Skip to comments.Stephon Marbury Comments On Vick
Posted on 08/22/2007 5:04:23 AM PDT by PurpleMan
Stephon Marbury, NBA star, "...You know, from what I hear, dogfighting is a sport. It's just behind closed doors."
(Excerpt) Read more at wjbf.com ...
NBA players are saying that the felony of dogfighting is just sport. Your league is continuing to implode.
Any comment, David?
And here I thought Stephon Marbury was a cultured and refined individual...
I think he has a point. Are we allowed to kill animals or not?
What part of dog-fighting being a felony do you not understand?
Dog fighting is considered cruelty to animals and rightfully so.
You’re absolutely right. I know hunters who shoot the legs out from deer and then slash them with razors until they die a slow, painful death.
When I catch a fish, especially a short, I make sure that I rip the hook out of its guts before I throw it back to die.
If I can’t keep it, why should I let it live?
Deliberate cruelty is horrendous and inhuman.
I eat meat. I love fishing. Anyone who cannot understand the difference between killing a chicken for food and betting on cockfights is too dense to understand anything.
Me, too. I think it was the tatoos on his neck that made me think that.
You are not allowed to fight dogs in Virigina and there are serious penalties if you should.
From the article...’it’s unknown how it will affect his football career.’
Uh...how about ‘over’.
I’ve known Stephon since his high school days. My niece was a cheerleader at Lincoln H.S. when he was playing.
He was an idiot then. He’s an idiot now. And he descends from a long line of nitwits.
The most important quality for a winning point guard is gray matter. NY Knicks fans had the privilege of watching Walt Frazier ply his trade on that same hardwood. Stephon is a disgrace. If Isiah lets this last outrage stand without comment he should be run out of town... along with James (Sonny Boy) Dolan.
“No team will ever contend for a championship with Stephon Marbury playing point.”
That’s not me talking. That’s former team mate Tom Gugliotta.
BTW: Isiah and Dolan should be run out of town regardless.
We are not allowed to torture them or otherwise intentionally inflict pain on them for our jollies.
People who do torture animals and hurt them for fun are people who will do the same to their fellow human beings given the opportunity.
Dog fighting is considered cruelty to animals and rightfully so.”
Well, guess there are gonna be a whole bunch of rural kids locked up as felony perp’s for fighting ole Fido. As a dog lover and owner for all of my life, I do not condone being cruel to animals. “However”, dogs as with other domestic animals, are private property. As such, the owner has a right to kill these animals. Now, electrocution, drowning, banging a dog’s head against a concrete wall does seem somewhat excessive. But, is this actually against the law? Those of us who were raised on farms and ranches are well aware of what happens to dogs that run cattle,especially those that are pregnant, chase milk cows, kill chickens, eat eggs, etc, etc. The answer for you city dwellers is shot dead in the head. Actually, when we cut to the chase on Vick's crime(s), the only thing he is guilty of is the gambling component.
Marbury at his most eloquent.
WE do not hang, electrocute or slam dogs into the ground. WE don’t take little puppies or stray dogs and feed them to fighting dogs for bait and to get a taste for flesh. WE are not allowed to run an illegal operation which not only includes canine abuse and murder but illegal gambling, drugs, money laundering, etc.
True. But they should be criminally prosecuted only when they do harm human beings, not private property.
You think of Marbury vs. Walt Frazier. I think of Allen Iverson vs. Dr. J or Mo Cheeks.
Class is gone.
“He was an idiot then. Hes an idiot now. And he descends from a long line of nitwits.”
He could compete in the “Twit of the Year” competition
Really. Cruelty to humans? That’s a misdemeanor.
I think he has a point. Are we allowed to kill animals or not?
Just another example of how deep the erosion of our freedoms have become. Women have the “right” to choose to murder their unborn children while property owners cannot use their property in ways they deem appropriate. We slaughter cows, pigs, chickens, etc. at our whim by the millions while Vick can’t fight legally purchased dog’s on his own legally purchased property. What business is it of government what he does with his dog’s on his land?
I would never view or wager on a dog fight, but I believe in our private property rights to do so if we choose.
Can you not see the difference between killing an animal because it poses a threat of some kind, and torturing animals for fun?
It appears that on April 4 of this year, one sadistic SOB joined FreeRepublic.
“Actually, when we cut to the chase on Vick’s crime(s), the only thing he is guilty of is the gambling component.”
“I wonder why he plead guilty then?”
For gambling - duh. It “is” against the law to fight dogs for the purpose of gambling. Same with chickens, except in New Mexico I think. Until recently, it was legal to fight chickens in Oklahome too but I “think” it is now against the law there, but not sure.
Sorry. The view of animals as private property argument does not bestow the right to torture, maim, and abuse animals as you desire. Those of you who hold this position really ought to give it more thought (if possible).
And when he's gone, hopefully his stench won't linger too long.
Anyway, I think Vick should be shunned for being involved in such a heinous act, but people wanting this guy to go to prison for years upon years, I just can’t agree with. A little jail, fine. Shunned by the NFL, definitely. But he didn’t hurt a person or kill them as far as we know
Good point, but what out for the invading peta folks, I made pretty much same poiint in anouther thread yesterday plus with the point I felt bad for Vick for what he’s going through. Got chewed out.
I didn't know that making humans fight to the death was just a misdemeanor.
Trying to equate an animal to the private-property equivalent of a lampshade is just stupidity. You can do what you want with your lampshade. Spray-paint it, pee on it, cut it into little pieces, burn it - whatever you want to do to it. But you cannot do that to an animal. If you do, you are not only breaking the law but you are a sick bastard who deserves to be tied up, doused with blood and thrown into the middle of a pack of ravenous pit bulls.
I agree that there is a dichotomy here when it comes to abortion, but just because abortion happens to be legal in this country doesn’t mean that we should stoop to the same level when it comes to the treatment of animals.
Well, I detect a certain amount of “tongue in cheek” commentary in this string. However, concerning my comments I am attempting to make the point that those who live on farms and ranches and live and even depend on domestic animals for their livihoods have a different perspective when it comes to dogs than urban apartment dwellers - more pragmatic for sure. I won’t even bother to comment on cat lovers, not worth the effort...
In every case you bring up except pregnancy the dog has done something dangerous in order to warrant being killed, which is nothing at all like killing dogs for the fun of it.
If the dog is pregnant, it’s your own fault for not spaying it in the first place and you are just as evil as any other animal torturer when you kill it.
Dogs don’t fight to the death in dog fights. They fight until one quits or dies. I think Esquire did an article on it several years back.
You should be able to pick up a video called BumFights in your local rental shop
Dog fighting is considered cruelty to animals and rightfully so
In your opinion. You don’t own Vick’s dogs. I trust you understand that the domestic dog, if allowed to, would hunt you in packs and eat you for food, and would fight each other at will for the choicest piece of you.
Vick surely did not depend on these animals for his “livelihood”. Vick didn’t need to feed his buddies pit bull stew to survive. Vick wasn’t protecting the chicken coop from marauding packs of dogs. Vick is not a farmer, rancher, hunter, fisherman, etc. Vick is not a misunderstood victim of “city-dwellers” who simply don’t get how animals are treated by the rugged hearty types who populate the countryside.
You just took the bait from a n00bie troll and your inane comments will be posted and quoted on DU within the hour.
Dogfighting is illegal because the people of Virginia abhor cruelty enough that they've passed a LAW against it. Your comment about property rights is absolutely stupid in that context. What's next, your right to operate a crack lab "on your own property"?
The plural of "dog" does not have an apostrophe, btw. It's spelled "dogs".
“We play basketball, we wear tennis shoes.”
(Yes, he really said that. I stopped listening after that.)
He is guilty of breaking a law that is on the books as a felony-dog fighting.
He is guilty of breaking God's moral law regarding cruelty to animals.
The righteous man regardeth the life of his beast.(Pro.12:7)
So laws that punish cruelty to animals are just laws based on Biblical principle.
And dont' give me 'I wouldn't do that but he has a right to' nonsense.
If you condone that wickedness you are just as guilty as he is.
“Your league (NBA) is continuing to implode.”
......I feel the same way....and BTW anybody check out the prices these folks charge for their sorry product?...$600/game for a family of four!!!....here’s the price list for our local team....
Pit Bulls Break Into Home, Maul Woman
GIG HARBOR, Wash. Two pit bull terriers broke into a house through a pet door Tuesday and attacked a woman in her bed, mauling her badly, a Pierce County sheriff’s spokesman said.
The woman was able to grab a gun and try to shoot the dogs, then break away from the attack and lock herself in her car, where she called 911, sheriff’s spokesman Ed Troyer said.
The woman, who was not immediately identified, was taken to a hospital in Tacoma, where she was listed in serious condition.
Officers planned to talk to the dogs’ owner.
The pit bulls also killed a neighbor’s Jack Russell terrier, which entered the house during the attack, Troyer said.
“The thought is that the Jack Russell heard noise in the neighbor’s house, came in and was attacked by the dogs,” Troyer said.
Firefighters responded first, locking the dogs in the house, treating the woman and calling for an ambulance.
Officers “had to pepper spray and fight the dogs until they were detained. We almost had to shoot them on site,” Troyer said.
The dogs were taken to a Humane Society and will probably be destroyed, he said.
It was not immediately known why the dogs entered the house, whether the woman had dogs of her own or what set off the attack.
Who deserves more time in jail the owner of these dogs or Vick?
Sometimes I dispare for the Republic. Dilbert, suggest you re-read my comments. I was referring to the cow being pregnant not the dog. While re-reading my comments, perhaps you will note that I did not condone Vick’s vile acts. Merely made the statement that his methods of killing his dogs may not be illegal. Gezzz, if you're gonna get in the game, try to remember to wear your helmet...
Not my opinion, it is the law.
And as for dogs, they are domestic animals and help human beings.
Moreover, dog fighters steal pets from homes to use as 'bait' dogs, some of which they found in Vick's animal killing factory.
I think he's hiding under his bed.
For some FReepers, the leap from “should not be condoned” to “should be illegal” is very short.
I agree that cruelty to animals is repugnant and impolite. I agree that nobody should do it. I do not see why it should be illegal, however.
Why should it be illegal?
“We better get them before they get us!”
I suggest we allow good citizens like Michael Vick to keep pitting them against each other so we don’t have to fight them in our own homes!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.