Skip to comments.
Cruising While Republican (What - Lil Ol' Us Conservatives? Ann Coulter Alert)
Ann Coulter.com ^
| 09/05/2007
| Ann Coulter
Posted on 09/05/2007 3:06:21 PM PDT by goldstategop
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: Stepan12
Yes, virtue is much more difficult in youth when libido is highly charged. Someone pointed that out about Malcolm Muggeridge after his conversion from rake to devout Christian. On a slightly humorous note about promiscuity, Oscar Wilde said he could “resist everything but temptation.” And, had he met Larry Craig in that mens room they’d have probably gotten temporarily married.
41
posted on
09/05/2007 7:04:25 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Democrats have plenty of patience for anti-American dictators but none for Iraqi democrats.)
To: goldstategop
And now, Larry Craig is considering a take-back on his offer to resign, thinking that he may be able to grease the wheels and get the charge dismissed back in Minnesota, which would nullify the “guilty” plea.
Well, at least since he now has Arlen Specter on his side as his “cloakroom lawyer”. Sen. Specter is hardly the ‘go-to’ guy that conservative Republicans should be talking to on resolving problems, though.
Larry Craig’s best course, if he is going to tough it out, is to renounce his membership in the Republican party, and do a “Jim Jeffords” straddle. Not quite a Democratican, but certainly no longer a Republican.
Then he could accept Sen. Specter’s assistance in good faith.
Sen’ Specter does NOT have the best interests of the Republican party in mind. Otherwise, he would have jumped in to help out Rick Santorum.
42
posted on
09/05/2007 7:12:31 PM PDT
by
alloysteel
(Never attribute to ignorance that which is adequately explained by stupidity.)
To: goldstategop
Indignant that Craig had short-circuited their gleeful gay-baiting, liberals quickly switched to a new set of talking points. In the blink of an eye, they went from calling Craig a "deviant" to attacking Republicans for not insisting that Craig stay. I called that one in mid-switch. The local librul rag (Lewiston, Idaho) featured a headline - a front-page HEADLINE, mind you - yesterday that read "ANALYSIS: GOP HAS NO STOMACH FOR SCANDAL". What we actually have here is hypocrisy all right - world-class, aching, vomit-inducing hypocrisy and a perfect willingness to slap any gay person on their own side down who strays from the plantation.
It comes as no particular surprise that the editorial board of the NY Times - the "Gay Mafia" in their very own terminology - has figured a way around all of this that only involves a complete sellout of whatever slender principles they might have had left. My guess is that after their usual fashion, the price was cheap.
What irks me the most in the affair is not that Craig was trolling for BJ's in a public crapper, but that he and the commentariat are just fine with the laws that got him as long as they don't have to obey them and the rest of us do. Did we hear a cry from the left that this was the entrapment of an innocent (gay) man under an unjust law? That's why we didn't.
What is most clarified by this affair is that one side has standards and the other perquisites. That divide has never been sharper or more disgraceful.
To: I_like_good_things_too
Well, that could be interesting...not that there is anything wrong with that.
44
posted on
09/05/2007 7:25:09 PM PDT
by
gathersnomoss
(If General Patton was alive, he would slap many faces!!)
To: Stepan12
45
posted on
09/05/2007 8:48:33 PM PDT
by
bethtopaz
(A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you hav)
To: Max Friedman
(my daughter looks like she could be Annes younger sister).Quick feed her a samich right now. And make it a big un.
46
posted on
09/05/2007 8:50:27 PM PDT
by
mountn man
(The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
To: alloysteel
Sen Specter does NOT have the best interests of the Republican party in mind. Otherwise, he would have jumped in to help out Rick Santorum. Didn't Specter campaign for Santorum? I know Santorum backed Specter in '04.
47
posted on
09/05/2007 8:56:06 PM PDT
by
Cyropaedia
("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
To: VR-21
Shes the political and intellectual equivalent of a mongoose. No wonder leftists snakes hate her.
48
posted on
09/05/2007 9:02:02 PM PDT
by
mountn man
(The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
To: mountn man
Exactly!
49
posted on
09/05/2007 9:16:06 PM PDT
by
VR-21
To: goldstategop
Indignant that Craig had short-circuited their gleeful gay-baiting, liberals quickly switched to a new set of talking points. In the blink of an eye, they went from calling Craig a "deviant" to attacking Republicans for not insisting that Craig stay. That's OK Ann, the libs got RINO Arlen Specter to say a few words of encouragement, and now Craig is talking of withdrawing the guilty verdict and being an Indian Giver with his pledge to resign.
Let the Field Day resume.
50
posted on
09/05/2007 9:55:23 PM PDT
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: bethtopaz
Who is Pamela Geller? She looks like she does, and she shoots. What more do you need to know? Shooting says a lot about her character, and her looks speak for themselves.
51
posted on
09/05/2007 10:01:35 PM PDT
by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: goldstategop
And there went MSNBC's fall program schedule. No loss there...
52
posted on
09/05/2007 10:06:03 PM PDT
by
Tall_Texan
(Global warming? Hell, in Texas, we just call that "summer".)
To: uncbob
53
posted on
09/06/2007 1:33:22 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(Fred Thompson '0?)
To: goldstategop
Solid column up until the end:
If the charges against Craig are true -- and that is certainly in doubt....
Sorry, Ann - - the circumstantial evidence is mountainous. There is no doubt.
To: El Gato
To: uncbob
I remember when the Bush Bods were all over Ann because of the Harriet Miers fiascoIt was like playing a game of Old Maid.
To: goldstategop
"I thought gays just wanted to get married to one another and settle down in the suburbs so they could visit each other in the hospital."Ha! That line is perfect because it's what homosexual activists like to tell the masses in order to get them to support gay marriage.
57
posted on
09/06/2007 3:50:08 AM PDT
by
Pinkbell
(Duncan Hunter 2008 - Protecting and Restoring America)
To: goldstategop
I have not finished reading the article but I think I found the best quote of the piece -
If liberals were any happier, they'd be gay.
58
posted on
09/06/2007 4:10:43 AM PDT
by
7thson
(I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
To: Stepan12
Pam and Ann, Arm Wrestling over me.
59
posted on
09/06/2007 6:02:50 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: 7thson
Is the Times saying that sex in public rest rooms is the essence of being Gay.
Why that was the exact ruling by a MA judge who stopped the State Police from breaking up circle jerks in Rest Stops on MA highways. He ruled that public sex is a staple of “Gay Culture”.
60
posted on
09/06/2007 6:06:02 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson