Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NAFTA Superhighway plans advance south
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | September 10, 2007 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 09/10/2007 3:41:24 AM PDT by Man50D

Official Mexican government reports reveal Mexico has entered discussions with the state of Texas and top officials in the Bush administration to extend the Trans-Texas Corridor into Mexico, with a plan to connect through Monterrey to the deep-water Mexican ports on the Pacific, including Manzanillo and Lazaro Cardenas.

The official website of the Mexican northeastern state of Nuevo León contain multiple reports that José Natividad Gonzáles Parás, governor of the Mexican state of Nuevo León, has actively discussed with numerous U.S. government officials, including Texas Gov. Rick Perry, Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, the extension of the Trans-Texas Corridor into Mexico to create what's called a "Trans North America Corridor."

Gov. Gonzales Paras and U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters at Transportes Olympic in February 2007.

In an August trip to Mexico, Perry made news in U.S. media by calling the idea of building a fence along the U.S.-Mexico border "idiocy."

Largely unreported in the American press were meetings Perry held in Mexico with Gonzáles Parás in which the two discussed extending the corridor into Mexico.

In their private meetings, the pair thoroughly discussed extending TTC-35 into Mexico, according to a report on the government's site.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushadministration; canada; condoleezzarice; corsi; cuespookymusic; jeromecorsi; josegonzalesparas; laredo; lazarocardenas; manzanillo; marypeters; mexico; monterrey; naftasuperhighway; northamerica; nuevoleon; rickperry; texas; tinfoil; tnac; transtexascorridor; ttc; ttc35; tx; unitedstates; us; usa; wnd; worldnetdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-55 next last

1 posted on 09/10/2007 3:41:24 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D

... and this extention of the corridor into Mexico will be financed how? Will the USA be required to pay for this?


2 posted on 09/10/2007 3:44:08 AM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

That’s so more poisoned/dangerous Chinese products can come through the Mexican ports to a store near you, accompanied by drug cartel imports and illegal aliens, of course. Thank you, US government.


3 posted on 09/10/2007 3:44:27 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
"There are no plans to build a super highway."

That is because they use the words, "super corridor."

4 posted on 09/10/2007 3:46:38 AM PDT by Nephi ( $100m ante is a symptom of the old media... the Ron Paul Revolution is the new media's choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522; Czar; Borax Queen; WorkerbeeCitizen; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; yorkie; processing please hold
Will the USA be required to pay for this?

According to Dobbs report on information from Judicial Watch, obtained only through FOIA, it appears so...

VIDEO (3:12 min.): Lou Dobbs | North American Union by 2010

SPP Summit Scheduled in Canada, Summer 2007
U.S. Taxpayers May End up Footing the Bill

Through the Freedom of Information Act, Judicial Watch recently obtained a 10-page document, "a financial work plan that describes how U.S. taxpayers would fund grants to Mexico. The work plan states:

'...the establishment of a grant fund for development with U.S. and Canadian resources to finance the development of physical infrastructure in Mexico.'

Canadian funds would also be committed to the project. Judicial Watch is calling for complete disclosure...."


5 posted on 09/10/2007 3:48:24 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Don’t matter what we want, even if we are the VAST majority.
Big business wants this and it will happen.
Screw you.


6 posted on 09/10/2007 3:48:39 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Thanx for the ping nic.


7 posted on 09/10/2007 3:58:40 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (An American Patriot and an anti-Islam kind of fellow. (POI))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

ahh yes - the gutting of America continues.


8 posted on 09/10/2007 4:00:25 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (An American Patriot and an anti-Islam kind of fellow. (POI))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
In an August trip to Mexico, Perry made news in U.S. media by calling the idea of building a fence along the U.S.-Mexico border "idiocy.".
What is it with Texas politicians - why do they all kowtow to the Mexican government ?
9 posted on 09/10/2007 4:24:35 AM PDT by stratboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stratboy
What is it with Texas politicians - why do they all kowtow to the Mexican government ?

It's known as socialism and the new world order.
10 posted on 09/10/2007 4:26:30 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
the extension of the Trans-Texas Corridor into Mexico to create what's called a "Trans North America Corridor."

Nope. Not real. There are at least 3-4 posters right here on FR that will tell you so. Pipe dream, they say. With references to tinfoil. Just ask them.

11 posted on 09/10/2007 4:35:37 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
There isn't just one NAFTA corridor planned; there are several:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

===

from

Shape North America's Future


The only North American model parliament




Link to maps of The north americain trade corridors

===
12 posted on 09/10/2007 5:14:27 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

I’ve got photos of Typhoon Class subs, I’ve got photos of Taliban funerals, but I’ve yet to see a photo of a purported 400 yard wide super highway cutting through the south west. This is Black Helicopter material.


13 posted on 09/10/2007 6:22:14 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
Black Helicopter material.

Go back to sleep.

By the time you do see it, it will be too late.

No need to worry your pretty little head about it now.

If all the hundreds of thousands of google links can't inform you of reality, nothing can.
14 posted on 09/10/2007 6:58:16 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: stratboy
During the last legislative session, Gov Perry asked for and got over $120 million for border security, over what has already been spent. Texans will have to pay for this because the feds won't.

Only about 20% of Texans think that a fence will be effective.

If you think a fence is effective, build one around your state. You don't need to worry about how this might affect your onion exports, you still have an abundant supply of crackers to export.

15 posted on 09/10/2007 10:02:33 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

I guess opinion polls should guide whether or not we build a fence. While were at it, lets put out the welcome mat.

PS: I’ve been to Texas quite a few times (Houston, Dallas/FW). You might look closer to home before throwing the word “cracker” around. Your state has more than its share of rednecks.


16 posted on 09/10/2007 12:21:23 PM PDT by stratboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WorkerbeeCitizen
ahh yes - the gutting of America continues.

That it does...it most certainly does.

17 posted on 09/10/2007 1:57:44 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
There isn't just one NAFTA corridor planned; there are several:

You are absolutely correct. There indeed are several planned; and included within those plans are rails, between them:

News coming on the NAFTA Rail road along the super-corridor

Second pic above is screen shot of first page and link to pdf file.

18 posted on 09/10/2007 2:18:14 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
CAPTIONS FOR PHOTOS in pdf document (according to the pdf document), previously provided:

Captions for photos:

1. The Port of Lazaro Cardenas on Mexico’s Pacific Coast is in the midst of a $290 million

expansion that will expand its capacity to more than 2 million TEUs per year.

2. The world’s three largest shipping companies already offer regularly scheduled service at Lazaro Cardenas.

3. In 1997, Kansas City Southern and TMM joined forces to create Transportacion Ferroviaria Mexicana (TFM), paving the way for what is now known as “The Nafta Railway.”

4. A single 1,300-mile railroad, under common management, seamlessly connects Mexican seaports to the central United States.

5. This is the sole railroad bridge connecting the United States with Mexico at Laredo, Texas.


19 posted on 09/10/2007 2:33:38 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

TANKS Nic...


20 posted on 09/10/2007 3:59:50 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

yw, CM


21 posted on 09/10/2007 5:22:42 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

22 posted on 09/10/2007 5:52:47 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
'...the establishment of a grant fund for development with U.S. and Canadian resources to finance the development of physical infrastructure in Mexico.'


23 posted on 09/12/2007 5:18:55 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Oh, Geesh, not THIS crap AGAIN?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; AprilfromTexas; B4Ranch; B-Chan; ..

Trans-Texas/Mexico/Whatever Corridor PING!


24 posted on 09/12/2007 5:20:17 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Oh, Geesh, not THIS crap AGAIN?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

yeah...that again.


25 posted on 09/12/2007 6:08:10 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Where can I find that super-corridor map you posted?


26 posted on 09/12/2007 6:08:36 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Oh, Geesh, not THIS crap AGAIN?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
This one?

I downloaded that pic quite some time ago, and believe I obtained it from the NAFTA website itself. I believe they've been removing such "blatantly obvious" pictures of the corridor since that time as they have been getting a lot of flack over this whole business with anyone who's pro-American and informed, or becoming informed. There's a smaller version of that pic at this website, with this article:

North American Union, Global Governance Welcome to the no man's land of the 'North Americanist'

"Plans that promote regional government development can be found in the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPPNA or SPP). In Canada, initiatives have also come under headings like Deep Integration, or the Big Idea. Regardless of the title, the outcome will be the same: regional priorities taking precedence over national sovereignty, economy, goals and culture."

Think about what's happening in the town where you live. Governments at every level and their impact on your everyday life becoming ever more insidious.

"Commissions, task forces and working groups--that bypass elected representatives and public interests--are "harmonizing" or "integrating" rational policies of countries (similar decision-making is also operating at local and state levels), " Niwa continues. "Eminent domain (power to seize private property without owner consent) is increasingly employed to remove barriers to (regional/global) free trade plans--like private property located on hundreds of thousands of acres of land on international corridor (NAFTA superhighway) routes that will run through many states; or private property located in cities/counties selected for international trade hub/port development (unbeknownst to the public at large)."


27 posted on 09/12/2007 7:37:18 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Here's another of it, one smaller and one the same size as I posted, in an October 2006 article found at a Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, news site, quoting WND....entitled:

Mexico Mega-Port Plan Key to 'NAFTA Superhighways'

28 posted on 09/12/2007 8:12:31 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Believe me, if hundreds of thousands of acres of private land were being confiscated for these supercorridors, the press would be all over it. They’re not THAT brain-dead. However, knowing that the idea itself actually does exist is very helpful.

I also noticed the Trans-Texas Corridor graphic inset.


29 posted on 09/12/2007 8:25:43 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Oh, Geesh, not THIS crap AGAIN?!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Yep; I believe this map is from the NAFTA/NASCO site originally....the design quality and features of it are similar to the other maps they have been putting out.


30 posted on 09/12/2007 8:28:05 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

It really has been interesting to watch the evolution of FR over the years. Some good, some bad.

But for the life of me the biggest surprise has been seeing so many Freepers become mouthpieces for the Teamsters.


31 posted on 09/12/2007 8:29:13 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
BTW, it is my opinion that the media is as complicit with the land grabs as they are with the illegal invasion. Simply because they do not report on land confiscations does not mean it is not occurring. I know it is, and I know that there are plans to continue to do so in the future. There are people screaming about this, but it's hard to be heard when 1) the Supreme Court is allowing the US government to Kelo at will (why do you think they rule in favor of government thievery of land; why do you think Bush did not file an Amicus Brief in the matter?); 2) the media refuses to report on it (they are behind this too; they aren't reporting on what the government is doing, save for lone voices in the wilderness, such as Dobbs).
32 posted on 09/12/2007 8:31:16 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

If a Hitler was the liberal’s enemy, then, for that moment in time, we’re on the same side.

Sorry you can’t see the forest from the trees.


33 posted on 09/12/2007 8:32:29 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

“The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” This is said to be an Arab proverb. How fitting.


34 posted on 09/12/2007 8:36:34 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

your brush paints a black and white picture.

i’ve been posting on this issue since at least 2003.

my view is different:

1. i’m not against new roads.

2. i’m against perry/zachry/cintra corruption.

3. i don’t like unions, period.


35 posted on 09/12/2007 8:37:04 PM PDT by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Oh, I see the forest alright.

I see the Teamsters in a blind panic that their utterly corrupt mob tactics that gave them monopoly control over U.S. Trucking are finally being threatened. It just breaks my little heart.

Its not quite as much fun as seeing Pablo Escobar riddled with bullets, but its close.

Organized crime deserves what it gets.


36 posted on 09/12/2007 9:19:30 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

I think you’re blinded by your hatred of unions that you cannot see that, in the scheme of things concerning the SPP/NAU, they are but frogs in the same hot water that you don’t yet feel.


37 posted on 09/12/2007 9:21:10 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo; ken21

More to the point... Why is anyone getting excited by something by Jerome Corsi of all people... In weird nut daily?


38 posted on 09/12/2007 9:24:25 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ramius; ken21

See, that’s where people like you out yourselves.

You always want to make it about the person who’s telling you what’s in the documents, rather than about the DOCUMENTS.

foflol! You’re so transparent.


39 posted on 09/12/2007 9:32:06 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Thanks for the video link of Lou Dobbs.Thank God for Lou Dobbs.


40 posted on 09/12/2007 9:41:13 PM PDT by Brandie (Duncan Hunter in 08')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brandie

Amen!


41 posted on 09/12/2007 9:44:10 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Whatever you say, Pablo.


42 posted on 09/12/2007 9:46:32 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

Whatsa matter, don’t have anything bad to say about your globalist, American-sellout buddies?


43 posted on 09/12/2007 9:47:34 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

OK... The Pablo comment was over the top. My apologies.

But on the larger question I simply fail to see the problem. So what if mexican or canadian trucks take their stuff all the way to market instead of being forced to offload to union trucks at the border?

US trucks can also get reciprocity into Canada and Mexico. So what? May the best truckers win.

I’m sure lots of people are just all broken up over any threat to the Teamsters deathgrip on the throats of business in the US. I guess I’m just not one of them.


44 posted on 09/12/2007 10:03:03 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
You fail to realize several things: they are exporting American jobs to Mexico. Not only is Bush & Co importing cheap illegal labor, claiming they are "just doing jobs Americans don't want to do," the good jobs are being shipped out, and it's not just in the trucking industry. The manufacturing industry, across the country, is going down the tubes. Now, when you have less people employed, such as at the ports that will be basically closing in Long Beach & LA because those jobs are ALSO being exported down to Mexico (that's why Mexican truckers will be bringing up the goods now), all the American businesses (including mom and pop stores) that DEPEND on American longshoreman...who will no longer be working, will be FOLDING. The towns that depend on these businesses will be tanking...

You see, it's NOT about Corsi. It's about greedy sellouts, greedy globalists and greedy elitists. The middle class America is being destroyed....good paying jobs are going away and taxes are going up, just so the corporate greedholders and globalists have their NAU and $$$$, that's "all" that matters.

45 posted on 09/12/2007 10:11:11 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
I'm no supporter of the Teamsters either. This issue, in Texas at least, is over the way that the state government is ramming the corridor down our throats. TxDOT and Perry are arrogant SOB's trying every trick in the book to have their TTC regardless of what we want. They won't listen to the voters.

The Teamsters are just reaping a benefit.

46 posted on 09/12/2007 11:01:05 PM PDT by Sarajevo ( I don't suffer from insanity; I enjoy every minute of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Ken522
... and this extension of the corridor into Mexico will be financed how? Will the USA be required to pay for this?

No doubt the US will get to pay for it, but Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim will collect the road tolls for us himself.

47 posted on 09/12/2007 11:05:33 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Return to ostrich mode...stick head back into sand


48 posted on 09/12/2007 11:24:48 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

“This is black helicopter material”.

The 400 yd. wide highway is in the works in Texas now. After extensive hearings throughout the affected region drew large heated protests, the State Legislature passed a law to delay any new state tollroads for two years so that they could study the matter further. This passed with a veto proof majority close to the end of the session. Gov. Rick “Goodhair” Perry (R-Mexico) waited until the Legislature adjourned for two years and then vetoed the Bill. (Gov. Goodhair was reelected last year with 39% of the vote in a 4 way race).
This is for real. Highways, railroad tracks, pipelines and utility ROW all in one massive ROW that will destroy small rural communties, scar the landscape, divide Couties (There is limited overpasses and acess) and no telling how much environmental damage.
Ironically, the same people who decry the Border Fence for it’s supposed environmental damage approve this monstrosity.
Welcome to the NAU!


49 posted on 09/12/2007 11:49:51 PM PDT by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

And what poll shows only 20% of Texans support a fence on the Border? This is Bogus. A more true poll would show the opposite.
Perry talked a good game before the election concerning Border issues but it was all a big gigantic lis. “Goodhair” will be doing good to match his 39% if he runs for reelection.


50 posted on 09/12/2007 11:56:55 PM PDT by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson