Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: upchuck

Cindy Sheehan never served during the Viet Nam war, in fact she never served at all, ergo by her rules she has no right to question the service or non service of any else one at all.

Her son never questioned the reason for this war, in fact he volunteered to fight it.

She condemns her son’s stance on this war every time she opens her mouth.


8 posted on 09/05/2007 7:46:35 AM PDT by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: usmcobra

He was born in 1952 and never served in Vietnam? Why he should have been one of the first to go in 1964. I had a nut say the same to me, as I was born in 1957 and yet did not serve in Vietnam! Don’t give me any of this “I was 12 years old crap”.


9 posted on 09/05/2007 7:55:05 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: usmcobra

And this is the heart of her problem...she cannot get over the fact that her son made an informed decision to join the Army and the War on Terrorism against her wishes and, having given his life to that pursuit, she now views him as a victim of “George Bush’s War”...it’s the only frame of reference she will allow herself to believe. She needs a good shrink.


14 posted on 09/05/2007 8:13:48 AM PDT by vigilence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson