Posted on 09/04/2007 4:14:50 PM PDT by wagglebee
By their own overinflated count homosexuals only comprise 10% of the population, this means that heterosexuality IS THE NORM.
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping lists.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Canada Ping
Education Ping
Speciesism? ROTFL! It just gets crazier and crazier.
This is not surprising since same-sex marriage is legal in Canada. So, it follows logically that any sex education or family life education type classes would be required to talk about homosexuality as an equivalent of heterosexual couples forming families.
I don’t disagree,...
but since when has logic been the strong point for any leftist indoctrination drivel?
I really don’t have a problem with NOT EXCISING the fact of a historically significant person was gay/bi, but if and only if such is somehow relevant to the curricular/ contextual treatment of that figure. And usually, a person’s sexual orientation just isn’t any reasonable part of the *reason why* he or she is historically important.
Example: Leonardo da Vinci was probably gay; Michelangelo certainly was. But in K-12 studies, is that likely to be genuinely worth mentioning? Probably not.
SPECIESISM??? Are we next going to see chimpanzees sitting next to humans in Vancouver high schools?
Where is the Canadian Prime Minister to call on schools to refuse this curriculum and for parents to remove their children until they do so? That is the only rational next course for him after this insanity.
[SPECIESISM??? Are we next going to see chimpanzees sitting next to humans in Vancouver high schools?]
Chimps, liberals, what’s the difference?
Always remember that those who claim to want to “treat animals like humans” really want to treat humans like animals.
Why is it necessary to mention every historical personality who might have been gay, when it is never mentioned that, for example, Johann Sebastian Bach was straight?
If I was a parent in Canada, I would rather have my child in a classroom with chimpanzees than with militant homosexuals.
Excellent point!
AGAIN, the queer agenda in academia rears its ugly head to be forced down the throats of kids. The indoctrination and force-feeding of radical leftist dogma just continues unabated in government school systems. If I had to educate mine over again, they would NEVER set foot in a liberal indoctrination camp. Just too many examples exist where if the government touches it, it turns to #$%@. Parents had better get involved in the public education process and get control of it SOON.
"Only 2.7% of men and 1.3% of women report that they had homosexual sex in the past year."
Time magazine reports on the study.
So why do these people continue to tell us that we shouldn't care what they do in the privacy of their own home, (which I don't), and then tell us what we should think about it?
Lots and lots of leading political and cultural figures through the ages were alcoholics and adulterers, too. Far too many to list here. And why are their lifestyles passed over in silence in the grade school classroom, as if they were irrelevant to their achievements-— or would some bigot be irrational enough to suggest that this behavior fell short of society’s norms?
Sigh. Guess I need a /sarc
Rampant Homophilia run amok
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.