Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: darkwing104; EdLake; TrebleRebel; jpl

I definitely agree with you that hindsight is 20/20.

My only disappointment is that rather that focus on avoiding the next attack, Freepers see everything through partisan eyes. There was a time at FR — in the Fall of 2001 — that there was ;open source” intelligence analysis being done. Richard Clarke and others, like Tenet and Scheuer, would agree that 80-95% intelligence analysis is open source.

Instead, we get the “nuke em” and pave the mosques post above — or an immediate tendency to view the DNI’s comments in a partisan context.

His point is not a political one. It relates to the country’s need to focus on avoiding the next attack.

By focusing on that task.

Partisan political bickering is a big part of the problem, as illustrated by Conyers unconstructive comment. And FR has just been contributing to the unhelpful partisan bickering — to an extent that even Bill O’Reilly is criticizing it.

As a result, a vacuum forms and you get Freeper EdLake posting hundreds of articles on his webpage but intentionally excluding and refusing to post the article about the reported seizure of anthrax in Afghanistan etc.

That then misleads the busy MSM or public.

PostalMag is coming out with a 6th year anniversary special today on the anthrax attacks and if the feature suggests AQ is responsible, you can be sure Ed won’t include it in his many hundreds of articles.


38 posted on 09/19/2007 6:19:13 AM PDT by ZacandPook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: ZacandPook
PostalMag is coming out with a 6th year anniversary special today on the anthrax attacks and if the feature suggests AQ is responsible, you can be sure Ed won’t include it in his many hundreds of articles.

If their article is about the anthrax attacks of 2001, which you say it is, I would DEFINITELY put it on my site. That is what MY site is about. Why wouldn't I put it on my site?

If it were just another article about al Qaeda or about al Qaeda's search for Weapons of Mass Destruction, then I would NOT put it on my site, because my site is not about al Qaeda. YOUR site is about al Qaeda.

Why is this so difficult for you to understand? Is it your mission in life to make EVERY web site about al Qaeda? Why do you have this pathological need to put things on MY web site?

Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com

39 posted on 09/19/2007 7:01:29 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: ZacandPook

I tend to agree with the postal workers on Amerithrax — and overlook their heartless (but honored in the breach) “no office supplies” policy. The Postal Magazine in the past has editorialized that AQ supporters were responsible. Here is an outside comment to the same effect.

“Anthrax Letters Still Being Sorted 6 Years Later,” PostalMag, September 19, 2007
http://www.postalmag.com/anthrax-6-years-later.htm


42 posted on 09/19/2007 7:04:33 AM PDT by ZacandPook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: ZacandPook
And FR has just been contributing to the unhelpful partisan bickering — to an extent that even Bill O’Reilly is criticizing it.

Bill O'Reilly???

Now there's a pillar of objectivity.....LOL!!

45 posted on 09/19/2007 7:07:49 AM PDT by Osage Orange (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson