Christians will not be Prosecuted for Voicing Opposition to Homosexuality Northern Irish Judge Rules

LifeSiteNews.com ^ | September 11, 2007 | Hilary White

[monomaniac]

Christians will not be Prosecuted for Voicing Opposition to Homosexuality Northern Irish Judge Rules

By Hilary White

BELFAST, September 11, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The homosexual political movement in Britain was dealt a rare setback this week as a Northern Irish court ruled to curb some parts of notorious regulations. The Sexual Orientation Regulations of the Equality Act, that came into effect in January, would have allowed gay activists in Northern Ireland to prosecute people expressing religious oppositions to the homosexual lifestyle. The judge struck down the harassment provisions appearing in the legislation for Northern Ireland but supported the Regulations in general. 

According to the ruling, Christians or other religious people will now be allowed to "express their disapproval" of homosexuality in public. 

In his 42-page judgment, Mr Justice Weatherup at the High Court in Belfast, ordered that the provisions be set aside because not enough time had been allowed for consultation before the government introduced the legislation.

The Christian Institute, a nondenominational Christian charity, with a group of churches, launched a suit against the SOR's. The passage of the secondary legislation was met with protests from Christians, Jews and Muslims who saw in them further encroachment on the principles of religious freedom in the UK.

Churches and groups represented in the suit included the Reformed Presbyterian Church, the Congregational Union, the Evangelical Presbyterian Church, the Association of Baptist Churches, the Fellowship of Independent Methodist Churches and Christian Camping International. The Catholic Church came into the case later as an "intervenor".

The ruling comes at the moment when the Labour government is contemplating new legislation that it claims will protect people from "hostile or humiliating environments". Christian groups are warning that the proposed legislation will lead to further restrictions on religious belief.

The Daily Telegraph reports that the Lawyers' Christian Fellowship has warned that the new proposals, which may be included in a Single Equality Bill, could allow homosexuals to sue clergy for preaching against homosexual activity. The group said that churches could be sued for "gently refusing membership" to an unrepentant, practicing homosexual.

In his ruling, Mr. Justice Weatherup said he did not believe that the regulations unfairly treat evangelical Christians "less favourably than other persons to the extent that they are subject to civil liability for manifesting the orthodox belief in relation to homosexuality."

"I am satisfied that the regulations do not treat evangelical Christians less favourably than others."

Despite this, Colin Hart, director of the Christian Institute, told the BBC that he was "delighted" the harassment portion of the legislation had been struck down. "It means that freedom of speech is preserved," said Mr. Hart.

Ben Summerskill of Stonewall, the premier homosexual lobby group in Britain, told Pink News, the homosexual online news source, "It is a small Pyrrhic victory for the Christian fundamentalist organisations that a very small part of the regulations, that we are not convinced are actually needed, have been struck out on the basis they are not in place in the rest of the UK."

Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:

Homosexual Man Wins "Landmark" "Discrimination" Case Against Church of England
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/jul/07071807.html

Northern Ireland Assembly Fails to Stop UK Homosexual Law, Christian Group Files Suit
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/dec/06121506.html

[glide625]

What happened to freedom of speech?

[StonyBurk]

The problem with having a law on the books is if one righteous Judge decides he will not consider those parts
that ought inflame every Christian —there is always another judge somewhere who will not only consider but madate others obey the invalid and objectionable. Best to keep the unjust and invalid from becoming law to begin with.

[freekitty]

I agree.

[Amadeo]

Sexual Orientation Regulations of the Equality Act

or SORE A** Act

Political Correctness is a powerfully destructive force. Like Communism and Nazism it forces people to behave and think in ways that tear down family and society, and eventually leads to massive bloodshed and destruction.

Satan is very pleased.

[FormerLib]

The homosexual agenda is incompatible with the freedoms of speech and religion, that is why they seek to destroy both.

[al_c]

Can we bring this judge over here?

[Little Ray]

In much of the EU, freedom of speech is only allowed if doesn’t make a protected group feel uncomfortable or “threatened.” Otherwise its “hate” speech and outlawed.

Homosexuals are a protected group. Muslims are a protected group. Christians and Jews are not protected groups.

[paudio]

It is a small Pyrrhic victory for the Christian fundamentalist organisations that a very small part of the regulations, that we are not convinced are actually needed,

Really? Why did you push for it then?

[fwdude]

Christians or other religious people will now be allowed to "express their disapproval" of homosexuality in public.

Well, isn't that "Pagan" of them.

[Charles Martel]

Homosexuals are a protected group. Muslims are a protected group.

Yes, but is the former group "protected" from the latter? Not for long, IMO. This is cognitive dissonance on a cultural scale.

What happened to all those "skinheads" who caused such concern in Western Europe and the UK not so many years ago? I would seem that they were methodically captured and neutered.

[Little Ray]

I’m sure they’re still around, too. Or maybe they grew up. It happens - look at the hippies.
In any case, as long as they don’t kill or maim somebody “important” or talk too loud, they’ll be left alone.
Besides, most of them hate Jews, which probably makes ‘em a protected class...