Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani demands MoveOn's New York Times ad rate
The Hill ^ | September 13, 2007 | Sam Youngman

Posted on 09/13/2007 12:07:41 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) said Thursday he is asking the New York Times for the "same heavily discounted rate they gave MoveOn.org," for his campaign to run an ad in Friday's paper.

Giuliani, calling MoveOn.org's controversial "General Betray Us" ad "abominable," said his campaign is asking the paper for a comparable rate for an ad to run following the President Bush's speech on Iraq. The New York Post reported that MoveOn.org paid less than 40 percent of the regular ad rate.

The former mayor said his ad "will obviously take the opposite view" from MoveOn.org, which argued in its ad that Gen. David Petraeus is "cooking the books" on Iraq and cherry picking facts that support his recommendation to keep a large number of troops in Iraq for some time.

Giuliani continued to include Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) in his criticisms for her saying that it would take "a willing suspension of disbelief" to accept at face value Gen. David Petraeus report on the situation in Iraq. Giuliani interpreted Clinton's remarks at a hearing earlier this week as questioning the general's integrity.

"We think that her attack on Gen. Petraeus was a follow-up to the MoveOn.org/Times attack," Giuliani told reporters in Atlanta.

Giuliani reiterated that he agrees with Petraeus's assessment of the Iraq War, and called MoveOn.org's ad attacking "an American general in a time of war" unprecedented.

"It's time for Americans to really assist that American politicians move beyond character assassination," Giuliani said. "And this is exactly what they tried to do with Gen. Petraeus. Well, it's one thing when politicians do it to each other. It's another thing when it's done to an American general who has put his life at risk to protect us."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; US: New York
KEYWORDS: ads; giuliani; moveon; nyt; partisanmedia; rudy; rudygiuliani; thenextpresident
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last
Previous story here:
MoveOn.org Gets MASSIVE Discount Rate for 'Betray Us' Advocacy Ad

1 posted on 09/13/2007 12:07:44 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

Fat chance.


2 posted on 09/13/2007 12:08:53 PM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

Dont hold your breath Rudy. The Slimes never liked you.


3 posted on 09/13/2007 12:09:05 PM PDT by Long Island Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

Sean’s reading this right now.


4 posted on 09/13/2007 12:10:13 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a Liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
I hope he gets it. Notwithstanding our views about his social liberalism, if the New York Times refuses to give America's Mayor that heavily discounted rate they gave MoveOn, it will show just how deep the bias runs in the MSM.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

5 posted on 09/13/2007 12:10:23 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

Even if they disclose one I am sure it will be a lie. For all we know the Slimes ran it for free.


6 posted on 09/13/2007 12:12:01 PM PDT by stm (Fred Thompson in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

As much as I despise Guiliani, every once in a while he pulls something like this that makes me smile...


7 posted on 09/13/2007 12:13:21 PM PDT by kevkrom (The religion of global warming: "There is no goddess but Gaia and Al Gore is her profit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

Good move..


8 posted on 09/13/2007 12:13:46 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
Giuliani continued to include Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) in his criticisms for her saying that it would take "a willing suspension of disbelief" to accept at face value Gen. David Petraeus report on the situation in Iraq. Giuliani interpreted Clinton's remarks at a hearing earlier this week as questioning the general's integrity.

And imagine, this woman wants to be Commander in Chief. How would she respond to other military officers if she were President? This woman cannot be trusted to run a vacuum cleaner much less the United States.

9 posted on 09/13/2007 12:15:59 PM PDT by mtg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
Good move from Guiliani. Aggressive. Wish more Republicans were this feisty.
Disclaimer: I support FDT for your President.
10 posted on 09/13/2007 12:16:02 PM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

I still wouldn’t vote for him, but I’ll give Rudy points for this.


11 posted on 09/13/2007 12:16:21 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

I like the idea, but I’d find another way to do it.

Why pump $65,000 dollars or any amount into that floater?


12 posted on 09/13/2007 12:19:44 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
Cool.

I hope he calls the Dims what they are; UnAmerican; who aid and abet our enemy in Iraq.

13 posted on 09/13/2007 12:19:50 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Exactly why I hope Giulani gets the nomination.

He will clearly be the toughest in executing the WOT.


14 posted on 09/13/2007 12:20:32 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

Credit where credit is due for Mr. G. If the Slimes doesn’t sell his campaign the discounted ad space, I hope he can get a LOT of media mileage out of the Slimes’ refusal to do so.

And, if the mayor manages to strongarm the Slimes into the discount rate? Bravo! Whatever ad he’d run there in support of our troops and their mission would get a lot of attention. It’s not only good campaign strategy, it’s good for America. He may not be my candidate, but he gets props from me for this.


15 posted on 09/13/2007 12:21:51 PM PDT by lonevoice (It's always "Apologize to a Muslim Hour"...somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

When Rudy’s right, he’s right.

Good for him.


16 posted on 09/13/2007 12:22:23 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
That was bargain for the NT Times. Having someone pay them for something they would have loved to just put on the front page themselves.
17 posted on 09/13/2007 12:25:09 PM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

Rudy is about the only one thus far that’s really taking issue with this!!!!! NYSlimes had better give him the same rate as they gave enemies of America!!!!


18 posted on 09/13/2007 12:25:47 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

agreed


19 posted on 09/13/2007 12:26:23 PM PDT by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mtg
it would take "a willing suspension of disbelief" to accept at face value a word that came from the mouth of Hillary or Bill Clinton's mouths.
20 posted on 09/13/2007 12:26:45 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mtg
it would take "a willing suspension of disbelief" to accept at face value a word that came from the mouth of Hillary or Bill Clinton.
21 posted on 09/13/2007 12:27:02 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Maybe at $65,000 it costs them money to run the ad?


22 posted on 09/13/2007 12:28:29 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

Bravo, Rudy!


23 posted on 09/13/2007 12:33:02 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
Good luck Rudy — maybe for Osama, but not for you.
24 posted on 09/13/2007 12:34:39 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

Shweeet. Good move.

Actually, I’m pretty sure I read someplace that newspapers and other media outlets *must* charge the same rate for political ads. By law.

Could be that the NYT may get to sell a whole *lot* of pages at that rate. [snicker]


25 posted on 09/13/2007 12:38:17 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I hope he gets it. Notwithstanding our views about his social liberalism, if the New York Times refuses to give America’s Mayor that heavily discounted rate they gave MoveOn, it will show just how deep the bias runs in the MSM.

I’m glad someone called the Slimes on this. I’m pretty sick of the libs getting by with treachery. Go Rudy! I’m may not vote for you but I am with you on this one!

26 posted on 09/13/2007 12:38:42 PM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

RUDY!!! WTG, take on the beasts.


27 posted on 09/13/2007 12:38:58 PM PDT by JFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
So Rudy's the only Republican candidate to notice this big money give away by the Times? He must be the only one who is Wide Awake.
Where's the somnolent Fred? In his hammock on his porch - a Mint Julip glass half empty by his side.

Well, it doesn't matter, because we all know Rudy=Hillary - Rudy kills babies, Rudy will Personally lead the raid on YOUR house to take your guns, & etc. /sarc/

28 posted on 09/13/2007 12:45:01 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Have you, by chance, seen the video of this? No way it is extemp. She delivers it in a halting and stilted way, showing it was rehearsed and not at all responsive to the testimony. That may because she is all about beliefs, anyway. don’t bother her with facts.


29 posted on 09/13/2007 12:46:39 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

I think the New York Times has screwed itself. My understanding is that media outlets are required, by law, to charge political campaign ads no more than the best rate they have offered to other advertising. It seems the New York Times just cut their across the board adverstising rate to all campaigns by 60%. I hope every campaign runs in and takes advantage of the new, bargain basement pricing.


30 posted on 09/13/2007 12:49:33 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

MoveOn.Org is a left wing group. Laws and ethics don’t apply to them.


31 posted on 09/13/2007 12:50:36 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

Good move by Guiliani. The average non-news-junky (even the Democrats) in America will be able to see the contrast between the far left America despisers and everyone else.

So, when will Pinch Sulzberger’s name be familiar to the non-news-junky?


32 posted on 09/13/2007 12:55:11 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again. And Always Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

I can’t wait to see the thirs quarter balance sheet for the Slimes now... HA!


33 posted on 09/13/2007 12:57:26 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again. And Always Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Agreed! It’s a win-win situation for Mr G on this one.


34 posted on 09/13/2007 1:01:56 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: shield

Rudy is about the only one thus far that’s really taking issue with this!!!!!


Exactly. Rudy is a fighter and going after liberalism’s Dark Star, the NY Times. The rest of the GOP is fast asleep. This on the heels of Rudy taking on Hillary over her comments about Petreaus.

Rudy is going what he has always done:

Lead.


35 posted on 09/13/2007 1:07:32 PM PDT by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

Then let’s buy up some adds... LOL


36 posted on 09/13/2007 1:08:54 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
I'm not an attorney, but the New York Times may HAVE to give Giuliani the same rate it gave MoveOn.org. I don't think a newspaper can give one party or its partisans a lower rate than those of the other.

With a name like "Eli Pariser," now to be called "Eli Parasite," MoveOn PAC's director should have thought twice before calling a distinguished soldier "General Betray Us." Please feel free to COPY (not link, it uses my bandwidth) the following.

Here is what MoveOn says about Catholics:


37 posted on 09/13/2007 1:09:49 PM PDT by Winged Hussar (http://moveonpleasemoveon.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

That’s what I was thinking. Buy an add, put the Alger Hiss worshipers out of business.


38 posted on 09/13/2007 1:14:09 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
James Taranto at Opinion Journal is arguing that the discounted rate, if it really is a discount rather than something they do all the time, violates campaign-finance laws. Moveon.org is a PAC, and the Times is a corporation. According to him corporations are not allowed to make contributions, including in-kind ones, to PACs.

I wonder if such a challenge can be brought at the FEC.

39 posted on 09/13/2007 1:15:42 PM PDT by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bitsy
As of now, I'm supporting Fred Thompson for the GOP presidential nomination and I sure wish he had made this demand, instead of Rudy.

Still, its a good move on Giuliani's part, even if the New York Times ignores his demand, which they probably will. Like most conservatives, I'm hoping that the despicable Moveon.org attack ad against General Petraeus - as run in the New York Times for a discounted rate - will wake up many apathetic Americans and show them who they are really voting for when they vote 'Democrat'.

The general has been viciously and unfairly dissed by the left that now controls the Democrat party. Americans should be angry at that. I believe they are, or soon will be. Candidate Giuliani is helping to make that happen with his very public demand of the New York Times for equally discounted rates for his own ad. I still wish Fred Thompson had done this or something similar, although challenging the Democrat candidates to return moveon.org money was good, but basically ignored by the media, of course.

I dearly hope that the GOP and/or the Republican candidates, individually, will pound the Democrat candidates with that disgusting ad for weeks and weeks. Their weak claim that they 'had nothing to do with it' rings hollow when moveon.org is a major source of funding for the Democrat candidates.

I say: make the Democrats eat that awful ad that basically calls outstanding, four-star General David Petraeus a liar and a traitor. Well, if he lied to congress, as Hillary Clinton claimed (using semantics) then why doesn't congress charge the General with perjury? Fat chance. I wish Fred Thompson - or even a Republican Senator - would call on the Democrat congressional leadership to do this, just to keep the story alive and make the libs squirm.

Again, I'm as angry as anyone over that moveon.org ad that defames General Petraeus as a 'traitor'. However, I'm hoping that the anti-war, anti-Bush, anti-American whackado's finally went too far, this time, and that the blow-back will result in a Republican president and congress following the November, 2008 election.

I still wish Fred Thompson would do more to capitalize on this idiotic dropping of the mask by the moveon.org haters.

40 posted on 09/13/2007 1:19:22 PM PDT by Jim Scott (Time Heals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

You may be on to something. Heh heh heh...


41 posted on 09/13/2007 1:20:45 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: stm
Even if they disclose one I am sure it will be a lie. For all we know the Slimes ran it for free.

Hell, I would bet that they even helped to write the ad.

42 posted on 09/13/2007 1:20:51 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Sic Semper Tyrannis * U.Va. Engineering '09 * Friends Don't Let Friends Vote Democrat * Fred in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

Same here. I love that he called sHrillery out. All out melitary deserves our respect.


43 posted on 09/13/2007 1:22:46 PM PDT by vpintheak (Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dog

The Times will accept Rudy’s money. Matter of fact their readership will swell if only for a day. If they allow each and every candidate to buy one pagers it will be proof that lowering prices (taxes) promotes increased revenue and profits.


44 posted on 09/13/2007 1:22:46 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Number 1 FredHead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

In the End the Joke will be on the Old Gray Lady......hehe


45 posted on 09/13/2007 1:23:42 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Number 1 FredHead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

Every conservative group in the country with the funds should take out a full page ad at this rate.

Hopefully the Times loses money at that rate.


46 posted on 09/13/2007 1:24:54 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott
As of now, I'm supporting Fred Thompson for the GOP presidential nomination and I sure wish he had made this demand, instead of Rudy.

Fred came out with a press release the day this disgusting Ad came out calling on all democrats to denounce it.

I also applaud Rudy for his statement today against she who's name must not be mentioned and for disputing Ron Paul's assertion that we had something to do with 9/11.

47 posted on 09/13/2007 1:25:21 PM PDT by McGruff (If I can't have Cheney, Fred will have to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott
In his years in New York, Giuliani used the old Fiorello LaGuardia technique of going for the opponent's weakest point and forcing him to defend it.

When the Brooklyn Museum did that exhibition of sacriligious art, Giuliani hit the local liberals hard. Had they been smart, they would have shut up or simply changed course. But they just had to reflexively defend the indefensible. Their doctrine demanded it. They never lived it down.

48 posted on 09/13/2007 1:29:32 PM PDT by Publius (A = A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater

He actually was the ONLY one who said what needed to be said about the LIBBY conviction.


49 posted on 09/13/2007 1:31:50 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mtg
And imagine, this woman wants to be Commander in Chief. How would she respond to other military officers if she were President?

The same way she and her staff did when her husband was in office.

I, and a number of others, used to absolutely dread her occasional appearances in the Pentagon.

50 posted on 09/13/2007 1:38:29 PM PDT by surely_you_jest (I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson