Posted on 08/18/2007 1:37:28 PM PDT by LibWhacker
Astronomers have discovered a chaotic scene unlike any witnessed before in a cosmic "train wrecK" between giant galaxy clusters. NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory and optical telescopes revealed a dark matter core that was mostly devoid of galaxies, which may pose problems for current theories of dark matter behavior.
Astronomers have discovered a chaotic scene unlike any witnessed before in a cosmic “train wreck” between giant galaxy clusters. NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory and optical telescopes revealed a dark matter core that was mostly devoid of galaxies, which may pose problems for current theories of dark matter behavior.
"These results challenge our understanding of the way clusters merge," said Dr. Andisheh Mahdavi of the University of Victoria, British Columbia. "Or, they possibly make us even reexamine the nature of dark matter itself."
There are three main components to galaxy clusters: individual galaxies composed of billions of stars, hot gas in between the galaxies, and dark matter, a mysterious substance that dominates the cluster mass and can be detected only through its gravitational effects.
Optical telescopes can observe the starlight from the individual galaxies, and can infer the location of dark matter by its subtle light-bending effects on distant galaxies. X-ray telescopes like Chandra detect the multimillion-degree gas.
A popular theory of dark matter predicts that dark matter and galaxies should stay together, even during a violent collision, as observed in the case of the so-called Bullet Cluster. However, when the Chandra data of the galaxy cluster system known as Abell 520 was mapped along with the optical data from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope and Subaru Telescope atop Mauna Kea, HI, a puzzling picture emerged. A dark matter core was found, which also contained hot gas but no bright galaxies.
"It blew us away that it looks like the galaxies are removed from the densest core of dark matter," said Dr. Hendrik Hoekstra, also of University of Victoria. "This would be the first time we've seen such a thing and could be a huge test of our knowledge of how dark matter behaves."
In addition to the dark matter core, a corresponding “light region” containing a group of galaxies with little or no dark matter was also detected. The dark matter appears to have separated from the galaxies.
"The observation of this group of galaxies that is almost devoid of dark matter flies in the face of our current understanding of the cosmos," said Dr. Arif Babul, University of Victoria. "Our standard model is that a bound group of galaxies like this should have a lot of dark matter. What does it mean that this one doesn't""
In the Bullet Cluster, known as 1E 0657-56, the hot gas is slowed down during the collision but the galaxies and dark matter appear to continue on unimpeded. In Abell 520, it appears that the galaxies were unimpeded by the collision, as expected, while a significant amount of dark matter has remained in the middle of the cluster along with the hot gas.
Mahdavi and his colleagues have two possible explanations for their findings, both of which are uncomfortable for prevailing theories. The first option is that the galaxies were separated from the dark matter through a complex set of gravitational "slingshots.” This explanation is problematic because computer simulations have not been able to produce slingshots that are nearly powerful enough to cause such a separation.
The second option is that dark matter is affected not only by gravity, but also by an as-yet-unknown interaction between dark matter particles. This exciting alternative would require new physics and could be difficult to reconcile with observations of other galaxies and galaxy clusters, such as the aforementioned Bullet Cluster.
In order to confirm and fully untangle the evidence for the Abell 520 dark matter core, the researchers have secured time for new data from Chandra plus the Hubble Space Telescope. With the additional observations, the team hopes to resolve the mystery surrounding this system.
These results are scheduled to appear in the October 20th issue of The Astrophysical Journal. Other members of the research team included David Balam (University of Victoria) and Peter Capak (California Institute of Technology).
NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Ala., manages the Chandra program for the agency's Science Mission Directorate. The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory controls science and flight operations from the Chandra X-ray Center in Cambridge, Mass. CFHT is a joint facility of National Research Council of Canada, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique of France, and University of Hawaii.
L
Calling Dr. Who! Calling Dr. Who! This needs “The Doctor”.
Maybe all dark matter is not created alike...
What if we and all of our perceived world are nothing but designs of an advanced computer game, played for mild amusements between important matters, such as lunch and dinner and the lastest on the holograph screen? lol
It seems like the more we know about the universe the less sure we are that we truly do. There is today's understanding, and tomorrow's new discoveries.
Very interesting to follow...
Huh?
There is today’s understanding, and tomorrow’s new discoveries.
Very true for the field of astronomy.
“Dark matter”....piffle and nonsense.
100 years from now it will bring a chuckle.
Thanks...
Ping for later. Thanks for the post.
So now we have dark matter, dark energy, and double-dark energy?
Al sharpton and jesse jackson, please pick up the white courtesy phone!
Someone’s talking about something being “dark” and chaos.
we need to demonstrate against these scientists!
Thanks for the link. I’ll check it out...
Essentially every observational test of it beyond the orbit of pluto has turned out to be false, empirically. At every scale, an entirely new theory is "needed" to patch it back up. The rational inference, instead, is that the Einstein doctrine of the equivalence between gravitation and space curvature is a decent approximation within the sun's moderate gravity well and over relatively short distances, but never was literally correct.
Thanks!
ping for possible interest : )
It makes me chuckle now.
The theory is that 90% or so of the universe is this 'stuff' that is only affected by gravity and nothing else.
But if 'dark matter' is affected by gravity and 90% of the space around our planet is 'dark matter' how come tons and tons of the stuff isn't falling on my carpet? Why isn't my vacuum cleaner getting heavier by the day?
Hell, why aren't we being crushed by the thousands of tons of 'dark matter' which should be falling to Earth?
Well then they say that dark matter is only 'out there'. What are the odds of that?
This 'dark matter' theory is a bunch of malarky.
L
Dark matter is a mathematical crutch. It doesn’t exist in the physical world.
Nothing. It's creating its own space as it goes. That's why [some] scientists are confident that if and when they are able to recreate the conditions of the Big Bang (i.e., actually cause another Big Bang) -- and some say we'll be able to do this real soon -- in the laboratory, it won't hurt us at all.
A few seconds after the new Big Bang, this newly created universe will have as much mass in it as our universe and be as large as the Milky Way, creating its own space as it goes, hyperexpanding but not intruding into our universe in the least.
LOL, I'm not making that up! I read an article recently that said as much. (But don't ask me to explain it further!) :-)
Just kidding! That's what I imagine it's like whenever I read about it, lol.
We mortals, specks of matter in a vast cosmos, we creations, we humans. When will we come to understand that we can never comprehend the incomprehensible. The Creator will teach us when He deems it appropriate.
A professor says that there’s probably a 20% chance that we are just in a simulation game. It explains why bad things happen— because those things make the sim more interesting to the creator.
Yep.
L
There are three main components to galaxy clusters: individual galaxies composed of billions of peanuts, hot caramel gas in between the galaxies, and dark matter, a mysterious chocolate substance that dominates the cluster mass and can be detected only through its gravitational effects.
It’s all a matter of perspective.
“common sense dictates...”
LOL
“So why was the ball there, and how did it get there? What formed it? What was there before the ball was there? And all of that. “
That is the essence of God.
There was a Bullet Cluster thread a couple weeks ago. Much commentary although the mystery was not solved. Maybe this time.
That's where the train gets off the track. It was not floating, and there was no nothingness.
“no nothingness”
Wouldn’t that then be somethingness? :)
The ether of our times.... and just about as likely to be true...
The absence of everything. The problem with somethingness is that in order to understand the being of something our minds require nothingness to give the contrast, and sadly, we as human beings cannot conceptualize the absence of everything because our very conceptualization is something.
Drat, what bad luck! We are hot wired to be deterministic and so require a minimum of two events interacting in order to produce a third.
The sound of one hand clapping is God.
I wouldn’t go that far. I think it’s a matter of poorly understood terminology and ignorance of the true nature of the universe on our part.
The guy who was suprised that he couldn’t see the dark matter was a laff riot, though.
Of course you can’t see it. It’s dark.
Duh.
Thanks. Too bad this was posted on a weekend. A good discussion of things that can’t be seen and can’t be defined is always good for the soul, if not a few laughs.
Hey, guys, “we see through a glass darkly.” That includes telescopes.
Only for aristotelians.
Wrongo, radioman, you must adhere to the semantics of your reasoning. One fundamental aspect of God is inherently necessary to our definition of God, i.e. as a first cause. This is to say that if a something, as opposed to a nothing, creates another something then it follows that he finds some-thingness better to create than more nothingness.
And we are something.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.