Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Over 500 Scientists Have Published Evidence Countering Man-Made Global Warming Fears
Hudson Institute ^ | Sep 12, 2007 | Hudson Institute

Posted on 09/12/2007 2:42:07 PM PDT by Cardhu

A new analysis of peer-reviewed literature reveals that more than 500 scientists have published evidence refuting at least one element of current man-made global warming scares. More than 300 of the scientists found evidence that 1) a natural moderate 1,500-year climate cycle has produced more than a dozen global warmings similar to ours since the last Ice Age and/or that 2) our Modern Warming is linked strongly to variations in the sun's irradiance. "This data and the list of scientists make a mockery of recent claims that a scientific consensus blames humans as the primary cause of global temperature increases since 1850," said Hudson Institute Senior Fellow Dennis Avery.

Other researchers found evidence that 3) sea levels are failing to rise importantly; 4) that our storms and droughts are becoming fewer and milder with this warming as they did during previous global warmings; 5) that human deaths will be reduced with warming because cold kills twice as many people as heat; and 6) that corals, trees, birds, mammals, and butterflies are adapting well to the routine reality of changing climate.

Despite being published in such journals such as Science, Nature and Geophysical Review Letters, these scientists have gotten little media attention. "Not all of these researchers would describe themselves as global warming skeptics," said Avery, "but the evidence in their studies is there for all to see."

The names were compiled by Avery and climate physicist S. Fred Singer, the co-authors of the new book Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years, mainly from the peer-reviewed studies cited in their book. The researchers' specialties include tree rings, sea levels, stalagmites, lichens, pollen, plankton, insects, public health, Chinese history and astrophysics.

"We have had a Greenhouse Theory with no evidence to support it-except a moderate warming turned into a scare by computer models whose results have never been verified with real-world events," said co-author Singer. "On the other hand, we have compelling evidence of a real-world climate cycle averaging 1470 years (plus or minus 500) running through the last million years of history. The climate cycle has above all been moderate, and the trees, bears, birds, and humans have quietly adapted."

"Two thousand years of published human histories say that the warm periods were good for people," says Avery. "It was the harsh, unstable Dark Ages and Little Ice Age that brought bigger storms, untimely frost, widespread famine and plagues of disease." "There may have been a consensus of guesses among climate model-builders," says Singer. "However, the models only reflect the warming, not its cause." He noted that about 70 percent of the earth's post-1850 warming came before 1940, and thus was probably not caused by human-emitted greenhouse gases. The net post-1940 warming totals only a tiny 0.2 degrees C.

The historic evidence of the natural cycle includes the 5000-year record of Nile floods, 1st-century Roman wine production in Britain, and thousands of museum paintings that portrayed sunnier skies during the Medieval Warming and more cloudiness during the Little Ice Age. The physical evidence comes from oxygen isotopes, beryllium ions, tiny sea and pollen fossils, and ancient tree rings. The evidence recovered from ice cores, sea and lake sediments, cave stalagmites and glaciers has been analyzed by electron microscopes, satellites, and computers. Temperatures during the Medieval Warming Period on California's Whitewing Mountain must have been 3.2 degrees warmer than today, says Constance Millar of the U.S. Forest Service, based on her study of seven species of relict trees that grew above today's tree line.

Singer emphasized, "Humans have known since the invention of the telescope that the earth's climate variations were linked to the sunspot cycle, but we had not understood how. Recent experiments have demonstrated that more or fewer cosmic rays hitting the earth create more or fewer of the low, cooling clouds that deflect solar heat back into space-amplifying small variations in the intensity of the sun.

Avery and Singer noted that there are hundreds of additional peer-reviewed studies that have found cycle evidence, and that they will publish additional researchers' names and studies. They also noted that their book was funded by Wallace O. Sellers, a Hudson board member, without any corporate contributions.

Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 Years is available from Amazon.com: http://www.amazon.com/Unstoppable-Global-Warming-Every-Years/dp/0742551172 /ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-6773465-0779318?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1189603742&sr=1-1

For more information, please contact Dennis Avery, Hudson Institute Senior Fellow and co-author of Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 Years, at 540-337-6354: Email: cgfi@hughes.net

Hudson Institute


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechange; global; globalwarming; gorebullwarning; warming
You will all like this one.
1 posted on 09/12/2007 2:42:14 PM PDT by Cardhu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

I do and it just proves that fat Al is in it for the money.


2 posted on 09/12/2007 2:51:11 PM PDT by freekitty (May the eagles long fly over our beautiful and free American sky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

But, but, there is a consensus!


3 posted on 09/12/2007 2:51:28 PM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

This needs a BTTT.


4 posted on 09/12/2007 2:51:36 PM PDT by vandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

thanks, bfl


5 posted on 09/12/2007 2:52:33 PM PDT by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou

uh oh. don’t make AlGore get his slideshow going.


6 posted on 09/12/2007 2:53:03 PM PDT by RolandBurnam (soylent brown is poop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu
It is very common for a paper correcting some aspect of climate change (used in the broadest sense) presented by the AGW folks, to include a statement of faith supporting the idea of AGW, which is otherwise unsupported by the paper.

I.E. a paper on the population of a skunk-fish being improved by nutrient change x expected to be caused by GW, rather than inhibited, will include a statement that verbally endorses that GW is man-made and serious, without anything studied in the paper that is relevant to whether or not AGW exists.

7 posted on 09/12/2007 2:53:23 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu
:)
8 posted on 09/12/2007 2:53:31 PM PDT by mirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mirkwood

lol, what happened to the 19th century?


9 posted on 09/12/2007 2:56:33 PM PDT by Cruising Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

The Gaia-worshippers said that there was scientific consensus. They just didn’t disclose that it was in favor of the other side....


10 posted on 09/12/2007 3:03:51 PM PDT by Master Shake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Nearly every day now there are stories like this.
The fear mongering is failing.


11 posted on 09/12/2007 3:05:10 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou
But, but, there is a consensus!

You forgot.......

....there is a consensus, that cannot be disputed....

Just ask what's her yap on the Weather Channel, she'll tell ya!

12 posted on 09/12/2007 3:07:16 PM PDT by LasVegasMac (Islam: Bringing the world death and destruction for 1400 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mirkwood
1200’s with modern lock


13 posted on 09/12/2007 3:12:22 PM PDT by CHEE (You don't have to practice to be miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu
A new analysis

A new study is just in. There is now a consenus that Al Gore is a boob.

14 posted on 09/12/2007 3:14:02 PM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LasVegasMac
Just ask what's her yap on the Weather Channel, she'll tell ya!

Ya mean this clown?


15 posted on 09/12/2007 3:14:20 PM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
Nearly every day now there are stories like this. The fear mongering is failing.

we see stories like this, but the MSM ignores anything that could arm the AGW fanatics. AGW is the evil left's scam to impose a totalitarian dictatorship and destroy capitalism. The left is winning with their lies about Global Warming. I am sure the evil anti-human freaks at realclimate are probably disputing this today. AGW will likely turn out to be the greatest fraud in human history. If Gore and his ilk have their way, civilization will be destroyed (to their happiness)

16 posted on 09/12/2007 3:19:25 PM PDT by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sand88

arm=harm


17 posted on 09/12/2007 3:20:00 PM PDT by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou
Ya mean this clown?

since learning of this freaks fraudulent claims, the Weather channel has not been viewed in my household. She is another evil leftist.

18 posted on 09/12/2007 3:22:11 PM PDT by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou
Yep, she be the lead moron at the weather channel.

Thanks for the name refresh....I'll have to work on my GIGO filter.

19 posted on 09/12/2007 3:31:10 PM PDT by LasVegasMac (Islam: Bringing the world death and destruction for 1400 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sand88

Ditto.


20 posted on 09/12/2007 3:31:25 PM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sand88

Oh of course the MSM will not cover it.

That is our job to point out the FACTS and scream them to high heaven everywhere we can.
Scientific process includes rigorously challenging theorys, the “warm mongerers” cannot avoid that no matter how hard they try. It will find them.


21 posted on 09/12/2007 3:32:42 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

blasphemers!!! to the pyre!!!


22 posted on 09/12/2007 3:53:00 PM PDT by Ancient Drive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancient Drive

ROTFLMAO


23 posted on 09/12/2007 4:08:00 PM PDT by Cardhu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mirkwood

But your pic left out year 2000. That would be a “G” string, I think.


24 posted on 09/12/2007 4:09:29 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: vandy

Agreed!


25 posted on 09/12/2007 4:15:44 PM PDT by PeterFinn (Do not wish ill for your enemies, plan it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Global Warming is a reality, the only thing up for debate is the cause.

Most likely the true answer is it is a combination of several different factors.


26 posted on 09/12/2007 4:16:04 PM PDT by LM_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy
Most likely the true answer is it is a combination of several different factors.

Yup, the sun, the sun, and ummmmmm...let's see...oh...the sun.

27 posted on 09/12/2007 4:18:47 PM PDT by HerrBlucher (He's the coolest thing around, gonna shut HRC down, gonna turn it on, wind it up, blow em out, FDT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...
Ping!
28 posted on 09/12/2007 4:23:46 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Wednesday, September 12, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cruising Speed

Good catch.


29 posted on 09/12/2007 4:31:34 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cruising Speed
lol, what happened to the 19th century?

The last year of the 19th century was 1900.

30 posted on 09/12/2007 4:38:46 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

But . . . but . . . . but . . . according to Fat Albert (Goreon) and the UN’s IPCC, there is a CONSENSUS of scientists agreeing that global warming is caused by (North American) human activity!!!!!

How is it possible for the likes of the goreon and the IPCC to be wrong!!??

/sarc


31 posted on 09/12/2007 4:39:09 PM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

HERETICS! BURN THEM AT THE STEAK!


32 posted on 09/12/2007 6:08:47 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Global Warming Ping...


33 posted on 09/12/2007 6:37:06 PM PDT by CedarDave (Vietnam vet supporting today's freedom fighting men and women and their families.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

DOH! That’s “stake” not steak.


34 posted on 09/12/2007 7:22:09 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Book marked.


35 posted on 09/12/2007 7:33:15 PM PDT by Delacon (When in doubt, ask a liberal and do the opposite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping.


36 posted on 09/12/2007 8:34:19 PM PDT by GOPJ (It's not the spelling ---- groupthink's killing newspapers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off


Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown

New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

Ping me if you find one I've missed.



37 posted on 09/13/2007 2:48:54 AM PDT by xcamel (FDT/2008 -- talk about it >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher

No there are other factors that help increase the problem, but my definition without the sun - it would be -200 below zero or less here on the earth.


38 posted on 09/13/2007 10:44:18 AM PDT by LM_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sand88

SCENARIO: The United States and other “industralized” nations are suffering through an industry-hostile era, wherein producing widgets and gadgets is virtually punishable by law, to the point all widgets and gadgets are made in developing and rogue states.

QUESTION: What do the profit-oriented do to survive?

ANSWERS: Create a crisis (AGW). Invent a convenient solution (Tax carbon emission via carbon credits). Profer the solution. Lobby the solution into writ. Profit from the solution.

Could the clan AGW believers be determined financially exploit each pore on every carbon-based creature in the world?

Al Gore allegedly owns a carbon credit trading brokerage, or has some strange influence over it. Mary Nichols , an alleged progenitor of emission credits and California bureaucrat, has a vested interest is more than a dozen energy companies, and she’s married to a lawyer who does work for Exxon-Mobil.

Oil companies, public utilities and the largest manufacturers love the AGW idea. They now have a way to profit from on a global scale. And you and I will be forced to pay for it.

The AGW context is, indeed, the greatest fraud in modern human history.


39 posted on 09/13/2007 2:24:44 PM PDT by Dave HW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson