Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/05/2007 8:22:31 PM PDT by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: rface; All

After listening to Ru Paul in this debate, he should be censored and censured. What a moron.


48 posted on 09/05/2007 9:46:43 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Division Soldier fighting terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface

Wow. People REALLY don’t like him. He will go away soon enough. He is the best at “trying” to follow the Constitution . I was shocked though when I saw he is a porker too (and says it’s OK cause it’s for his district...) NEVER had a chance, but has been one of the more interesting candidates. All the others are flip-floppers except for Thompson, RudyG and uncan DHunter. Of those, I would have wished Hunter got more play. He’s been ignored from what I can see (in the non-internet world).


49 posted on 09/05/2007 9:48:44 PM PDT by PghBaldy (Bill O'Loofah is trying too hard to be moderate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
Who the hell are all these Ron Paul supporters?

Ron Paul is a delusional megalomaniac. Anyone who supports him after that embarrassing performance at tonights debate is delusional as well.

I was more or less ambivalent to Ron Paul before tonight's debate, but at this point, I think he needs to be removed from the Republican party. I do not think that any of the other candidates should be forced to share a stage with this maniac. He demeaned everyone at that debate by his mere presence.

50 posted on 09/05/2007 9:53:40 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface

There's a great future in tin foil, Benjamin. Think about it.

51 posted on 09/05/2007 10:05:14 PM PDT by LexBaird (Behold, thou hast drinken of the Aide of Kool, and are lost unto Men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
The biggest "culprit" according to the web site was Fox News -- mentioning the Top 3 candidates almost five times as frequent as all the other candidates combined.

Finally some proof of what I've been saying here before. Fox News is obsessed with Romney, Giuliani, McCain and (soon) Thompson. It's like the RNC faxed them and told them to only talk about those republican candidates only.

54 posted on 09/05/2007 10:39:19 PM PDT by NapkinUser (Tom Tancredo or Ron Paul in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface

anybody who thinks C-BS News, USA Today and NY Times are the most fair has already ended their credibility for anything else.


56 posted on 09/05/2007 10:59:13 PM PDT by GeronL (Fred Thompson '0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface

Ron Paul sounds like the name of a gay hairdresser


60 posted on 09/06/2007 12:11:26 AM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface

Don’t worry...the far-left crazies over at HuffingtonPost loved Congressman Ron Paul: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-neffinger-glynnis-macnicol-and-rachel-sklar/liveblog-foxnews-gop-deb_b_63235.html


61 posted on 09/06/2007 1:20:55 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Our next president: Fred Thompson!! http://www.ImWithFred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
[FOX News just declaired Ron Paul the winner in tonights debate....but Ron Paul's win has been discredited by Hannity]

Wrong. They REPORTED that Ron Paul got more cell phone votes than the other candidates.

No SANE person anywhere on the planet thinks Ron Paul won that debate.
65 posted on 09/06/2007 6:18:10 AM PDT by elizabetty (Ron Paul - Because Moonbats Need Choices Too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface; DreamsofPolycarp; The_Eaglet; Irontank; Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; gnarledmaw; ...

Ron Paul campaign website

Ron's weekly message [5 minutes audio, every Monday]
PodcastWeekly archive • Toll-free 888-322-1414 •
Free Republic Ron Paul Ping List: Join/Leave


Post-debate ping
69 posted on 09/06/2007 6:32:35 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface

Having read some of what Fox News is writing about Romney, I think Romney would be happy to give up some of that attention to Ron Paul.

In other news, Ron Cox isn’t mentioned as often as Ron Paul. And this report didn’t even notice he was a candidate, so I think the report is biased.

On a more serious note, in their information, they show Romney at 13,000 to Ron Paul’s 248, and say that’s the worst case of bias.

But look at the New York Times numbers:
Ron paul is mentioned 21,700 times, McCain only 15,500 times, and Hunter only 535 times. And Romney? It must be a typo, their chart says Romney only had 87 mentions.

The more liberal the news source, the more often Ron Paul is mentioned compared to the other candidates.

Lastly, they had the strange notion that all the bottom-tier candidates should, in aggregate, be mentioned as often as all the top-tiered candidates.

That is stupid, if they were mentioned as much, they wouldn’t be bottom-tiered candidates.

It speaks to the bias of the New York Times that they talked more about the candidates who have no chance of winning than they did about our serious candidates who could win.

Of course, what I’d really like to see is a comparison for each of these sources between mentions of ANY republican candidate vs ANY democratic candidate. Want to bet the LA times has mentioned democrat presidential candidates a LOT more than the 1700 or so times they mentioned republicans?

Think about that. the LA times TOTAL mention of republican candidates has been about 2000, while USA today has mentioned them about 7 times as much, or 14,000 times.


75 posted on 09/06/2007 7:00:10 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface

Geez, if it wasn’t for all of these Ron Paul threads what would all of you haters have to do? Apparently, Ron Paul only has 1% following, but here at freerepublic, he has a following of 90% who have nothing better to do but look for Ron Paul threads to bash him and his supporters on. That’s a good sign if you believe in every action as an equal opposite reaction.


90 posted on 09/06/2007 7:53:19 AM PDT by Nephi ( $100m ante is a symptom of the old media... the Ron Paul Revolution is the new media's choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
...6,570 references to Rudy Giuliani...

Seems kind of low. They must have forgotten to add in the references made by Hannity.

93 posted on 09/06/2007 8:03:12 AM PDT by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface

I have noticed the talk show hosts on ABC channels ignoring them and/or making fun of them....including Duncan Hunter, Tancredo, Paul, Huckabee. We are going to have the “pretty boys” forced down our throats by the liberal and our own conservative media because they are undermining the other guys.


102 posted on 09/06/2007 8:58:50 AM PDT by applpie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUxQadgSkoA

I voted in this one. I didnt even vote in the one where he lost to Romney right at the end.


105 posted on 09/06/2007 9:22:02 AM PDT by JJTHEBULL (You're either with US, or you're with the ILLEGALS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson