Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arabs Involved in 9/11 Were Cooperating with the Zionists [former Senator Abourezk]
Al-Manar TV /MEMRI ^ | 9-12-07

Posted on 09/12/2007 5:39:19 AM PDT by SJackson

Former U.S. Sen. James Abourezk on Hizbullah TV: The Arabs Involved in 9/11 Were Cooperating with the Zionists; People in America Don't Really Look at it That Deeply - They Accept What the Government and the Press Are Saying

The following are excerpts from an interview with former U.S. senator James Abourezk (D-SD), which aired on Al-Manar TV on August 30, 2007.

To view this clip, visit http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1551.htm.

"Yes, I Watch Al-Manar… in America"

Interviewer: "Mr. Abourezk, welcome to Al-Manar TV."

James Abourezk: "Thank you very much."

Interviewer: "It's good to have you."

James Abourezk: "Yes, I watch Al-Manar on one of the cable channels in America."

Interviewer: "Good, that's excellent. Especially [considering] the fact that Al-Manar TV was banned in the U.S. Does that really show something which is like shooting the freedom of expression?"

James Abourezk: "Well, freedom of expression is free for those whom the government likes. If they don't like them, freedom of expression goes out the window, apparently."

[...]

James Abourezk: "...You heard in the press."

Interviewer: "Now look what's happened in the case of Dr. Norman Finkelstein. It's something which is, you know..."

James Abourezk: "It's disastrous, disastrous. They've..."

Interviewer: "What happened to him?"

Alan Dershowitz - "A Real Snake"

James Abourezk: "He lost his tenure bid. So he therefore is going to have to go somewhere else, and find a job teaching."

Interviewer: "Why?"

James Abourezk: "Well, because they shot down his tenure. Even though his department was all for it, and the department heads were all for it, the president of that university shot it down."

Interviewer: "It's just because he was not an advocate of Israel?"

James Abourezk: "No, because the lobby put pressure on him - specifically, Alan Dershowitz. He's a real snake, I have to say that."

[...]

Interviewer: "You also called Hizbullah and Hamas 'resistance fighters.'"

James Abourezk: "They are."

Interviewer: "While the U.S. administration brands them as 'terrorist organizations'..."

James Abourezk: "That was done at the request of Israel. That name was done at the request of Israel - that the United States calls them terrorist organizations."

"The Original Terrorists [in the Middle East] Were Headed by [Menahem] Begin"

Interviewer: "On the other hand, you also declared that the original terrorist groups in the Middle East were the Jewish terrorist groups. What is this based on?"

James Abourezk: "It's based on fact. In fact, the original terrorists were headed by Begin, who was the head of the Irgun, and by Shamir, another prime minister, who was the head of... one of the three members of the Stern gang's leadership. I used to know Natan Yellin-Mor, by the way, one of the three leaders of the Stern gang, and he became a peacenik. He wanted peace in the Middle East, and he would..."

Interviewer: "Stern being one of the gangs of... Israeli gangs..."

James Abourezk: "One of the terrorist groups, vicious terrorist groups. Natan Yellin-Mor became... He was one of the heads of the Stern gang. They had a three-part head, and he was one of them. But he became a peacenik. He wanted peace between the Arabs and the Israelis, and so they boycotted him, the Israelis. When he would come to Washington, nobody would talk to him. So he used to come to me, and I would make appointments for him."

Interviewer: "But what made him change his mind?"

James Abourezk: "I don't really know. I think he saw the folly in what was going on. But you know... I mean... Look, anybody who knows anything about the history of Israel knows that Israel, by force of arms, stole all the territory in Palestine. There's no question about it. There's a new historian, Ilan Pappé, an Israeli historian, who's written an excellent book called The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. Yes, it's an excellent book, and it's history, and it's true history. But it tells how they had a plan to go in and kill and terrorize the Palestinians, to make them empty out Palestine, so they could take it over. That was a very vicious thing they did, and the more vicious thing is that now they call the Palestinians 'terrorists.'"

Interviewer: "Who are homeless in their own land..."

James Abourezk: "Absolutely, yes."

Interviewer: "Here I need to ask you something, which is growing and escalating in the Western world, and particularly in the U.S., which is this immense wave of anti-Arab, anti-Muslim sentiment, lumping all Arabs together as 'terrorists.' This was clearly manifested in movies and TV series, like 24. Why? Why now? Is it just after 9/11?"

"The Arabs Who Were Involved in 9/11 Cooperated With the Zionists"

James Abourezk: "No, it's after the Soviet Union collapsed. The Zionists were looking around for another enemy to have, because to them the Soviet Union was an enemy because they wouldn't allow Jewish emigration. So they used that as an organizing tool, basically, and when the Soviet Union collapsed, there was no more organizing about the Soviet Union. So they looked around, and they said: Well, the Muslims. Let's find the Arabs and the Muslims, and make them the boogeyman. And that's what they did."

Interviewer: "But why did this sentiment of hatred increase after 9/11?"

James Abourezk: "Well, because the Arabs who were involved in 9/11 cooperated with the Zionists, actually. It was a cooperation. They gave them the perfect excuse to denounce all Arabs. It's a racist sort of thing, really racist - you know, picking out these 19 or 20 terrorists - they were terrorists - and saying all the Arabs are like them. So, you know, people in America don't really look at it that deeply, and they accept what the government and the press are saying."[...]

"Israel... Wanted Syria Weakened Somehow, and to be Made an Enemy of the United States - So They Got Their People in Congress to Pass the [Syria Accountability] Act"

Interviewer: "Since we are here now in Damascus, the capital of Syria - how did you face this Syria Accountability Act, which most think is unfair? But as a former senator - where does the injustice here, particularly in this act, lie?"

James Abourezk: "Well, the injustice is that because Israel... I'm telling you, Israel is behind this move, because they wanted Syria weakened somehow, and to be made an enemy of the United States, so they got their people in Congress to pass the act. You see, the members of Congress are afraid to vote against anything the lobby wants. So, this is something the lobby wants..."

Interviewer: "So who is controlling who?"

James Abourezk: "The lobby is controlling the Congress."

Interviewer: "But you said that the U.S. is not in need of Israel, but rather, Israel needs the U.S."

James Abourezk: "Yes, that's right. But how they..."

Interviewer: "It's very paradoxical."

James Abourezk: "Well, how they fulfill that need is by pressuring Congress to support Israel. The chief objective of the Israeli lobby is to keep the American taxpayers' money flowing to Israel. That's the chief objective. They stop anybody who criticizes Israel, so that may stop the money from flowing. That's why they attack people who attack Israel."[...]

"I... Marveled at the Hizbullah Resistance to Israel... It Was a Marvel of Organization, of Courage and Bravery"

Interviewer: "Sir, in 2001, you came all the way from the U.S. to Lebanon to congratulate Lebanon, the Lebanese, and the resistance for the Israeli withdrawal from Southern Lebanon. Now what do you say during this time, which is in remembrance a year of the Israeli aggression against Lebanon and the earthshaking victory of the resistance, supported by the people of Lebanon. What do you say to them?"

James Abourezk: "That was quite an extraordinary thing, I thought. I actually marveled at the Hizbullah resistance to Israel, how they did it. It was a marvel of organization, of courage and bravery. I thought it was quite something."

Interviewer: "Do you think it's only the courage and organization that made them do this?"

James Abourezk: "Yes, absolutely. They were highly organized, the resistance, and they were very brave. They didn't turn and run, like some Arabs armies have done. They were defeated because of that. But this is something new for the Arab world. I said at the time: The Lebanese army should ask Hizbullah to come and organize it, to train them, you know. And all the Arab armies should have the Hizbullah come and do that."



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911conspiracy; sixthanniversary

1 posted on 09/12/2007 5:39:21 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson

You can trust a muslim...

...to be a lying muslim.


2 posted on 09/12/2007 5:43:02 AM PDT by Migraine (...diversity is great... until it happens to YOU...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I had (fortunately) forgotten the name of the former senator. What state did he represent?


3 posted on 09/12/2007 5:43:15 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

4 posted on 09/12/2007 5:43:38 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

5 posted on 09/12/2007 5:43:41 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Proudly keeping one iron boot on the necks of libertarian faux 'conservatives' since 1958!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The anti-Semitic ravings of Tommy Daschle’s mentor.


6 posted on 09/12/2007 5:44:38 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

judging from this guy and Daschle, South Dakota has some weird voters.


7 posted on 09/12/2007 5:45:31 AM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

South Dakota. Tommy Daschle was his anointed successor.


8 posted on 09/12/2007 5:46:03 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

Democrat from South Dakota.


9 posted on 09/12/2007 5:47:06 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The man is a lying moron. Nice to have a former Democratic Senator feeding crap to the anti-Semites of the World.


10 posted on 09/12/2007 5:47:32 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Senator Johnson needs to be asked if he agrees with this elder statesman of his homestate party.


11 posted on 09/12/2007 5:47:43 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (To libs killing a windfarm is bad, letting a gal die in your Oldsmobile is not so bad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg
South Dakota has about half as many voters as the Bronx.

In a community that tiny, weird things will happen.

12 posted on 09/12/2007 5:48:29 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

Dem from South Dakota, long gone.


13 posted on 09/12/2007 5:49:15 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes
Senator James Abourezk, Democrat from South Dakota

http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=A000017

When this nutcase was in the Senate during the 1970s, he couldn't get along with anyone, even members of his own party. He and Scoop Jackson used to get into some pretty nasty turf battles. South Dakota should be ashamed for having elected someone like this to the Senate.

14 posted on 09/12/2007 5:51:22 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

How long until a former (or current) Dem Senator or Congress Critter is captured or killed by the US military on the field of battle in Iraq or Afghanistan?


15 posted on 09/12/2007 5:52:20 AM PDT by elizabetty (The job of POTUS is not about ideology alone; it is about COMPETENCE to do the job WELL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
Senator Johnson needs to be asked if he agrees with this elder statesman of his homestate party.

Johnson's response: "Umm . . . ahhh . . . me want pudding now."

16 posted on 09/12/2007 5:52:23 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Nice that it’s once again OK to be a Nazi, eh, Senator?


17 posted on 09/12/2007 5:56:18 AM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Another fine load of muslim tyyaqh!


18 posted on 09/12/2007 6:08:06 AM PDT by Biggirl (A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Between this and that “Don’t you know who I am” moron on Iran TV, the dems are REALLY looking good.


19 posted on 09/12/2007 6:22:42 AM PDT by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elizabetty
How long until a former (or current) Dem Senator or Congress Critter is captured or killed by the US military on the field of battle in Iraq or Afghanistan?

Let's see...I'd like a Jimmy Carter appetizer, followed by a Kerry-Durbin-Schumer stew; a side salad of Gore greens with a Hillary vinagrette dressing. And give me one of those double chocolate Obama-Conyers fudge bombs with some of that sticky vanilla Johnny Edwards sauce.

Now put it all in one of those cute styrofoam containers and toss it in a dumpster.

20 posted on 09/12/2007 6:23:59 AM PDT by RoadKingSE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
James Abourezk is not to my knowledge a Muslim and grew up on the Rosebud Indian reservation in South Dakota where his Lebanese immigrant parents ran a store. His wife Sanna is from Lebanon...not sure if she is Muslim.

Abourezk has long been an advocate for Palestinian causes and certainly is not pro-Israel. He and George McGovern share many of the same political beliefs.

21 posted on 09/12/2007 6:56:56 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Former (thank Heaven) “senator” Abourezk has been drinking the bong water again. What a “maroon”!


22 posted on 09/12/2007 6:59:10 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (Hunter and Tancredo in '08! La Raza - the PLO of the Western Hemisphere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elizabetty
How long until a former (or current) Dem Senator or Congress Critter is captured or killed by the US military on the field of battle in Iraq or Afghanistan?

It'll be awhile, the only on I know of who has served in the current war is Mark Kirk.

23 posted on 09/12/2007 7:41:24 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

I believe he’s a Lebanese Christian.


24 posted on 09/12/2007 7:43:11 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
It'll be awhile, the only on I know of who has served in the current war is Mark Kirk.

I mean Democrats fighting WITH the Jihadis AGAINST the US MILITARY.
25 posted on 09/12/2007 7:44:53 AM PDT by elizabetty (The job of POTUS is not about ideology alone; it is about COMPETENCE to do the job WELL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: elizabetty

Sorry, misunderstood. Pelosi and Kucinich come to mind, Syria is one of the belligerents whether we admit it or not.


26 posted on 09/12/2007 8:04:28 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

27 posted on 09/12/2007 4:23:26 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson