Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

D.C. Madam: Clients' Secrets Might Have National Security Implications
FOXNews.com ^ | Wednesday, September 05, 2007 | Staff

Posted on 09/05/2007 10:17:49 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative

WASHINGTON — A woman accused of running a high-end Washington prostitution ring says the U.S. government may be targeting her because Muslim men used her escort service before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

In court papers filed this week, Deborah Jeane Palfrey said she might have to divulge classified information to defend herself against racketeering charges. She said the information — possibly including the identities of customers from the Middle East — could have national security implications.


Deborah Jeane Palfrey

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: dcmadam
Fox News requires only excerpts. You'll have to click on the link to read the whole story.

There's also a story in the Washington comPost.

1 posted on 09/05/2007 10:17:51 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

This dame really has a vivid imagination if she thinks she can manipulate the system like this.


2 posted on 09/05/2007 10:21:21 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
I don’t believe she has anything, if there was anything it would of been wall-to-wall coverage already by the Main Stream Media courtesy of Larry “Chicken Lover” Flynt.


3 posted on 09/05/2007 10:22:35 AM PDT by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
she might have to divulge classified information

Classified, or just damning? Somehow, I don't think the local DC Madame ever submitted an SF86 for a security clearance.

4 posted on 09/05/2007 10:23:06 AM PDT by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Security risks? Precisely the reason we don’t want our lawmakers sleeping with prostitutes.... Could it BE any more obvious!


5 posted on 09/05/2007 10:23:11 AM PDT by colorcountry (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. --Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I hope she offers up proof that some of the hypocrite terrorists used the escort service.


6 posted on 09/05/2007 10:23:13 AM PDT by RDTF (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but Democrats believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

...which is why I can only show you the Republican entries...


7 posted on 09/05/2007 10:24:36 AM PDT by 50sDad (Angels on asteroids are abducting crop circles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
GUILTY!!!

Ooops... Wrong thread. :O)

8 posted on 09/05/2007 10:25:37 AM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

“Chicken Lover” Flynt
Probably still negotiating.


9 posted on 09/05/2007 10:29:02 AM PDT by dynachrome (Henry Bowman is right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry
"Security risks? Precisely the reason we don’t want our lawmakers sleeping with prostitutes.... "

Yeah!, There are some things even prostitutes shouldn't be subjected too, sleeping with politico's.....

BTW, how exactly do you tell the difference between a politician and a prostitute?

A: There are some things that prostitutes won't do for money....

10 posted on 09/05/2007 10:35:25 AM PDT by nevergore ("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nevergore

LOL!


11 posted on 09/05/2007 10:37:35 AM PDT by Califreak (Go Hunter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Additional info:
http://www.yardbird.com/reader_sen_vitter_breached_committee_duties.htm


12 posted on 09/05/2007 10:47:39 AM PDT by enots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sax

might be, it wouldn’t be the first time in history people tried to make themselves appear important and divulged state secrets between the sheets.


13 posted on 09/05/2007 10:49:15 AM PDT by absolootezer0 (stop repeat offenders- don't re-elect them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nevergore

B: A prostitute is honest about what she does.


14 posted on 09/05/2007 10:51:04 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
In court papers filed this week, Deborah Jeane Palfrey said she might have to divulge classified information to defend herself against racketeering charges.

So, she disclosed Sen. Vitter, but she's protecting Islamic terrorists?

-PJ

15 posted on 09/05/2007 10:52:31 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sax
Classified, or just damning?

It's not classified until someone with the authority to classify it says it is. OTOH, she could mean she has information that would be deemed classified were it to be reviewed.

16 posted on 09/05/2007 10:53:15 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
This dame really has a vivid imagination if she thinks she can manipulate the system like this.

Don't be so sure.

17 posted on 09/05/2007 10:53:19 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
D.C. Madam: Clients' Secrets Might Have National Security Implications

DUH.

18 posted on 09/05/2007 10:53:40 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Its pretty obvious that she was allowed to operate in DC for many years, and that’s likely because her service was used in conjunction with blackmailing people, foreign nationals included. So I don’t doubt there are some “national security” issues at play here.


19 posted on 09/05/2007 10:53:41 AM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

lol!


20 posted on 09/05/2007 10:56:26 AM PDT by nevergore ("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Wow. The DC madam used Muslims and Senator Vetter on her docet. Great role models for all to see. Idiots.


21 posted on 09/05/2007 10:57:44 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
She was just a madam who got caught, happened before. She isn’t as dam special as she thinks she is.

If she keeps this up she should change her last name to Lohan.

22 posted on 09/05/2007 10:58:14 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enots

Are we to believe the “sainted” demoflops have not used the madame’s services???????????? HeHe. Yes we are. I know a demoflop who used his interns to “chaperone” important visitors around DC. He was too cheap to use the madam’s service, I guess.


23 posted on 09/05/2007 11:13:03 AM PDT by tillacum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Yup, yup, yup.............if politicians don’t want information out, just claim it is a matter of Nation Security.


24 posted on 09/05/2007 11:20:46 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2

yeah, they always hide behind that one.


25 posted on 09/05/2007 7:51:39 PM PDT by bobby.223 (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson