Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Clinton ruled out running as HRC's VP (on tonight's Letterman)
The Drudge Report ^ | 09, 04, 2007 | Drudge

Posted on 09/04/2007 7:35:43 PM PDT by RDTF

Bill Clinton ruled out running as HRC's VP tonight during a taping of the CBS's LATE SHOW WITH DAVID LETTERMAN, sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT.

MORE

Dave: “Now there was a discussion last week, and there is I guess a greater discussion, and there’s some confusion, and maybe I’m the only one confused about the eligibility of a man who has been elected twice as President to possibly be named later on the ticket as Vice President. Constitutionally speaking, can that happen?”

Clinton: “I don’t believe so. There are some people who believe it can, and they have contorted readings of the amendment, the 22nd Amendment. But I believe as a matter of general interpretation, you’re supposed to read all the Constitution including all the Amendments as if they were written almost on the same day at the same moment, so they’re consistent with one another. And the Constitution says the qualifications for Vice President are the same as those for President. Now you can read that to mean ‘to serve,’ not ‘to run for.’ But I just don’t believe it’s consistent with the spirit of the Constitution for someone who’s been President twice to be elected Vice President. I just don’t think it’s Constitutional. I don’t think it’s right and I wouldn’t want to do that. I’d want to do whatever I could do to be of highest and best use for her, but there are lots of wonderful people out there, including all the people that are running this time would be good Vice Presidents. And, that’s just not in the cards.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; billary; clinton; hillaryveep; hillbillshow

1 posted on 09/04/2007 7:35:45 PM PDT by RDTF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RDTF

He is not eligible. Just why is this news to Liberals?

Because they do not read?


2 posted on 09/04/2007 7:39:36 PM PDT by TexanToTheCore (If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

He sounds like he got his knowledge of Constitutional Law from the back of a cereal box. What a bunch of gibberish!

But he’s right about one thing, he CAN NOT run again, for either office. And for that, America is grateful.


3 posted on 09/04/2007 7:42:02 PM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

what difference does it make? he’ll be in the whitehouse when she gets sworn in anyway.

she was “co-president” for two terms. isn’t she precluded from serving a third term? (she was allowed to make proclamations then, she’ll be able to make extra-constitutional proclamations when she gets elected one supposes.)


4 posted on 09/04/2007 7:43:06 PM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
Who was even asking such an idiotic question? Couldn’t be anyone from the U.S.
5 posted on 09/04/2007 7:44:06 PM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

“I don’t believe so. There are some people who believe it can, and they have contorted readings of the amendment, the 22nd Amendment.”

From the guy that wrestled with the definition of “IS”?


6 posted on 09/04/2007 7:45:09 PM PDT by james500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexanToTheCore

it’s heartening that insiders at Letterman are Drudge ‘sources’

*snicker*


7 posted on 09/04/2007 7:46:17 PM PDT by RDTF (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but Democrats believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

And besides, Hillary—whatever her other flaws, and they are legion—is not stupid. At least not stupid enough to put Bubba one of her heartbeats away from (a) another shot at the Presidency and (b) the opportunity to date with a clear conscience. Too much temptation.


8 posted on 09/04/2007 7:47:37 PM PDT by RichInOC (Hillary! 2008: Why Not The Beest?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: james500

Let me see, he’s been elected twice and he is from the same state as his wife. Pick a reason why, constitutionally, he can’t be VP.

Do they think we are all idiots?


9 posted on 09/04/2007 7:47:49 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (I am not from Vermont. I lived there for four years and that was enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

AW MAN! I was hoping Bill Clinton was eligible! < /extreme sarcasm >


10 posted on 09/04/2007 7:49:04 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Dave is what we call a sell out. When Clinton was Rapist-in-Chief, and getting Lewinskys in the Oral Office, Dave was pummeling him on nightly basis. He used to joke about Clinton jogging and his pasty white thighs and how Warren Christopher was mistaken for a yard gnome, and all kind of jokes about the blue dress. But now that Dave has sold out, he just cannot get enough kissing up to the pathetic likes Billy Boy.


11 posted on 09/04/2007 7:49:19 PM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Would he do her in the orval office?


12 posted on 09/04/2007 8:02:19 PM PDT by boomop1 (there you go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexanToTheCore
Because they do not read? They can read - fairy tales. They'd rather write another fairy tale and make it up as they go along than actually refer to the Constitution.
13 posted on 09/04/2007 8:06:37 PM PDT by ArmyTeach (Troops, we've got your back...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter

Dave is what we call a sell out.
____________________________________________________________

Not really - you can’t sell something you never had. Dave is a hard core liberal down to his bitter soul. Just look at his guest list for the past few weeks - every lib / rat needing some public exposure gets a forum, conservatives need not apply. Of course, it can be argued that the kind of folks who still watch Letterman are probably not the most informed voters in the world anyway - such a shame, I can remember a long time ago when Dave was actually funny.


14 posted on 09/04/2007 8:12:37 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Nope. Not gonna do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

I think the reason former President Clinton wouldn’t want to be Vice President is because his office would be subject to congressional oversight. I don’t see why he couldn’t be just as influential as a non-elected, non-appointed private citizen. When Bill Clinton tells Beijing at a dinner party that they can have Taiwan if they’d just sign President Hillary Clinton’s “Clean Air Treaty of 2010”, they can be confident he’s speaking for the President even if it’s not coming from a formal official.


15 posted on 09/04/2007 8:16:57 PM PDT by james500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
Do they think we are all idiots?

Letterman obviously thinks all his viewers are. He may be right at that.

16 posted on 09/04/2007 8:39:14 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Some Fat Guy in L.A.
In a good natured way, I am going to throw this back at you.

I can remember a long time ago when Dave was actually funny.

I would argue that was when he was funny, before he sold out. Dave was from Indiana, a very conservative state and he drew on that upbringing for his humor. Now he has been overtaken by the snobbishness of rich Connecticut elitism. Dave's humor used to be known as irreverent, and he made fun of all the pretense of show business, in a way biting the hand that fed him. At one time, Cher and Oprah publicly declared their dislike of him. That, is a good thing in my book. But no more, he sold out and he has kissed and made up with all that he offended. Late show hosts historically have not been very political. Jack Paar openly disdained politicians by saying he NEVER voted, it only encouraged them. Johnny Carson was able to walk the fine line of staying out of politics, the only exception being, when he understood that JFK was brought down by a conspiracy, and became very cozy with Jim Garrison, and then realized that was not wise career decision or career direction and dropped it like a lead balloon.

17 posted on 09/04/2007 8:40:19 PM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Do they think we are all idiots?

One word.... YES

Well maybe not US, but the stupes that would vote for “any klintoon” again really are stupid enough to say “AHH, too bad, guess we’ll just have to settle for hitlery”.


18 posted on 09/04/2007 9:04:06 PM PDT by dusttoyou (FredHead from the git go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

That’s funny, so didn’t the Constitution.


19 posted on 09/04/2007 9:35:07 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Brian J. Marotta, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub, (1948-2007) Rest In Peace, our FRiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

so did, that is.


20 posted on 09/04/2007 9:35:43 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Brian J. Marotta, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub, (1948-2007) Rest In Peace, our FRiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Klintoon could not be VP anyway. He’s Constitutionally ineligible. The Constitution clearly says that anyone who is not eligible for the office of President (as Klintoon is not, having served the maximum two terms) is not eligible for the office of Vice President.

Why don’t people understand this?


21 posted on 09/04/2007 9:53:37 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

.....oh geez........

Clinton was a failure. Her husband won’t help her new administration.

Get over it libs...


22 posted on 09/04/2007 9:56:37 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
Let me see, he’s been elected twice and he is from the same state as his wife.

The Constitution does not say that the President and Vice President cannot be from teh same state. It says that the electors from that state cannot vote for both of them. ("...one of whom, at least, shall not be from the same state as themselves.")

23 posted on 09/04/2007 9:57:34 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TBP

I guess I never read it that way. Oh well, you learn something new every day. I guess I AM an idiot!


24 posted on 09/05/2007 6:00:21 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (I am not from Vermont. I lived there for four years and that was enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Most people read it the way you did and that is its practical effect. But it’s not quite what it actually says.


25 posted on 09/05/2007 8:10:47 AM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TBP

I detest lawyers. Even framer ones. Why can’t people just say what they mean—or at least say it in a way that is understandable. I’ve probably read that 100 times, and never caught it.


26 posted on 09/05/2007 8:35:43 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (I am not from Vermont. I lived there for four years and that was enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TexanToTheCore

Wish I had a dollar everytime he used the word “I”.


27 posted on 09/05/2007 9:33:55 AM PDT by ohiobushman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson