Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cabbie who figured in (Duke) lacrosse case sues
Herald-Sun ^ | August 30, 2007 | John Stevenson

Posted on 08/30/2007 5:09:23 AM PDT by abb

DURHAM -- Durham cabbie Moezeldin Ahmad Elmostafa is suing a department store chain and a security guard over a shoplifting charge that figured heavily in the now-ended Duke lacrosse case.

As it turned out, Elmostafa beat the shoplifting rap and was known among lawyers as the "hero of the lacrosse case" for becoming a defense alibi witness and standing up to former District Attorney Mike Nifong and Nifong's then-investigator, Linwood Wilson.

Nifong recently resigned and was stripped of his law license for misconduct in the lacrosse scandal. Wilson also lost his job.

Elmostafa's lawsuit was drafted by lawyer Tom Loflin and filed in Durham County Superior Court just before the close of business Wednesday.

The named defendants are Hecht's Company Inc.; May Stores X Inc, with which Hecht's is now merged; and Jonathan Massey, a former Hecht's security guard who originated the shoplifting charge against Elmostafa at Northgate Mall.

Attempts to reach the corporate defendants for comment were unsuccessful Wednesday evening. Likewise, someone at Massey's house said he was working and wouldn't be home until after midnight.

Defense lawyers had accused Nifong of belatedly bringing the misdemeanor shoplifting charge against Elmostafa as a pressure tactic in the controversial lacrosse case.

The alleged shoplifting incident was in 2003, but Elmostafa wasn't formally accused until May of last year.

The charge came shortly after Elmostafa signed a sworn affidavit saying lacrosse suspect Reade Seligmann was in Elmostafa's taxi around the time an exotic dancer claimed she was raped by Seligmann and two others during a party at 610 N. Buchanan Blvd. in mid-March 2006.

Elmostafa said he drove Seligmann to a bank machine, a fast-food restaurant and a Duke dorm.

When the shoplifting incident came up in court a year ago this week, Elmostafa testified that he merely gave a cab ride to a woman who later pleaded guilty to stealing several handbags from the Hecht's store at Northgate Mall. He claimed he didn't know what the woman was up to and didn't aid or abet her thievery.

Elmostafa was acquitted.

Nifong denied there was any connection between the shoplifting and lacrosse cases.

But lawyer Loflin contended Nifong had used the shoplifting incident "to gain a tactical advantage over [Elmostafa], to try to pressure him into changing his evidence to favor the prosecution in the lacrosse case."

Massey, the former Hecht's security guard, was accused in Wednesday's lawsuit of obtaining the shoplifting warrant against Elmostafa "maliciously and without probable cause."

Massey knew the allegations he was making against Elmostafa were false but made them anyway, according to the suit.

The suit added that Massey's actions "were done willfully, wantonly, intentionally and with actual malice, or with reckless disregard and [indifference] as to the truth and consequences of said actions. ..."

Hecht's and May Stores are "vicariously liable" because Massey worked for them, the suit said.

The lawsuit seeks compensatory and punitive damages.

Rape charges against the lacrosse defendants -- Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and David Evans -- were dropped by Nifong in December after the accuser changed her story. All remaining felony charges were tossed in April by state Attorney General Roy Cooper, who declared the three men innocent and rebuked Nifong for prosecuting them in the first place.

Today, Nifong is scheduled to be the defendant in a contempt hearing that could bring him a 30-day jail term and a fine of up to $500, or both. He is accused of lying about DNA evidence favorable to Seligmann, Finnerty and Evans.

URL for this article: http://www.heraldsun.com/durham/4-876754.cfm


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; durham; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last
Payback's a bitch...
1 posted on 08/30/2007 5:09:25 AM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abner; Alia; AmishDude; beyondashadow; Bitter Bierce; bjc; Bogeygolfer; BossLady; Brytani; ...

ping


2 posted on 08/30/2007 5:10:09 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Why isn’t Nifong IN JAIL??????????????????


3 posted on 08/30/2007 5:13:15 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

“Payback’s a bitch...”

Unfortunately it isn’t the City/County of Durham that’s being sued.


4 posted on 08/30/2007 5:16:35 AM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0 (Reunite Gondwanaland!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

This is beyond belief! They tried to intimidate the cab driver by a false charge to get him to retract his witness statement?

WOW! That is beyond it all....Nifong is worse than scum.


5 posted on 08/30/2007 5:16:43 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

And I hope it’s a big one. Wish him all the best.


6 posted on 08/30/2007 5:17:05 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Isn’t it a crime to knowingly make a false accusation of a criminal nature against someone to the police?.....


7 posted on 08/30/2007 5:18:51 AM PDT by Red Badger (ALL that CARBON in ALL that oil & coal was once in the atmospere. We're just putting it back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
and a fine of up to $500

$500?

8 posted on 08/30/2007 5:22:02 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
Rape charges against the lacrosse defendants -- Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and David Evans -- were dropped by Nifong in December after the accuser changed her story.

She's not anonymous. They should use her name -- especially if the journalist still wants to trumpet the names of the men who were accused of rape.

9 posted on 08/30/2007 5:22:52 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agammemnon dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
Nifong should be arrested for raping the legal system.
10 posted on 08/30/2007 5:25:58 AM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Crystal Gail Mangum

11 posted on 08/30/2007 5:28:18 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
They should use her name -- especially if the journalist still wants to trumpet the names of the men who were accused of rape.

We reporters can't remember her name that well and don't want to use (cough*Crystal Gail Mangum*cough) it unnecessarily, so as to protect her good name.(cough*Crystal Gail Mangum*cough)

12 posted on 08/30/2007 5:30:35 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dudoight

I don’t understand your outrage. This kind of stuff goes on in thousands of jurisdictions all over this country all the time. (see tag)


13 posted on 08/30/2007 5:31:12 AM PDT by Roccus (Say nothing...they know where you live!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: abb
"Payback's a bitch..."

And for those named in the suit, I hope the "bitch" is a high maintenance one, too.

14 posted on 08/30/2007 5:31:24 AM PDT by azhenfud (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Meanwhile, Nifong has his 9:30 am contempt of court hearing today before a judge to determine whether Nifong lied to the court on the DNA issue. He could be fined $500 and spend time in jail.


15 posted on 08/30/2007 5:39:24 AM PDT by TommyDale (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
Corection: This kind of stuff goes on in thousands of jurisdictions all over this country the world all the time.

America doesn't have a monopoly on this kind of stuff.

16 posted on 08/30/2007 5:39:59 AM PDT by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dudoight

This has been very common in North Carolina until now. I bet the District Attorneys around the state are rethinking this tactic.


17 posted on 08/30/2007 5:40:42 AM PDT by TommyDale (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dudoight

We knew that here at FR early on, at the time it occurred.

Needless to say, Nancy Grace did *not* cover it. Or pretty much anyone else in the MSM.


18 posted on 08/30/2007 5:49:19 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

They attempted to give Fonger all the help they could.


19 posted on 08/30/2007 5:54:30 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
If any part of your comment can be proven then the whole system needs to be revamped. In addition any DA involved needs to be exposed.
20 posted on 08/30/2007 5:58:04 AM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998

I personally know people in North Carolina who have been railroaded. Since I am not a member of the criminal community, one must automatically assume it is worse in that segment of society. The laws here suck. Any idiot can file a false charge or sue any other idiot for absolutely nothing, then tie their lives up for years at great expense. The only people who win are the lawyers.


21 posted on 08/30/2007 6:06:14 AM PDT by TommyDale (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

That’s right. It sounds like the wrong target is being sued.


22 posted on 08/30/2007 6:12:45 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Sorry to hear you live in such a corrupt state. Maybe you should plan moving to a better state.


23 posted on 08/30/2007 6:22:05 AM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
The only people who win are the lawyers.

Exhibit A: John Edwards, North Carolina lawyer.

24 posted on 08/30/2007 6:24:46 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998

Knowing that it is corrupt is actually an advantage. I feel sorry for the poor saps who don’t know their rights, or are afraid to fight back. Many of us here knew what was going on at Duke long before it was a newsworthy story. Having the financial means to fight back is what saved them.


25 posted on 08/30/2007 6:25:10 AM PDT by TommyDale (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sue Perkick

THANK YOU SUE!


26 posted on 08/30/2007 6:27:15 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

But will it save Nifong?


27 posted on 08/30/2007 6:37:04 AM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998

Nifong should have never been appointed to begin with. All he had done was “fix tickets” in traffic court for the DA’s office. He is a weasel that deserves fines, jail and civil lawsuit judgments against him.


28 posted on 08/30/2007 6:39:27 AM PDT by TommyDale (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: abb
Elmostafa

He lives in Sesame Hood, just a few blocks away from his well known cousin.
29 posted on 08/30/2007 6:42:09 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Maybe the Fong should consider a different career. Like driving a cab.


30 posted on 08/30/2007 6:43:30 AM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Why isn’t Nifong in jail?

Heck, I want to know why Crystal Mangum, a/k/a Precious, is not in jail. She started it all.


31 posted on 08/30/2007 6:59:12 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

I agree. This case had previously been handled and the thief was in jail. It was not the store that revived it after the cabbie came forward as a witness in an important case.


32 posted on 08/30/2007 7:11:09 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Isn’t it a crime to knowingly make a false accusation of a criminal nature against someone to the police?.....

You can bet your last dollar that the police, under Nifong's direct orders, used every trick and lie in the book to pressure the security guard to make his false accusation.

33 posted on 08/30/2007 7:32:50 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JLS; Rb ver. 2.0

Yep. It couldn’t have been more obvious what was going on here. Maybe Elmostafa is just getting started.


34 posted on 08/30/2007 7:38:08 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

“Unfortunately it isn’t the City/County of Durham that’s being sued.”

I’m surprised they aren’t. They should be!


35 posted on 08/30/2007 7:40:08 AM PDT by toldyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sue Perkick

“....Maybe Elmostafa is just getting started.”

Hope so. Weren’t we all in disbelief when this guy was arrested?


36 posted on 08/30/2007 7:43:44 AM PDT by toldyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: abb; All

Wait a minute. This story, and the comments here, make little sense.

Don’t get me wrong — Nifong got, and is getting, everything he deserves, and the cabbie is a true hero. No question there.

But he suing Hechts here, not Nifong.

And where is the nexus, somehow implied in the comments here, that Hechts was somehow actively and intentionally ASSISTING Nifong by bringing the complaint to the police?

If Hechts thought they had a criminal case, and they did, their role was to bring the facts to the prosecutor. The prosecutor then determines whether charges should be brought.

If the prosecution was brought for malicious leverage, it was Nifong and the police who were exercising the leverage, not Hechts.

Of course, Hechts is the target because it has the deep pockets. Is that what is being applauded here, then? That’s misplaced, IMHO.


37 posted on 08/30/2007 7:54:36 AM PDT by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toldyou

Absolutely. I remember thinking maybe now the media would start to get it. But they didn’t care. He got the same treatment from them as the boys. I was really afraid at that point they would all be in prison before this got worked out if it ever DID. It was scary.


38 posted on 08/30/2007 8:01:32 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay
"...a few blocks away from his well known cousin."

LOL

Would that be Erniestafa?

jw

39 posted on 08/30/2007 8:09:04 AM PDT by JWinNC (www.anailinhisplace.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
There is lots more to the story than is presented here. Read this thread at Liestopper's to catch up.
40 posted on 08/30/2007 8:11:04 AM PDT by MrEdd (Keeping my foot on the necks of liberals since 1980.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: abb

So Nifong is guilty of two counts of false and malicious prosecution. Why he isn’t in jail tells me that our “justice” system is broken.


41 posted on 08/30/2007 8:13:23 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

I went to the site you referenced. it reinforces, not alters, the points I made above.

The store brought the facts about the cabbie to the prosecutor/police LONG BEFORE the Duke incident with the stripper. In fact, the Statute of Limitations is even alleged to have run out.

What Nifong edid was go back and find the stale/old allegations, unrelated in an way to the Duke stripper incident, and then brought these stale charges against the cabbie, in obvious retaliation for the cabbie assisting the accused student in exonerating himself.

So — my point — what did HECHTS do wrong here? They weren’t colluding or assisting Nifong’s wrongdoing.

Can you show me where Hechts has dirty hands in this?


42 posted on 08/30/2007 8:19:14 AM PDT by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Leftism is Mentally Deranged

His hearing is taking place right now on CourtTV. So maybe he will be soon. We can only hope.


43 posted on 08/30/2007 8:19:30 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
The warrant appears to have been amended at the time of Elmo's actual arrest - long after the original charges were resolved. Hecht's security employee did the amending.

No tears for Hecht's.

44 posted on 08/30/2007 8:23:37 AM PDT by MrEdd (Keeping my foot on the necks of liberals since 1980.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
Yeh, I'm not following the logic here either. This was an outstanding warrant/accusation from 2003 or 2004, not something filed at the request of Nifong or during the timeframe of the LAX "scandal".

I also wonder if he's past the timeframe in which he could have sued Hechts anyway. This is at least three years old.
45 posted on 08/30/2007 8:32:07 AM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel
the time for statute of limitations didn't start running until the warrant was closed - after Elmo's trial. Elmo is comfortably in statute.
46 posted on 08/30/2007 8:35:56 AM PDT by MrEdd (Keeping my foot on the necks of liberals since 1980.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Dudoight

This is beyond belief! They tried to intimidate the cab driver by a false charge to get him to retract his witness statement?


IIRC the cab driver is a LEGAL immigrant and they threatened deportation.


47 posted on 08/30/2007 8:36:47 AM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

Maybe someone from the DA’s office approached the security guard at the height of the rape situation and asked him to help revive the shoplifting charge. It’s obviously not out of the realm of something Nifong would do.


48 posted on 08/30/2007 8:38:29 AM PDT by Tex Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

I still think he has a tough road ahead tying Hecht’s to this. The security guard seems to have done this, on his own accord, well after the shoplifting incident had been resolved in court. If he ammended his statement, and lied on the witness stand(which it appears he did), I don’t see how this is going to make Hecht’s liable. His employment does not matter if he perjured himself on the stand.


49 posted on 08/30/2007 8:40:19 AM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: abb

Oh you have GOT to be kidding me... Nifong is like the gift that keeps on giving...


50 posted on 08/30/2007 8:43:35 AM PDT by John123 ("What good fortune for the governments that the people do not think" -- Adolf Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson