Skip to comments.
GOP's Ron Paul wants all troops home
Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^
| 09/12/07
| JOEL CONNELLY
Posted on 09/12/2007 7:21:50 AM PDT by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 561-579 next last
1
posted on
09/12/2007 7:21:51 AM PDT
by
presidio9
To: presidio9; Clemenza; Allegra; wideawake
Idiot isolationist L.Ron is popular with Seattle liberals?
I’m shocked.
2
posted on
09/12/2007 7:23:37 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Cleveland Indians: Pennant -11)
To: Toddsterpatriot; Petronski; Moonman62
He was drawn to politics when President Nixon severed the connection between the dollar and gold in 1971. You can't make this stuff up.
3
posted on
09/12/2007 7:23:51 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: Petronski
"I don't support abortion, but I don't want to pass any federal law to regulate it," he added. My, what a champion of the unborn. He's personally opposed, but . . .
4
posted on
09/12/2007 7:25:03 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: presidio9
Well, heck, Ron, let’s just disband the entire U.S. military while we’re at it and let every man go for himself. I’m game!
To: presidio9
6
posted on
09/12/2007 7:26:37 AM PDT
by
TSchmereL
("Rust but terrify.")
To: presidio9
7
posted on
09/12/2007 7:28:07 AM PDT
by
TSchmereL
("Rust but terrify.")
To: presidio9
I swear he sounds like a ranting liberal
8
posted on
09/12/2007 7:28:38 AM PDT
by
angelcindy
(Where's the Fence?????)
To: presidio9
"We should only send U.S. forces abroad when our security is directly threatened. Right now, nobody threatens our national security."Oh, OK. "This is just a wonderful, rosy World we live in, Ollie."
9
posted on
09/12/2007 7:28:40 AM PDT
by
bcsco
("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
To: presidio9
“GOP’s Ron Paul wants all troops home”
GOP’s LLS wants paul to STFU!
LLS
10
posted on
09/12/2007 7:29:25 AM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
To: presidio9
In Paul's view, the U.S. invasion of Iraq worked to encourage al-Qaida.
The Socialists say the same thing.
11
posted on
09/12/2007 7:29:53 AM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: presidio9
Has he seen any other Republican candidate he could support for the White House? "So far, nobody," he replied. Perhaps he ought to return to the Libertarian Party, if he has so little in common with the Republican Party.
12
posted on
09/12/2007 7:29:57 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
To: presidio9
We all want our troops home. It is a matter of when and under what conditions.
13
posted on
09/12/2007 7:30:22 AM PDT
by
hophead
( "Enjoy Every Sandwich")
To: presidio9
RON PAUL! RON PAUL! RON PAUL!
14
posted on
09/12/2007 7:30:41 AM PDT
by
Clint N. Suhks
( BUILD THE WALL, ENFORCE THE LAW!)
To: wideawake
"My, what a champion of the unborn. He's personally opposed, but . . ." Actually, his position is the correct one under the Constitution. The Fedgov has no authority under the Constitution to regulate abortion, either for or against---it's a state function.
Don't get me wrong--I'm as opposed to abortion as anybody, but I also believe that our Constitution should be followed---AS WRITTEN (or amended---and NOT by Supreme Court).p Now, if you can persuade enough members of Congress and sufficient state legislatures to pass an actual Constitutional amendment prohibiting abortion--then I'd be all in favor.
To: Petronski
I am embarrassed that this weenie is from Texas. The sooner he loses the better.
16
posted on
09/12/2007 7:30:57 AM PDT
by
Ditter
To: Petronski
Bush has moved us much in this direction by insisting that other nations provide for their own defense and by planning to close foreign bases.
I may fall in love with Paul, as I also agree that the Fed claims to control too much land. Recently, I saw that they have expanded the set aside of TR by ten times. They do a lousy job of managing it. However, I would reenact the Homestead law so the land goes to people, not states.
17
posted on
09/12/2007 7:31:17 AM PDT
by
ClaireSolt
(Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
To: presidio9
Very interesting. From what I can see, his positions are more conservative than liberal on balance, but he's got the college kiddies swooning just because of his opposition to the Iraq war.
He has some very devoted backers, too. His signs appear everywhere around here.
-ccm
18
posted on
09/12/2007 7:31:31 AM PDT
by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order.)
To: ClearCase_guy
Paul/Kucinich in 08!
They could unite the parties, and the American people!/
To: presidio9
Right now, nobody threatens our national security.*************
What a relief. Thanks, Ron!
20
posted on
09/12/2007 7:33:12 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 561-579 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
