Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Petraeus Takes the Beltway ^

Posted on 09/12/2007 8:30:09 AM PDT by WBL 1952

So the two men best qualified to give an honest and comprehensive account of events in Iraq have marched through Congress to say--and show--that the surge is working and America's goals are still within reach. Yet it's a sign of the U.S. political debate that their evidence of progress seemed to make the headlines in none of our leading news sources yesterday.

Consider some excerpts from Mr. Crocker's testimony. The Iraqi government puts its cell phone spectrum up for auction: It nets a better-than-expected sum of nearly $4 billion. At a recent conference in Dubai, "hundreds of Iraqi businessmen met an equal number of foreign investors newly interested in acquiring shares of business in Iraq." Iraqi oil is now flowing out of the country via Turkish pipelines, and the International Monetary Fund predicts economic growth for Iraq of 6% this year.

In the vicinity of Abu Ghraib, 1,700 men--many of them former Sunni insurgents--have joined the Shiite-dominated Iraqi Security Forces. The Iraqi government is quietly offering jobs or retirement packages to thousands of former soldiers, many of them one-time members of the Baath Party. Significantly, it is doing so without taking the politically sensitive steps of declaring a general amnesty or enacting legislation on de-Baathification.

As Mr. Crocker notes, these developments "are neither measured in benchmarks nor visible to those far from Baghdad." It's a point that seems to have been missed by Democrats on the Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations Committees, as well as by such Republicans as John Warner and Dick Lugar. Their collective view seems to be that Iraq is a lost cause because the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has failed to achieve "national reconciliation," on the grounds that a series of legislative benchmarks have still not been met.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; iraq; patraeus; patraeusreport
Great article. Here is another interesting cut from it:

"One element that's still missing is the non-interference of Iraq's neighbors in its affairs. With Democratic Presidential hopeful Dennis Kucinich paying court this week in Damascus, it was especially useful to hear General Petraeus describe Syria's role in Iraq as "malign" and provide specific details of Iran's killing of U.S. soldiers and Iraqi government leaders. Our own sources say Iranian-backed forces are now responsible for 70% of U.S. casualties. The problem of Iran in Iraq is worth another editorial, but as the surge continues President Bush is going to have to get far more serious about proving to Tehran that there really are "consequences" for killing Americans."

1 posted on 09/12/2007 8:30:10 AM PDT by WBL 1952
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WBL 1952

Excellent artcile. The social and business aspects are truly heartening. Progress is made is measurable steps like these...and unfortunately, the lamestream press and tje Lefties in Congress will choose to ignore them.

Pelosi’s response today is as vapid as Barbara Boxer’s yesterday.

2 posted on 09/12/2007 8:36:03 AM PDT by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WBL 1952

My sweet fantasy - Petraeus surrounds the Capitol with troops and arrests the traitors in congress.

3 posted on 09/12/2007 8:36:47 AM PDT by Lexington Green (There ain't no news in the news no more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All



I find it curious that the national press correspondents who were present began asking pointed questions as to troop strengths, locations, equipment and other facts which could only be known by the enemy through covert operations. It is disgraceful that the national press and members of congress conspire to force the disclosure of such sensitive military information, and it is curious as to why the question was answered in detail rather than simply stating that the information is classified.


The briefing that took place on October 5, 2005 began by General Petraeus stating generally what the situation at that time was, which information was more than enough information for our enemies, yet the press continued to press for troop strength, location, and equipment.


The following was reported by NewsBank

QUESTION: General, you mentioned in your opening comments the Iraqis are still volunteering to join the army in large numbers. Let me ask you about the problem of vetting and understanding the extent and level of infiltration by either insurgents or sympathizers. Do you really have a handle on that problem?


Wouldn’t it be useful for infiltrators to know whether or not their methods of infiltration are working? They proceeded to ask exactly how many battalions were in place, how many police and army, how many of those were at what level of readiness, now many would be ready within two, three and four months, how many actual feet on the ground exist, the number of echelons above the brigade and divisions levels, “what specifically the level 2 battalions need to become level 1”, how long will it take to go from level 2 to level 1, what is the personnel turnover in the battalions and how will that affect long-term readiness, are the Iraqis being trained to respect human rights as the Western world understands it to be, are the numbers of troops you reported to us the same number as in the classified documents, is it true that the Iraqi police are not being paid, are you being successful in attracting members of the militia into the national forces,


February 4, 2005 General Petraeus briefed the news media and these were some of the questions:


How many U.S. troops are going to be diverted from counterinsurgency and combat operations and assigned to training?


How many Iraqi security forces do you consider fully capable, capable of fighting the insurgency?


Your request for forces, how many people is that?


where are you getting these new leaders for the Iraqi military…


at what point will these Iraqi security forces be in a position to provide adequate security for the country


December 13, 2006 [1] news briefing by General Caldwell


President Bush yesterday conducted a video satellite with General Casey and a number of commanders, and they discussed the military situation -- the security situation in Iraq. Could you brief us on the results of this videoconference?


Will the US finance Arab Sunnis when the US troops pull out?


September 11, 2007[2] investigation by Senator Carl Levin:


Levin: How many of the 89 capable units in Iraq are capable of taking the lead and supporting the coalition?


MCCAIN: Some argue that ethnically cleansing has already taken place. Why not let it just continue?


MCCAIN: General Petraeus, we agree that the police, or the national police have been a colossal failure. What are we going to do about it? And how many people are we talking about and in the context of the overall national police force, as it is?


KENNEDY: It shows the gradual reduction of personnel -- American personnel over the period. These are the number of the brigades that are going down. These -- has it eventually flattening out -- virtually nothing, that's the chart over here. What is the timeline between these various bars that we have in this chart that's on this -- on the chart that you have over here and that you've distributed here?




[1] Congressional Quarterly Transcriptions
December 13, 2006


Congressional Quarterly Transcriptions

September 11, 2007


4 posted on 09/12/2007 8:41:25 AM PDT by street_lawyer (Conservative Defender of the Faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WBL 1952
“...most Americans also want that drawdown to be honorable and victorious.”

Honorable, victorious AND permanent!!

5 posted on 09/12/2007 9:20:22 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Stay together, pay the soldiers and forget everything else." Lucius Septimus Severus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WBL 1952
... President Bush is going to have to get far more serious about proving to Tehran that there really are "consequences" for killing Americans."

There never have since 1979; what makes you think they'll start now?

6 posted on 09/12/2007 9:44:24 AM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

Some of the Republican inquisitors were just as bad...Warner, Graham, etc. Their tone was disrespectful.

How dare they speak this way to a man who has dedicated his life to keeping them SAFE and FREE?

7 posted on 09/12/2007 11:14:04 AM PDT by Palladin (Satan to Fidel: "Let me light your cigar.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson