Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Investment in Failure (Thomas Sowell)
Townhall.com ^ | August 21, 2007 | Thomas Sowell

Posted on 08/20/2007 9:36:18 PM PDT by jazusamo

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

It is not just in Iraq that the political left has an investment in failure. Domestically as well as internationally, the left has long had a vested interest in poverty and social malaise.

The old advertising slogan, "Progress is our most important product," has never applied to the left. Whether it is successful black schools in the United States or Third World countries where millions of people have been rising out of poverty in recent years, the left has shown little interest.

Progress in general seems to hold little interest for people who call themselves "progressives." What arouses them are denunciations of social failures and accusations of wrong-doing.

One wonders what they would do in heaven.

We are in no danger of producing heaven on earth but there have been some remarkable developments in some Third World countries within the past generation that have allowed many very poor people to rise to a standard of living that was never within their reach before.

The August 18th issue of the distinguished British magazine "The Economist" reveals the economic progress in Brazil, Argentina, and other Latin American nations that has given a better life to millions of their poorest citizens.

Some of the economic policies that have led to these results are discussed in "The Economist" but it is doubtful that members of the political left will stampede there to find out what those policies were.

They have shown no such interest in how tens of millions of people in China and tens of millions of people in India have risen out of poverty within the past generation.

Despite whatever the left may say, or even believe, about their concern for the poor, their actual behavior shows their interest in the poor to be greatest when the poor can be used as a focus of the left's denunciations of society.

When the poor stop being poor, they lose the attention of the left. What actions on the part of the poor, or what changes in the economy, have led to drastic reductions in poverty seldom arouse much curiosity, much less celebration.

This is not a new development in our times. Back in the 19th century, when Karl Marx presented his vision of the impoverished working class rising to attack and destroy capitalism, he was disappointed when the workers grew less revolutionary over time, as their standards of living improved.

At one point, Marx wrote to his disciples: "The working class is revolutionary or it is nothing."

Think about that. Millions of human beings mattered to him only in so far as they could serve as cannon fodder in his jihad against the existing society.

If they refused to be pawns in his ideological game, then they were "nothing."

No one on the left would say such things so plainly today, even to themselves. But their actions speak louder than words.

Blacks are to the left today what the working class were to Marx in the 19th century -- pawns in an ideological game.

Blacks who rise out of poverty are of no great interest to the left, unless the way they do so is by attacking society.

The poverty rate among black married couples has been in single digits since 1994 but the left has shown no more interest in why that is so than they have shown in why many millions of people have risen out of poverty in Latin America or in China and India.

Where progress can be plausibly claimed to be a result of policies favored by the left, then such claims are made.

A whole mythology has grown up that the advancement of minorities and women in America is a result of policies promoted by the left in the 1960s. Such claims are often based on nothing more substantial than ignoring the history of the progress made prior to 1960.

Retrogressions in the wake of the policies of the 1960s are studiously ignored -- the runaway crime rates, the disintegration of black families, and the ghetto riots of the 1960s that have left many black communities still barren more than 40 years later.

Whatever does not advance the left agenda is "nothing."

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of Basic Economics: A Citizen's Guide to the Economy.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: leftagenda; progressives; sowell; thomassowell

1 posted on 08/20/2007 9:36:21 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Democrat wish list:

Defeat in Iraq.

Stock market crash.

Massive hurricane somewhere.

(really, they want that)


2 posted on 08/20/2007 9:37:48 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Communist China: Walmart's answer to that pesky 13th Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger; Alia; Amalie; American Quilter; arthurus; awelliott; Bahbah; bamahead; bboop; ...
*PING*
Thomas Sowell

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Recent columns
Tragic Implications
Housing Crash: Give Politicians Most Of Blame
A Bridge Too Far Gone

Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Thomas Sowell ping list…

3 posted on 08/20/2007 9:38:20 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The Left is invested in failure because keeping people feeling upset and unfulfilled is the only way they can attract followers.

Good Sowell, as usual. Many thanks for the post.


4 posted on 08/20/2007 9:38:37 PM PDT by JennysCool ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

You’re correct and it’s my pleasure.


5 posted on 08/20/2007 9:44:18 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

bump


6 posted on 08/20/2007 9:49:53 PM PDT by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Add to your list another terrorist attack in the U.S., so they can blame Bush.


7 posted on 08/20/2007 10:04:07 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Great one. Jaz! Damn, but I'd love to buy Dr. Sowell a beer!
8 posted on 08/20/2007 10:16:33 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Hiya, Smooth. I’d like to be there when you do and I’ll buy the second round. Dr. Sowell never misses!


9 posted on 08/20/2007 10:18:35 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
their interest in the poor [is] greatest when the poor can be used as a focus of the left's denunciations of society.

Once again, Mr. Sowell's wisdom puts him in a league of his own. Remember these words. They explain so much.

10 posted on 08/20/2007 10:24:07 PM PDT by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irv
their interest in the poor [is] greatest when the poor can be used as a focus of the left's denunciations of society.
Once again, Mr. Sowell's wisdom puts him in a league of his own. Remember these words. They explain so much.
I pulled that quote too, but I think the phrase, "the left's denunciations of society," deserves discussion. IMHO the left is defined by Theodore Roosevelt in his famous dictum,
"It is not the critic who counts . . . the credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena
The left promotes itself by criticizing anyone who opens himself up to second guessing by taking responsibility and working to a bottom line. That includes not only businessmen but police and the military.

But notice who it does not include. First and foremost, it does not include journalists. No, journalists are "objective." And it does not include unionists, plaintiff lawyers, nor teachers/professors (other than the rare conservative, of course). IMHO journalists are the linchpin of leftism, because it is they who apply positive labels to themselves and to those who agree with their attitude toward actually getting in the arena.

The fact that leftists second guess others unmercifully but demand that they themselves be judged not by the results of their concrete actions but by their putative "good intentions" is obviously possible only because they are on the side of "objective" journalism. Note that I did not assert that journalism is in "liberal" politician's pocket - it is the other way around. "Liberal" politicians operate on the premise that getting good PR from journalism is the only thing that matters; they have no other principle worthy of the name.

Hence my tagline:

The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.

11 posted on 08/21/2007 3:38:45 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

BTTT


12 posted on 08/21/2007 3:40:19 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agammemnon dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah; Mind-numbed Robot; Zacs Mom; A.Hun; johnny7; The Spirit Of Allegiance; ...
Ping to my #11

Why Broadcast Journalism is
Unnecessary and Illegitimate

13 posted on 08/21/2007 3:46:04 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

BTTT


14 posted on 08/21/2007 4:02:39 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Because in the end, it is not about the poor, it is not about the blacks or minorities, it is only and always about the ability of liberals to gain personal, selfish power to control the lives of others.


15 posted on 08/21/2007 5:40:25 AM PDT by Obadiah (Nothing says, "Get off my lawn" like the inscription of a claymore - THIS SIDE TOWARDS THE ENEMY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Thanks for the ping.

Whatever does not advance the left agenda is “nothing.”


16 posted on 08/21/2007 7:45:00 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
journalists are the linchpin of leftism, because it is they who apply positive labels to themselves

I work in IT at a newspaper. It has been noted on numerous occasions that the reporters have the biggest heads in the building. Many of them really believe that their work is crucial to society (whether they are any good at it or not, apparently).

Once, I expedited setting up an email address (a simple enough thing, but their paperwork was late) and was congratulated for "striking a blow for the first amendment." Seriously.

17 posted on 08/21/2007 10:56:10 AM PDT by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: irv; Obadiah; Mind-numbed Robot; Zacs Mom; A.Hun; johnny7; The Spirit Of Allegiance; ...
the reporters have the biggest heads in the building. Many of them really believe that their work is crucial to society . . .

Once, I expedited setting up an email address and was congratulated for "striking a blow for the first amendment." Seriously.

The First Amendment says nothing about journalism, it speaks of "the press." The difference?

The reality is that journalists (and fellow travelers whom journalists label "liberals" or "progressives") systematically promote the idea that journalism is identical with the public interest. The rules of journalism - "If it bleeds, it leads," "'Man Bites Dog,' not 'Dog Bites Man,'" and "Always make your deadline," have nothing to do with what is or is not "the public interest," and everything to do with interesting the public, which is a different (and frequently contradictory) matter entirely.

Journalism interesting the public is in the business interest of journalism, so equating "interesting the public" with "the public interest" amounts to identifying the public interest with the business interest of journalism. And that is pretty much the sum of the historical reason for the Spanish American War - to say nothing of sundry other aspects of American history.

Why Broadcast Journalism is
Unnecessary and Illegitimate


18 posted on 08/21/2007 1:22:36 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

BTTT


19 posted on 08/21/2007 1:41:50 PM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah


Great tagline!
20 posted on 08/21/2007 1:50:00 PM PDT by wjcsux ("You leave out God, and you substitute the devil."- Winston Curchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I once wrote a great blog entry (which next to no one read) in which I stated that the UN depended on dysfunctional governments to justify itself and if it really wanted to do good for the nations it would have to ensure its own demise (by promoting the health of developing governments).

Well, I said it much better then.

21 posted on 08/21/2007 2:19:38 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Hate me, I'm white.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion; jazusamo

Thanks for the ping/post.

Outstanding article by Thomas Sowell! One of his best. Thank you Thomas Sowell! Thanks for posting.


22 posted on 08/22/2007 2:44:06 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
One wonders what they would do in heaven.

I assume this is purely a rhetorical question.

23 posted on 08/22/2007 7:15:47 PM PDT by Rocky (Air America: Robbing the poor, and still unable to stay in business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson