Posted on 09/20/2007 6:00:42 AM PDT by spacejunkie
WASHINGTON, Sept 20, 2007 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ -- The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights will hear expert testimony on transracial foster parenting and adoption. The Commission will examine whether transracial foster care and adoption serve the best interest of children, whether MEPA has been successful, and how well the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is enforcing the Multiethnic Placement Act (MEPA). Congress enacted MEPA because of concerns that many children languished in foster care as prospective parents of a different racial group were not provided the opportunity to adopt them. MEPA's broad goal is to abolish racial discrimination for both children and prospective parents in child welfare. MEPA, as amended, prohibits states and other entities involved in foster care or adoption placements that receive federal financial assistance from delaying or denying a child's foster care or adoptive placement on the basis of the child's or the prospective parent's race, color, or national origin and requires states to diligently recruit foster and adoptive parents who reflect the racial and ethnic diversity of the children in the state needing foster and adoptive homes in order for the state's child welfare programs to remain eligible for federal assistance. Critics of MEPA argue that children are better able to combat discrimination and develop role models to confront negative stereotypes when they are of the same race as their parents. Supporters argue that transracial adoption serves the children's best interests. They also argue that children in transracial adoption do as well as other children on standard measures of self-esteem, cognitive development and educational achievement, among other areas. The speakers will include Thomas Atwood, president and CEO, National Council for Adoption; Elizabeth Bartholet, Morris Wasserstein Public Interest Professor of Law, Harvard School of Law; Kay Brown, acting director, Education, Workforce and Income Security, U.S. Government Accountability Office; Joseph Kroll, executive director, North American Council on Adoptable Children; Ruth McRoy, senior research fellow, Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute; Joan Ohl, Commissioner, Children's Bureau, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Professor Rita Simon, Washington College of Law, American University; and Linda Spears, acting senior vice president, Child Welfare League of America. When: Friday, September 21, 2007, 9:30 a.m. Where: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street NW, Room 540 Washington, D.C. The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, bipartisan agency charged with monitoring federal civil rights enforcement. Members include Chairman Gerald A. Reynolds, Vice Chairman Abigail Thernstrom, and Commissioners Jennifer C. Braceras, Gail Heriot, Peter N. Kirsanow, Arlan D. Melendez, Ashley L. Taylor, Jr., and Michael Yaki. Kenneth L. Marcus is Staff Director. Commission meetings are open to the media and general public. SOURCE U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Copyright (C) 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved
This is so utterly ridiculous. Instead of shoving a square peg in a round hole, they should spend their time and resources training, recruiting and bolstering black families and couples for adoption of black children. The black kids want families they match.
Pathetic waste of time, energy and money.
But no studies needed for same-sex couples adoptions, no matter the races involved. /s
a ) This stupid commission could argue that interracial marriage is bad because it produces mixed race children who will face discrimination and be confused about their heritage.
b ) Children need loving parents in a two-parent home more than they need to be instructed that they are black and therefore victims. They will grow up with a healthy self-image if they have the former; and won’t, if they have the latter.
Yeah, segregation is SOOOOOO much better.It's FOR THE CHILDREN.
My black 14 year old adopted daughter would disagree. We have only had her about a year. Last Thanksgiving we went down to visit relatives in the Dallas area to introduce her to the rest of the family. She loved everyone! Had no problem connecting. On Sunday we decided to go to Tony Evans' church since I admire his preaching. There was about a 98% to 2% black/white proportion at the service. She felt uncomfortable after the service. She had been in the system since she was about 2. All of her care since then has come from white families. That is what she prefers.
>> The black kids want families they match. <<
No, the black kids, like any kids, want families. They’d rather have a loving home in a white family, than being shifted around from skin-matched home to skin-matched home. It’s outrageous that so many social workers figure that an endless series of foster homes is better than a loving family, just because the foster homes “match” skin colors better.
I know plenty of mixed race adoptions and these kids seem plenty happy that they have a family and someone to love them.
Liberals can’t seem to get it through their heads that there are more important things in life than skin color.
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.