Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Latest Polls Show Giuliani and Even Fred Thompson Beating Clinton
Intellectual Conservative ^ | August 19, 2007 | Rachel Alexander

Posted on 08/19/2007 8:27:08 PM PDT by az4vlad

The presidential election is still over a year away, and Republican approval ratings are lower than ever with the President's approval rating averaging 32.9%, but the latest polls are already beginning to show Giuliani beating Hillary in hypothetical matchups in the general presidential election. According to key campaign website realclearpolitics.com, two out of the five most recent major polls have Giuliani beating Hillary, and one has Fred Thompson beating Hillary. A Battleground poll taken in the middle of July shows Giuliani beating Hillary by 6 points, and a Rasmussen poll taken at the end of July has Giuliani winning by 1 point. Another Rasmussen poll shows Thompson beating Hillary by 1 point. Pundits like Dick Morris have been saying all along that Hillary can't win because her negatives are too high - around 44% in most polls.

In hypothetical matchups between Obama and Giuliani, Obama fares better than Hillary, with Giuliani losing every hypothetical except for one tie. However, there are fewer and fewer people who believe Obama can beat Hillary in the Democrat primary, and he's trailing Hillary by double digits in every poll. A recent Newsweek poll shows him trailing by 21 points. Obama's inexperienced gaffes the last couple of weeks over foreign policy set him back considerably; for the Democrat party machine, it's hard to get excited about a candidate who makes you look stupid for supporting him. Plus any Democrat would have a difficult time fighting the Bill Factor - Bill Clinton was the last most powerful man in the world, and one of the best-loved Democrats; with Bill campaigning for Hillary and working everyone from the base to the wealthy contributors, any Democrat is going to have a difficult time counteracting that. Obama is a nice distraction from the Clinton political machine because he's a fresh-faced opposite of Hillary, but he's not a realistic solid candidate; Democrats just have to picture him debating the quick and brilliant Rudy Giuliani to realize he'd lose big in a general election.

If the momentum continues this way, we're headed for a Giuliani-Hillary presidential race, and certain victory for Republicans because of Hillary's high negatives. Republicans who revere Ronald Reagan remember the more recent Clinton years even better, and will never forget Whitewater, Hillarycare, Monica Lewinsky, and the most corrupt administration ever.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts; US: New York; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: 2008polls; election; electionpresident; elections; fredthompson; giuliani; gop; hillaryclinton; president; republicans; rudygiuliani; runfredrun; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-62 next last

1 posted on 08/19/2007 8:27:12 PM PDT by az4vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
From the article:
"Pundits like Dick Morris have been saying all along ..."


2 posted on 08/19/2007 8:30:54 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
The presidential election is still over a year away

That's what is depressing - twelve more months of this crap...

3 posted on 08/19/2007 8:31:05 PM PDT by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
Rasmussen has Guiliani beating Clinton by 7; Clinton beating Thompson by 3:

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/in_surge_giuliani_now_tops_clinton_by_seven_points

4 posted on 08/19/2007 8:32:08 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad

Wait until early next month when Fred Thompson announces! Money will flow into his campaign coffers and the polls will spike even higher, IMO.


5 posted on 08/19/2007 8:34:28 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: az4vlad
For the Democrat party machine, it's hard to get excited about a candidate who makes you look stupid for supporting him.

Too bad they can't realize that this is the effect that ALL of their candidates have on them.
7 posted on 08/19/2007 8:40:03 PM PDT by RepublitarianRoger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
That's what is depressing - twelve more months of this crap...

I'm already thinking about taking a month-long vacation ending the day after election day '08. I'd love to be away from this stuff until I can just turn on the news and find out who won.

Maybe I'm just getting old, but this stuff no longer interests me, the horse race, I mean. I'm more concerned with everything BUT the crap the media seem most interested in.

8 posted on 08/19/2007 8:40:55 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Any Republicans around here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

That is EXACTLY how we lose.


9 posted on 08/19/2007 8:46:44 PM PDT by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad

Is there any poll which shows the percentage of women who will vote for The Hildabeast?


10 posted on 08/19/2007 8:47:28 PM PDT by Digger (If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Wait until early next month when Fred Thompson announces! Money will flow into his campaign coffers and the polls will spike even higher, IMO.

I think that Fred Thompson will get a spike in the polls when he announces that will dissipate over a couple of weeks and we'll be right back where we are now. When the campaign begins in earnest, Giuliani and Thompson will be the top two candidates. The Ron Paul supporters will be trumpeting a third place finish in the Mineral County Bauxite Festival Days straw poll and how that indicates a tide wave of coming support.

11 posted on 08/19/2007 8:48:27 PM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad

These poll results are good, but what isn’t reflected is the fact that prez elections are not by popular vote, but by electoral votes. We need to win whole states. This is a good start.


12 posted on 08/19/2007 8:48:55 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They have pissed it all away. He is waiting until the summer season of LA Law is over. FRED knows it’s going to be difficult. He gets my vote.


13 posted on 08/19/2007 8:51:33 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad

I just checked the domain name www.ihatehillary.com.

It lists “ejaculation control” as a prime link.

Makes sense to me.


14 posted on 08/19/2007 8:52:18 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

I know how you feel. It feels like it’s not about the nation anymore, with the MSM, it’s a game to them. And to the politicians. I’ll be voting of course, but I don’t have much faith in any of them right now. It doesn’t seem like any of them are about the nation and the country, just winning the position.


15 posted on 08/19/2007 8:54:20 PM PDT by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

Ron Paul already won the Harrison County Future Farmers of America pig calling, straw poll and bake-off (Mrs. Paul’s apricot tarts took Honorable Mention).


16 posted on 08/19/2007 9:02:38 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

“The Ron Paul supporters will be trumpeting a third place finish in the Mineral County Bauxite Festival Days straw poll and how that indicates a tide wave of coming support.”


Made me laugh my A** off PING!!!!

Thanks


17 posted on 08/19/2007 9:08:04 PM PDT by County Agent Hank Kimball (There are two kinds of people: those who divide people into two categories, and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad

“Democrats just have to picture him debating the quick and brilliant Rudy Giuliani to realize he’d lose big in a general election.”

I don’t think so. Democrats will vote for Hillary regardless of how she does in debates, and frankly I don’t think Rudy will be as impressive as lauded. He will come across as rude and arrogant. That won’t sell.

The Republican party can’t win with Guilani. It needs someone else with more impecable conservative credentials to shore up the conservative base of the party. I have voted for every Republican nominee since Gerald Ford ran against Jimmy Carter (I was only enthusiastic about Reagan, and both Bush candidcies), but I did vote for my parties nominee. I WILL NOT EVER VOTE FOR RUDY....NEVER.

I don’t think folks take statements like mine in ernest, but I won’t back down. I cannot support Guilani, even if it means a Clinton victory.

Either the party puts someone resembling a conservative (on Abortion, Homosexuality, and the 2nd Ammendment) or they won’t get my vote. I will leave that portion of the ballot blank or vote for a third party candidate if conservative by my tests.

Personnally I would like the see Huckabee, Hunter, or Thompson to a lesser degree (I think he is too friendly towards homosexuals). Heck, I am at the point where I would like to see Gingrich jump in the fray. Just no Rudy the homophilic, infanticidal, gun grabber.


18 posted on 08/19/2007 9:11:14 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
(Mrs. Paul’s apricot tarts took Honorable Mention)

Mrs. Paul makes fish sticks, or as my grand daughter and I call them....stish ficks.

19 posted on 08/19/2007 9:12:49 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
20 posted on 08/19/2007 9:18:43 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom, Bible Thumper and Proud to be an American! RUN, FRED, RUN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble
That is EXACTLY how we lose.

By not listening to the media, we lose? Wha--?

21 posted on 08/19/2007 9:27:10 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Any Republicans around here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad

I want Hilary to win the democratic primaries. She is the easiest candidate to beat. A lot of her own party can’t stand her. More importantly swing voters will be scared away and she will do more than anything else could to drive out Republican voters.


22 posted on 08/19/2007 9:31:27 PM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

Never say never.


23 posted on 08/19/2007 9:31:32 PM PDT by Maynerd (Bush is trying to sell a "War on Terror" against a "Religion of Peace." Confusing isn't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pillut48
" Hillary is fatally flawed"

Look on the bright side....

Anyone that can balance on two pillars of cankle while head bobbing and simultaneously avoiding eye contact can't be that bad.

24 posted on 08/19/2007 9:35:53 PM PDT by spokeshave (Hey GOP...NO money till border closed and criminal illegals deported)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
“... this stuff no longer interests me, the horse race, I mean. I’m more concerned with everything BUT the crap the media seem most interested in.”

It’s like Gresham’s Law; only in this case bad reporting is driving out good reporting.

The overuse of polls, in order to create a “horse race” is just plain bad reporting. It’s beyond slothful and moronic — it allows anyone to “report” on an election, regardless of how little they know about the issues. “Good reporting” would, at a minimum, have something to say about the issues, or the character and abilities of the candidates. (Good reporting would also be “fair and balanced” — but, that’s way too much to hope for any more.)

25 posted on 08/19/2007 9:45:21 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Mrs. Paul’s apricot tarts took Honorable Mention).

...but how did her fish sticks turn out?

26 posted on 08/19/2007 9:49:02 PM PDT by A_Tradition_Continues (THE NEXT GENERATION CONSERVATIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Outstanding, on-target observations.

I have no trouble ignoring the news these days because the "news" is no such thing. I simply read my last "story" that was actually reporting some poll. That's not news, that's an analysis of an imperfect poll of a few people, and indicative of nothing (I've known two people who made their living at polling and was long ago completely disillusioned about their usefullness).

If The News were actual reporting of facts, I'd be back in my News Junkie mode. I watched the news CONSTANTLY for years, and then I learned a little more about it, and BOOM. How many times do I have to hear about some stupid poll in the year leading up to an election?

27 posted on 08/19/2007 9:53:01 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Any Republicans around here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a388b90a11676.htm

VINCE FOSTER - The Mirage of Suicide and The Reality of Murder

Crime/Corruption Opinion (Published) Keywords: VINCE FOSTER, MURDER, ASSASSINATION, DEATH, CLINTON
Source: The Secret Life of Bill Clinton Book/Variety of Books and Articles
Published: 1997 (Book) and Variety of Dates Author: By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard and Variety of Authors
Posted on 01/23/2000 15:37:05 PST by Uncle Bill


28 posted on 08/19/2007 9:55:13 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All

I like your enthusiasm.

Don’t any of you read doug from upland’s posts? It is a factor that the press is ignoring and many of them know about it.


29 posted on 08/19/2007 10:01:50 PM PDT by hoosierpearl (To God be the glory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad

Sounds from other polls that Giuliani’s momentum is going down (not up) with Republicans, and that Hillary’s momentum is going down with the general electorate.


30 posted on 08/19/2007 10:02:09 PM PDT by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562436/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

Would you swallow hard and vote for Romney?


31 posted on 08/19/2007 10:03:55 PM PDT by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1562436/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

I’ve been in close physical proximity to Rudy. Only guy I’ve sensed so much arrogant selflove coming out of is Pete Rose...


32 posted on 08/19/2007 10:06:01 PM PDT by 185JHP ( "The thing thou purposest shall come to pass: And over all thy ways the light shall shine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet
I think that Fred Thompson will get a spike in the polls when he announces that will dissipate over a couple of weeks and we'll be right back where we are now.

He announces Jan 28, then sweeps MegaTuesday - don't you love it when a plan comes together?

33 posted on 08/19/2007 10:29:30 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Despise not the Jester. He is often the only one speaking the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
I do believe September 17th is CONSTITUTION DAY. What a grand to announce, don't you think?

America. Together. Again
Fred Thompson for President '08
J.C. Watts Delivering the Republican Party response to President Bill Clinton's "State of the Union" Address (1997)
"America needs to be a place where all of us can feel a part of the American dream. But it will not happen by dividing us into racial groups. It will not happen by trying to turn the poor against the rich. It will not happen by asking Americans to accept what is immoral and wrong in the name of tolerance."

34 posted on 08/19/2007 10:50:02 PM PDT by papasmurf (<<<<< Click there to see my dogs! Oh, and I have FRed one liners, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble; Darkwolf377

“That is EXACTLY how we lose.”

As bad as it is, we must be vigilant.


35 posted on 08/20/2007 12:02:38 AM PDT by Rick_Michael (The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

We scheduled a Caribbean cruise right for after the 2000 election, and it was just horrible not knowing who won! Those of us who were pubbies met in furtive bunches and, in whispers, asked anybody with a newspaper what was happening, while a Florida election official and her hubby (obviously Democrats) with whom we shared a lunch bemoaned loudly that she couldn’t be there to “help” and wasn’t it “too bad” that Clinton couldn’t run for a third term. Aiyee! My hubby probably had gouge marks in his leg from my fingernails so that I could control myself from screaming at them, LOL!


36 posted on 08/20/2007 5:02:17 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (Don't make me use my caps lock button!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
Sola,

I don’t think folks take statements like mine in ernest, but I won’t back down. I cannot support Guilani, even if it means a Clinton victory.

We take you in "earnest" {even if you can't be bothered using spell checker} but it just makes you as illogical as a demonRAT.

You prefer the bitch to Rudy and yet claim to be conservative. Can't be supported with logic.

Rudy is not my choice, but if he wins the pubbie nomination, and I am faced with Rudy or the beast, I cannot stand by and let kankles become the President of the United States. It makes no sense.

37 posted on 08/20/2007 5:15:15 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

It most certainly can be supported with logic.

Rudy Giuliani has stood against and continues to stand against everything the conservative movement in this country stands for. The Republican party is the only right of center party in this country. Nominating Rudy Giuliani to be the de facto head of that party would bring about the destruction of the Republican party and the conservative movement. It would give us two left of center parties in this country, which is unacceptable to me.

Electing Rudy Giuliani to win this battle is winning a battle to lose a war. That’s just dumb. I’d rather lose in the short term and still have a fighting force to regroup and come back another day.

If that is what people wish to do, I can’t stop it. I can, however, refuse to take part in it.


38 posted on 08/20/2007 6:05:07 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (President Hunter should appoint Senator Katherine Harris to his cabinet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
Bump! IT'S FRED TIME!!

http://Vets4Fred.net It's time for Vets to sign up!

http://FredForPresident.com

39 posted on 08/20/2007 6:11:20 AM PDT by W04Man (I'm Now With Fred http://Vets4Fred.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
“.. Pundits like Dick Morris have been saying all along that Hillary can’t win because her negatives are too high - around 44% in most polls.”
This is only half right. lil dick says the beast will win because she will bring out females that have never voted before. He stupidly assumes ALL of them will come out to vote FOR the beast, which a child knows is wrong. So on alternate days he says she will win and she will lose. That lil dick pronouncement must have been made on an odd day because on even days he says she will win. He can’t even seem to get the beast’s negative number right. It’s not 44%, it’s closer to 50%.
40 posted on 08/20/2007 6:13:08 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Liberals are "American aliens." They were born IN America but they are not OF America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm
Rudy Giuliani has stood against and continues to stand against everything the conservative movement in this country stands for.

Everything? You mean like lower taxes, conservative judges, a strong military, a crackdown on criminals...

I'm sure that 8 years of the bitch will make you feel vindicated that you sat out the election because the pubbie candidate wasn't "pure" enough for your high standards. You stated your "opinion" not logic based on facts, as the "facts" that you point to are not really facts, kinda like the demonRATs.

41 posted on 08/20/2007 6:14:55 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: USS Alaska
Everything?

Yes. Everything.

You mean like lower taxes

I don't believe for one second that he'd lower any taxes.

conservative judges

I don't believe for one second that he'd appoint any conservative judges. There is no evidence to support that he would either. In fact, there's plenty to the contrary.

a strong military

For use against whom? Rudy Giuliani has shown every sign of being everything that the left likes to fantasize that Bush is.

I'm sure that 8 years of the bitch will make you feel vindicated that you sat out the election because the pubbie candidate wasn't "pure" enough for your high standards.

Such arguments are so intellectually vapid. You're actually contending that if I don't vote for Rudy and tell you now that I won't that I'll somehow be responsible for Hillary getting elected? How silly.

I can make an equally silly argument and tell you that if you insist on voting for Rudy in the primaries and force me to have only those two choices, YOU are therefore responsible for electing Hillary Clinton. How bout that? I hope you're happy with the pain and suffering that you have caused with your possible future actions in this regard.

You stated your "opinion" not logic based on facts, as the "facts" that you point to are not really facts, kinda like the demonRATs.

I'm sorry. I didn't realize we were talking over your head here. I assumed that you would be able to carry on a discussion somewhat above the level of your average preschooler on this particular subject. My mistake. You know what they say about assumptions...

All any of us are doing is stating our opinions about things, yourself included. It just so happens that your opinion is on par with that of an under educated five year old. Unfortunately, I can't help you with that.

44 posted on 08/20/2007 7:28:29 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (President Hunter should appoint Senator Katherine Harris to his cabinet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
One day the democratic luns will wake up and remember that the only thing they liked about Bill Clinton is that he won the presidency. If Hillary can't win, then they will bail on her.

For Obama to win the nomination, he needs to make it absolutely clear he will not be Hillary's VP! The camp was moving there 2 weeks ago but got diverted to cover his recent gaffs.

If Obama continues to tank, look out Algore.

The only reason Newt will enter the race if he believes Hillary will win the democRATic nomination. Her negatives are as high as his so he believe he can beat her. He will only get the Republican nomination if Thompson does not get off the ground.

45 posted on 08/20/2007 8:32:06 AM PDT by 11th Commandment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth

“Would you swallow hard and vote for Romney?”

Nope, I won’t ever again vote for a mormon. Made that mistake once and lived to regret it.


46 posted on 08/20/2007 10:36:56 AM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jellybean; girlangler; KoRn; Shortstop7; Lunatic Fringe; Darnright; babygene; pitbully; granite; ...
PING!!

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference

WARNING: If you want to join, be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.

47 posted on 08/20/2007 1:03:15 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad

Related...

http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com/2007/08/unwinnable-hill.html


48 posted on 08/20/2007 1:06:02 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

“That’s what is depressing - twelve more months of this crap...”

Yeah : )


49 posted on 08/20/2007 1:08:21 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“(Mrs. Paul’s apricot tarts took Honorable Mention).”

I thought she did the fish?


50 posted on 08/20/2007 1:28:13 PM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super Walmart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson