Posted on 08/19/2007 10:09:23 PM PDT by doug from upland
How much did this transformation cost her? Yes, this really is the same person.
Spewing Hate on the Internet, Anonymous, With No Accountability
Sunday , August 12, 2007
By Susan Estrich
Most mornings, my assistant goes through my e-mail before I do, culling out the ones that are simply vicious, vindictive and mean, so I don’t have to see them.
Our rule is that threats get reported to the police, while mere ugliness just gets deleted. But once in a while, I get up early or she gets in late, and I make the mistake of clicking on messages I just shouldn’t see. It ruins the morning, and then some.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I put out the challenge for Susan to speak with Juanita. Juanita was absolutely ready to do it. Unfortunately, Estrich refused. Susan, as a fellow rape survivor, you know that if you met Juanita and heard her story face to face, you would know she was telling the truth. You can't afford to know the truth. How could you then support Bill and Hillary?
Well, Susan, it is not over. You are going to be challenged again.
Silk purse, meet sow’s ear.
can’t polish a turd
I haven’t seen this hack in ages. Last time I saw her she was predicting Kerry would win Ohio. After that prediction she seemed to head for Ft. Marcy Park, but she is back.
Hey, Susan, compare notes on ‘hate mail’ with Ann Coulter and Peggy Noonan some time, and quit your whining!
The Dims hate the Internet just like the USSR hated Soltzeneitzen. The Truth is like a Cross to a Vamp...well a Liberal.
They always preach Church and State except when they are cramming their Religion down our Throats.
Pray for W and Our Troops
Actually, I don't think so. She certainly is made up well in the picture on the right but she has had some major reworking done to her face.
FWIW, everyone in the public eye gets hate mail. I’m an obscure peon at a small town paper, yet every few months, a multi-page, single-spaced screed appears in my mailbox, stuffed into an envelope that can barely contain the venom within.
It goes with the territory.
Did she fall face first into a bucket of plaster?
I feel no empathy for Susan Estrich. She is a hater right up there with Larry O’Donnell who shouted down John O’Neill.
I have a long memory Susan...
this writing is just susandearest trolling for something to pile on FR with......that already-failing eleanor rigby face doesn’t even begin to cover the hate within her
And a time machine.
Hate speech is pretty subjective. Screaming hate speech can also hide ulterior motives, like censoring anyone who disagrees with you no matter how logical and articulate they are.
It's okay for her assistant to see hateful messages, but it just ruins the morning for Estrich to see them.
-PJ
BUMP
-PJ
What I don’t understand is how she can talk about the ugliness on the Internet(and btw, just about everywhere else)when she promotes it. Talk about denial.
LOL
In the cases on which this book focuses, the man is not the armed stranger jumping from the bushes—nor yet the black man jumping the white woman, the case that was most likely to result in the death penalty prior to 1977, and the stereotype that may explain in part the seriousness with which a white male criminal justice system has addressed “stranger” rape. Instead the man is a neighbor, an acquaintance, or a date. The man and the woman are both white, or both black, or both Hispanic. He is a respected bachelor, a student, a businessman, or a professional. He may have been offered a ride home or invited in. He does not have a weapon. He acted alone. It is, in short, a simple rape.
Susan Estrich, Real Rape
Years ago, I used to actually have very civil and meaningful discussions with her when she had a weekend talk show on KFI in Los Angeles. Her liberal callers hated me. On two occasions she did an hour for her listeners to call in and answer, “Why I hate Doug from Upland.”
Doug, I gotta hand it to you, you are one persistant dude. Outstanding!
Regards
The dems have zero interest in the truth as long as people like estrich pander to their lies.
Dave Schippers sent a Chicago rape specialist policewoman to visit Juanita. She was literally frightened because she knew Juanita was telling the truth.
I’m guessing here, but maybe Susan doesn’t think rape is a big deal. Maybe, if she was even telling the truth (about her own victimization), she liked it. Otherwise she would give Mrs. Broaddrick a fair hearing - from one victim to another. Right?
Personally I think she’s a fraud.
Quite clever. Wrong jar.
She will not speak with Broaddrick because it would rock her political world. Facing the fact that her friend is a rapist is something she cannot let herself face.
When I think of Hillary Running for President, her ideals are the most apparent problem. But what worries more, is the fact that the criminal element will be back within the White House. The Dixie Mafia and all their sordid connections will be plugged back in.
Estrich is merely one spinner among many that will be back in a position of power.
As for the truth, you can’t tell me they don’t know Bill Clinton is likely a rapist and a nephew to the Dixie Mafia. They know. They also know what another Clinton administration means to the nation.
I would like to think the US Citizen would be too smart to allow these people back in, but who knows.
I know a woman who was raped and I can tell you rape victims belong to an exclusive club where not even another woman can comprehend the enormity of the brutality involved. Susan - in my book - is a liar. Regardless of her politics.
No... Correction: She’s a damned liar. Just like her idol Bill.
stepping back in time...
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44451
BOOK EXCERPT
“The rape of Juanita Broaddrick
Chapter from ‘Their Lives’ tells of woman’s horrifying encounter with Clinton”
Posted: May 26, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
SNIPPET: “Editor’s note: Candice Jackson’s explosive new book, “Their Lives: The Women Targeted by the Clinton Machine,” tells, like never before, the stories of Kathleen Willey, Juanita Broaddrick and others who have suffered from the actions of William Jefferson Clinton.
In this excerpt from the book, Jackson comprehensively covers Broaddrick’s story of being raped by Clinton, tells of her own experience being sexually assaulted and explains how she believes American liberalism encourages the forcing of the will on others.”
By Candice E. Jackson
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
“Often, very often actually, the subject of their ire isn’t even anything I say, but the mere fact that I say it or write it on Fox News.”
Doug, she’s not complaining about being hatefully attacked by conservatives. She’s getting hate mail from vicious moonbats. The left is attacking her because she’s on Fox, and we all know Fox is the only things the left hates more than Rove or Bush. Or Christians.
Actually, this is not an airbrushed photo. Susan’s had extensive plastic surgery, it appears. She looks just like the photo on the right, as when she appeared last week on Hannity and Colmes, subbing for Colmes. To be honest, it’s a vast improvement. Too bad she can’t have plastic surgery on her voice though. Still sounds like a raspy nail on a chalkboard. But she truly does look better, as best she can.
The same thing happened, to a lesser extent, to Greta Van Sustern, when she first came to Fox. She too, in honesty, looked a lot better when they got done with her. However, neither woman was a raving beauty to start with, to say the least, so improvement is a relative word. However, both had a problem in the looks department and chose to improve what they could. For that I give both of them credit, and I like the change, especially considering what the starting point was.
I saw her subbing for Colmes the other night. She was yet again reiterating some nonsensical point and her voice went deep and demonic to stress what she wanted to say, I thought she sounded ‘possessed’. The woman has issues to say the least.
She didn’t look ‘as good’ (if there is such a thing for her)as the airbrushed looking photo herewith...just her hair looked ‘re-done’.
Needs editing. Are those all books, or are some of those subtitles?
Soulless
The Case for Hillary ClintonHow To Get Into Law School
Sex & Poweretc.
She looks like Chrissy Matthews with lipstick!
No resemblance to the Real lipstick wearing Chrissy Matthews...
Two things:
(1) I saw her on Hannity and Colmes last week and it seemed to me that her face was stretched so tight that it actually caused her to have difficulty speaking. I’m not kidding, either. Her voice was way distorted from its usual three packs of Lucky Strikes before breakfast rasp.
(2) Didn’t she have an emotional meltdown on one of the Fox shows because of her own rape? I don’t recall the incident clearly, but I think it was either that she was a guest and something just hit her hard, or she was watching and had to call in or get herself made a guest a day or two later. Regardless, it continues to astound how women, no, check that, staunchly feminist women of the any unwanted attention is rape/any involvement with a subordinate is sexual harassment ilk, enthusiastically make themselves Bill Clinton’s exoskeleton.
estrich’s face as flawed and fake as her arguements!!!!
Notice her ears are no longer visible. They are now at the 2 and 10 o'clock position.
She probably could have had a bit more work done but, if she had, she would have ended up with a goatee and a 'beauty mark' on each cheek. :=)
LOL
LOL!! I’ll keep that one.
I’d hit that.
I always thought Susan Estrich had enough brains to be conservative if she could pry herself away from the Dark Side.
And sober up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.