Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Mitt]Romney, [Fred]Thompson tie for straw poll victory
August 19, 2007 | Dan Shaw

Posted on 08/19/2007 4:22:16 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

http://www.jconline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/ELECTION01/708190344

Due to copyright issues, link only....


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana; US: Massachusetts; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: 2008; electionpresident; elections; fredheads; frednecks; fredthompson; gop; in2008; indianagop; indianaprimary; midwest; mittheads; mittromney; paulbearers; paulestinians; reaganesque; republicans; ronpaul; runfredrun; strawpoll; theweatherchannel; tippecanoecounty; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

I had a straw poll at my house last night. My wife and I tied with each of us garnering 33% of the vote. My cat also got 33%. There were three total votes cast. Since our totals only come up to 99%, we’re thinking about filing a lawsuit claiming voter fraud. Where is that other 1%???


41 posted on 08/19/2007 8:50:04 AM PDT by Nathan _in_Arkansas (Shut the deuce up!!! I'll do the fighting!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nathan _in_Arkansas

Contact one of the FR Paulestinians, they’ll point you towards a civil rights lawyer/Reynolds aluminum foil dealer.


42 posted on 08/19/2007 9:00:56 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
And so is the CFR slam. Fred has admitted that backing McIsane-Feingold was a mistake.

Not only did he vote for it, but he bragged about co-authoring it. Anyone who thought he was doing the right thing in ignoring the constitution and voting to limit free speech is not a conservative. But he does play a conservative on TV.

43 posted on 08/19/2007 9:20:31 AM PDT by Nephi ( $100m ante is a symptom of the old media... the Ron Paul Revolution is the new media's choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion; George W. Bush; Condor51; Clara Lou; Jim Robinson
If Jim says something or some candidate (Guliani, in this case) is not conservative - and puts his foot down on the issue - then, at least on this site, Guliani ain't conservative.
Can't argue with that. It is his site. And notice, that I always only thought that my single recourse was to either go or stay. I never said anything about trying to change the rules here.

But anyway, you're points are well taken and eloquently stated.

As for Giuliani, although I do disagree with some of the conclusions regarding the difference between him and Hillary, I do accept the majority opinion here that he is no conservative. Why shouldn't I? I support Fred.

44 posted on 08/19/2007 10:21:27 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: skimbell
Go ahead and be s/. I have it from and insider (someone close to the campaign) that Fred plans to announce his candidacy on the 10th anniversary of 9-11.

You mean 2011?

45 posted on 08/19/2007 12:38:53 PM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah
It’s particularly disheartening to listen to the one-issue folks who aren’t going to be happy with any candidate that doesn’t agree with them 100 percent.

I have very, very rarely seen one-issue folks and 100%ers on this website. A good number of 95% and 90%ers, sure. The only one-issue people I can remember offhand were 2nd Amendment supporters and WOT enthusiasts.

Usually those "one-issue", "100%" tags are just canards used to shout down any opposition to some favored candidate with liberal positions.

46 posted on 08/19/2007 1:13:16 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (Romney : "not really trying to define what is technically amnesty. I'll let the lawyers decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Usually those "one-issue", "100%" tags are just canards used to shout down any opposition to some favored candidate with liberal positions.

Oh dear, you're not allowed to say anything so reasonable here. Don't force me to call the mods on you!

BTW, I am a one-hundred-percent 90%er personally.
47 posted on 08/19/2007 3:21:28 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
Indeed. At FR, those numbers represent a JUGGERNAUT for the elderly and frail ex-lobbyist and amateur senator FRed Thompson.

Dude, you are relentless! Cracks me up. But I still like Fred. And Mitt. And Ron Paul.
48 posted on 08/19/2007 3:25:12 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
What's JC's problem?

Psychosis induced by fear of Fred.

49 posted on 08/20/2007 1:35:00 PM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

The man you malign as elderly and frail is doing as well as your weatherboy without even declaring his candidacy.

No wonder you’re soiling yourself with fear.

Your insults and his lies about Ronald Reagan make for a really fine campaign. You must be so proud.


50 posted on 08/20/2007 1:37:57 PM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner; stand watie
Perhaps your pinglist would be interested in the latest Romney talking points:

...FRed Thompson. Why? Because he has a conservative sounding voice. (i.e., he speaks "southron," a kind of redneck ebonics).

Nice, huh?

51 posted on 08/20/2007 2:49:12 PM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
tell us. i'm interested.

fyi, i just HOPE Mitt's "seeing the light" on abortion is SINCERE. (may remind my readers that Saul of Tarsus was a PERSECUTOR of Christians, before he saw "the light on the road to Damascus"???)

free dixie,sw

52 posted on 08/20/2007 2:55:45 PM PDT by stand watie ("Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God." - T. Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: stand watie

Apparently the belief or claim is that a southern accent is some kind of “redneck ebonics.”


53 posted on 08/20/2007 3:22:09 PM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Petronski; stand watie
There are so many flavors of Southern accents - Appalachian, Virginian, Gulf-area, Southeastern/coastal Georgia/Florida, etc.

I enjoy all of them, as I do the accents of my friends from New Hampshire, Jersey, Minnesota, and other fine Northern states.

To say Thompson's accent is redneck-ebonics is funny, but pretty inaccurate. My granny from the great state of TN wouldn't take too kindly to that notion!

54 posted on 08/20/2007 11:08:08 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
of course.

don't you KNOW that all us southerners are PERMANENTLY INFERIOR to northerners??? at least according to the mainSLIME LEFTIST mass media we are & forever will be.

free dixie,sw

55 posted on 08/21/2007 7:42:45 AM PDT by stand watie ("Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God." - T. Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Petronski; JCEccles
What's JC's problem? Psychosis induced by fear of Fred.

He's your twin from another political camp.

56 posted on 08/21/2007 8:38:14 AM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

And meanwhile you’re so superior because you can’t decide, right?

/sarc


57 posted on 08/21/2007 8:44:08 AM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Why should I decide, when one of the supposed major contenders still hasn’t? I’m supposed to be more committed to the process than Fred?


58 posted on 08/21/2007 9:36:44 AM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird
Why should I decide, when one of the supposed major contenders still hasn’t?

That's a very naive assessment of events.

59 posted on 08/21/2007 9:39:23 AM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Made my decision regarding Paul, McCain, Guiliani, and Tancredo. Still weighing Romney and Hunter. If and when Fred declares and gives me some data besides scripted youtube bits, op eds and fanboi hagiographies, I’ll weigh him as well.
60 posted on 08/21/2007 10:27:24 AM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson