitude and his liberal voting record.

41 posted on 08/17/2007 11:20:15 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Ping post #39, the Paulites actually misrepresent his rating from them.
42 posted on 08/17/2007 11:21:18 AM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
Using deodorant on Sundays...
43 posted on 08/17/2007 11:21:26 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Vote for the man who will keep those Barbary Pirates at bay, RON PAUL 1816!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Presumably you’ve no luck so far in documenting Ron paul’s alleged denunciation of these vote fraud lunatics?


44 posted on 08/17/2007 11:22:29 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Um, no...

One is known by the company they keep...

Or attract...

45 posted on 08/17/2007 11:23:04 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Vote for the man who will keep those Barbary Pirates at bay, RON PAUL 1816!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
I felt a ripple in the farce....


46 posted on 08/17/2007 11:24:19 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Vote for the man who will keep those Barbary Pirates at bay, RON PAUL 1816!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
These KGB/GESTAPO TYPES, groveling before the sinister banking powers in NYC and behind the RNC and the DNC, -- and acting as their enforcers in Iowa -- hid all the EVIDENCE (the ballots) at the Iowa Straw Poll and announced the alleged results based on their assertion alone – which the rest of us are supposed to take and believe on blind faith!

*****************

Wow. Straight out of the Democrat playbook.

47 posted on 08/17/2007 11:24:41 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

48 posted on 08/17/2007 11:24:53 AM PDT by NeoCaveman ("I mean, he's gone from Jane Fonda to Dr. Strangelove in one week." - Romney on B. Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Just talk to anyone in his campaign office. Geez....do I have to do all your work? But....since you can’t I’ll post a link in the next day or so.


49 posted on 08/17/2007 11:25:13 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

Code pink rates him a 96%, so what is your point?


50 posted on 08/17/2007 11:25:15 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Vote for the man who will keep those Barbary Pirates at bay, RON PAUL 1816!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 701-738 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson