Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There IS a God : World's Foremost Former Atheist, Antony Flew Writes a Book Explaining His Reasons. ^

Posted on 09/07/2007 12:53:40 PM PDT by SirLinksalot

For your perusal : Former foremost atheist, Philosopher, Antony Flew's latest book -- "There IS a God : How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind".

Antony Flew was one of the world's most prominent atheist who wrote many books trying to debunk the notion of the existence of God.

He has debated many Christian thinkers like Gary Habermas and William Lane Craig on the issue in the past and was considered a champion of atheism.

Among his most famous books promoting atheism are :

* Hume's Philosophy of Belief (1961)

* Logic And Language (1961) editor

* God and Philosophy (1966)

* Logic & Language (Second Series) (1966) editor * Evolutionary Ethics (1967)

* Darwinian Evolution (1984)

* God, Freedom and Immortality: A Critical Analysis. (1984)

* The Presumption of Atheism (1984)

* God: A Critical Inquiry (1986)

* Does God Exist?: A Believer and an Atheist Debate (1991) with Terry L. Miethe

* Does God Exist: The Craig-Flew Debate (2003) with William Lane Craig

However, after re-thinking the issue for a long time, Flew announced that he has come to believe in God, three years ago (2004).

Antony Flew, has now authored a book with HarperCollins (There Is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind, October 23, 2007), his co-author being Roy Varghese, author of the Intelligent Design friendly book : WONDER OF THE WORLD: A JOURNEY FROM MODERN SCIENCE INTO THE MIND OF GOD

Charles H. Townes - Nobel Prize winner and inventor of the laser, has actually endoresed Varghese's book as : "...a sensitive, profound and clear discussion of the important issues of our universe and our existence."

This is how the Publisher describes Flew's latest book :


For the first time, this book will present a detailed and fascinating account of Flew's riveting decision to revoke his previous beliefs and argue for the existence of God. Ever since Flew's announcement, there has been great debate among atheists and believers alike about what exactly this "conversion" means. There Is a God will finally put this debate to rest.

This is a story of a brilliant mind and reasoned thinker, and where his lifelong intellectual pursuit eventually led him: belief in God as designer.


This book is sure to be a facinating read for the open-minded.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: antonyflew; atheism; atheist; bookreview; god
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: SirLinksalot

read later

21 posted on 09/07/2007 1:28:52 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
He couldn’t provide a naturalistic explanation for the first reproducing organism.

And your point is what?

For several thousand years astronomers lacked a naturalistic description of gravity. Was gravity during that period a manefestation of unspecified pushers and shovers?

22 posted on 09/07/2007 1:29:07 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

He also did a great job of exposes the procedural disingenuousness in Rawls’ Theory of Justice.

23 posted on 09/07/2007 1:31:39 PM PDT by Cosmo (Liberalism is for girls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
You know ... they have Dial-A-Prayer for athiests now ...

You call it and no one answers.
24 posted on 09/07/2007 1:37:43 PM PDT by One_who_hopes_to_know
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
"From Wikipedia: (In an article) Flew states that he has left his long-standing espousal of atheism by endorsing a deism ... "While reason, mainly in the form of arguments to design, assures us that there is a God, there is no room either for any supernatural revelation of that God or for any transactions between that God and individual human beings."

Deism is such weak sauce; totally unaccountable for free will. Further, Jefferson postulated deism as one part of his (somewhat unfortunately) ever-shifting view of God he espoused during his lifetime -- however, his postulation, per se, is entirely apropos of the Enlightenment period.

25 posted on 09/07/2007 1:38:55 PM PDT by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BlabItGrabIt
And He has very few people He can call His trusted friends...

I suspect that is much less true today than it was five years ago.

26 posted on 09/07/2007 1:39:02 PM PDT by Tribune7 (Michael Moore bought Haliburton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan
“You believe that there is one God: you do well. The devils also believe, and tremble.” James 2:19

A profoundly educational verse for the masses of the world.

MM (in TX)

27 posted on 09/07/2007 1:41:20 PM PDT by MississippiMan (Behold now behemoth...he moves his tail like a cedar. Job 40:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Well, it is his free will to deny his own free will.

28 posted on 09/07/2007 1:42:38 PM PDT by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Spok

Is that like riding the roller coaster again while your pants are still wet?

29 posted on 09/07/2007 1:54:05 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: I still care
Well I was down in Chinatown
Eatin' some Minh's Chow Fon
I happened to turn around
And when I look I see my Chow Fon's gone.

I got the paranoia blues
From knockin' round New York City
Where they'll roll you for a nickel
And stick you for the extra dime.

Any way you choose,
You're bound to lose in New York City.
Oh I just got out in a nick of time
yeah, I just got out in a nick of time.

Paul Simon, "Paranoia Blues"

30 posted on 09/07/2007 1:57:53 PM PDT by Erasmus (My simplifying explanation had the disconcerting side effect of making the subject incomprehensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Read Flew's Hume's Philosophy of Belief back in the early '70s in graduate school. Useful book, obviously bright guy. This new book might be interesting.
31 posted on 09/07/2007 2:00:50 PM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I think he is a deist of some sort though.

32 posted on 09/07/2007 2:06:48 PM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Be interestiing to know what his former fans think of him now. Considering his age (81) they probably think his change of views are the result of senility.

33 posted on 09/07/2007 2:08:45 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher
I read a book about 10 or so years ago called "God the Evidence: Reconciliation of Faith and Reason in a Postsecular World" by a Patrick Glynn.

From the editorial review on Amazon:

Like Mr. Buckley, Patrick Glynn is a Christian who has written a book about his faith. But his is a very different journey-from faith to agnosticism and finally back to faith again. As he puts it: "This book had its origins in a spiritual reawakening-or to put the situation somewhat less philosophical atheist or agnostic, I finally realized that there was in fact a God."

Mr. Glynn, the product of a secular Harvard education roughly 25 years after Mr. Buckley was at Yale, is a former arms-controller and now a professor at George Washington University. In "God: The Evidence" he sets out in layman's language the scientific evidence for the existence of God. This is a monumental and ultimately impossible task-no one can reason his way to faith-but Mr. Glynn's review of the scientific literature is compelling.

His thesis is that the scientific discoveries of the past 25 years, especially in the physical sciences, have refuted the idea of a "random universe"-the modern idea that human life was a chance event-in favor of the "anthromorphic principle": the idea that there is an intelligent guiding hand at work. The phrase "anthromorphic principle" was coined by Brandon Carter, a Cambridge University physicist and cosmologist, at a seminal 1973 lecture in Krakow, Poland, where the world's greatest scientific thinkers had gathered to celebrate the 500th anniversary of the birth of Copernicus. He argued that the long list of mysterious coincidences inexplicable to students of the origins of the universe share one common denominator: All were necessary for the creation of human life, thus implying a creation by design.

Carter was by no means alone in these God-friendly views. His lecture was inspired by ideas that were just then beginning to percolate in scientific circles and that took off afterward. Mr. Glynn summarizes a host of these ideas, among them those of astronomer Fred Hoyle, progenitor of the "big bang," who once said: "An explosion in a junkyard does not lead to sundry bits of metal being assembled into a useful working machine."

Mr. Glynn devotes a chapter to the science of psychology, reviewing studies that show a correlation between religious belief and mental health-in contrast to Freud's view of religion as a childish illusion in need of correction. Elsewhere, he looks at the growing body of literature on near-death experience, which he believes offer evidence of an afterlife.

Underlying Mr. Glynn's analyses is one crucial point, which is that Western intellectual life is undergoing a huge shift: It is finding room for God. Until very recently the history of modern scientific thought-Galileo, Darwin, Freud-pointed away from religion toward a secular world view. Now, the "God hypothesis" is gaining ground; and for the first time since the heretic Galileo appeared before the Inquisition, science and faith aren't on a collision course.

End review. I found the book fascinating, although some of the physics parts were beyond what little knowledge I have in that subject.

34 posted on 09/07/2007 2:16:08 PM PDT by 3catsanadog (Vote for the person at the primaries; vote for the party at the election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

So basically, this guy thinks that every musing that crosses his mind needs to be shared with the world, eh? Doesn’t sound like he’s changed in essentials, simply going from “You should listen to why I don’t believe” to “You should listen to why I do.”

35 posted on 09/07/2007 2:17:39 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

The dollar turned from both sides.

36 posted on 09/07/2007 2:27:41 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot


37 posted on 09/07/2007 2:41:42 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I had a room mate back in the early 90’s who was a devout atheist. There was never any chance of me changing his mind.

When I found out he was selling several pounds of pot each month I immediately moved out. One month later the house was stormed early in the morning during a countywide raid 2 days before Christmas.

He spent it in jail and had an epiphany of some sorts and seeds others had planted took root and he became a professing born again Christian and is still to this day.

As for this author, I hope he’s had his original books pulled from all shelves.

38 posted on 09/07/2007 2:52:52 PM PDT by diverteach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

similar thing happened to this gentleman...

39 posted on 09/07/2007 4:00:15 PM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

I wonder if Inspector Dreyfus' clone Hitchens will be the next to come to his senses?

40 posted on 09/07/2007 4:17:28 PM PDT by dragonblustar (Freedom of Speech is for everyone, not just liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson