US 'poised to strike Iran'

The Australian ^ | 08/25/07 | Geoff Elliott

[PreciousLiberty]

‘”What I’m getting is a sense that their sentiment is they are going to hit the Iranians and not just because of Israel, but due to the fact that Iran is the predominant power in the Gulf and it is hostile and its power is creeping into ‘he Gulf at every level,” Baer says.’

Sounds about right. I’ve been on board with this for months. =:-D

[ricks_place]

Recommended Actions

• Completely destroy Iranian Nuke Complexes
• Damage Iranian ability to Produce Oil for sale

Actions Accomplish Several Goals

• Eliminates the Iranian Nuke Manufacturing and Nuke threat.
• Disrupts the Iranian Rulers source of cash used for terror mischief.
• Destabilizes the Iranian Rulers hold on the government.
• Minimizes the risk to US Troops; God Bless Everyone of Them!
• Minimizes Collateral Damage to the Iranian People.
• A free Iran can resume oil sales

[jveritas]

Agree 100%.

[gotribe]

That was a loser movie. My wife, who’s not as politically biased as me but is a movie connoiseur, couldn’t even stand it for its lack of story line. A flick that will be forgotten, maybe already is.

[rwfromkansas]

There will be no strike. We have heard this for 5 years.

[rockthecasbah]

Mary O. McCarthy: disgraced former CIA official fired for leaking classified information. How can we ever win the WOT with people like this in our own ranks

[GladesGuru]

We didn’t bomb anyone! That plant had an explosion caused by:
1. Iran has no equivalent of OSHA
2. Iran has poor or non-existant quality control.
3. Iran shouldn’t have purchased fasteners from the same Chinese salesman that sold bogus AN bolts to the US Navy.

[PreciousLiberty]

“There will be no strike. We have heard this for 5 years.”

No, we haven’t.

Further, the dynamic has changed quite a bit. Iran is now our major enemy in Iraq. Plus, we can’t draw down forces there with Iran poised to dominate Iraq. Iran must be smacked down, hard.

As a side benefit, Iran’s nuclear program will be set back for years, if not indefinitely.

[GladesGuru]

We didn’t bomb anyone! That plant had an explosion caused by:
1. Iran has no equivalent of OSHA
2. Iran has poor or nonexistent quality control.
3. Iran shouldn’t have purchased fasteners from the same Chinese salesman that sold bogus AN bolts to the US Navy.

[HardStarboard]

>>>Bush and Cheney will not leave office with a nuclear Iran.

Bingo! Baer is working for his former CIA buds that are activly attempting to sabotage the Bush administrations possibilities of success in either Iraq or Iran!

I suspect Baer's article is a leading indicator of a coming ramp-up in Democrat efforts to tie Bush's hands on Iran. We have already seen some efforts along this line and they will amplify as we get closer to a drop-dead date where Bush has to make a decision.

[pacelvi]

STFU and do it already.

[Allegra]

We won’t completely settle Iraq down until Iran is dealt with.

[nuconvert]

“Bush and Cheney will not leave office with a nuclear Iran.”

Agree

[JerseyHighlander]

Bob "Circus" Baerker is at it again?

[Centurion2000]

but says he was told by senior intelligence officials that he had better get it published in the next couple of months because things could be about to change.

Wow, there's B$ and then there is this mountain of poo that this guy is pushing.

[rfp1234]

[hinckley buzzard]

its power is creeping into the Gulf at every level," Baer says.

Walid Phares says the same thing. He believes the flashpoint may be when Iran triggers an attempt at islamic takeover of Saudi Arabia and oil reserves. The US will have no choice but to go in.

[Paulus Invictus]

Make it so! If not, Israel may be lost and so will we later.

[RobbyS]

"What I'm getting is a sense that their sentiment is they are going to hit the Iranians and not just because of Israel, but due to the fact that Iran is the predominant power in the Gulf and it is hostile and its power is creeping into the Gulf at every level," Baer says.

[gonzo]

"...I suspect Baer's article is a leading indicator of a coming ramp-up in Democrat efforts to tie Bush's hands on Iran. We have already seen some efforts along this line and they will amplify as we get closer to a drop-dead date where Bush has to make a decision..."

Probably true, but the dhimmicRATS can't do jack-shit anymore regarding Bush without pissing in their own boots. I gotta hunch the 'September-Report' on Iraq is gonna be good news for Bush, and that could be very bad news for Iran.

It is kinda nice that all the dhimmis running for office, and all the ones in charge of the house and senate have spent so much political capital trying to get the USA defeated in the Middle East.

Now if they'll just hold off until after September 17th, I'll be happy ......................... FRegards