Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: no dems

Much as I like to see the attention Clinton is getting from this — all bad — it really makes me question whether private money should be allowed in politics at all.

I can’t see politicians accepting money from individuals or groups and not feeling beholden to them. I don’t want my politicians beholden to anyone but me. How much of government spending is payback for campaign contributions ? Eliminating campaign contributions might be key to cutting government spending.

I think I’d rather the federal government set aside a billion dollars each year for political campaigns and make it illegal to accept private money. To qualify to run, you would just need to announce your candidacy and get signatures from some percentage of the registered voters. Getting those signatures would be the only phase where private money was allowed.


8 posted on 09/14/2007 2:34:44 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (Liberals aren't atheists. They worship government -- including human sacrifices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kellis91789

What an excellent idea. More of our tax dollars wasted. More government involvement in elections. Sheesh!


9 posted on 09/14/2007 2:44:59 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Kellis91789

Sorry Kellis, I disagree strongly.

When you say “the federal government set aside” I see “my tax money given to people I may not agree with”.

Is the current system faulty? Absolutely! The fact that the Clintons have grifted their way from in his case, a backwater, second rate horse racing town and, in her case, a hard line socialist college education to the most prominent positions in the free world, lead me to think that if “the federal government” controlled the dispersion of those funds , those funds would be given only to those “the federal government” deemed “worthy” of those monies.

I don’t trust them to spend MY money. It is my right, as an extension of the first amendment to support who I choose. That is why the McCain-Feingold reforms should have been vetoed.

Sorry for the wordy sentence in the previous paragraph.


12 posted on 09/14/2007 3:08:49 PM PDT by hotshu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Kellis91789

Post # 8: Great idea.


17 posted on 09/14/2007 8:49:29 PM PDT by no dems (In the General Election; we must not let America forget that Fidel Castro endorsed Clinton/Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson