Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHY DEMOCRATS JUST ABSOLUTELY HATE BEING CALLED .....
Nealz Nuze/WSB Radio ^ | 20 September 2007 | Neal Boortz

Posted on 09/20/2007 9:47:55 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: Turret Gunner A20

I call them Democrat-ICK Party.


41 posted on 09/20/2007 10:22:56 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary '08...Her PHONINESS is REAL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

i saw this book in a store and wondered if you had it.


42 posted on 09/20/2007 10:24:35 AM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

Yes, in the 18th century terms like “democrat” and “democratic” and “democratical” (commonly used then, though not now) were almost always terms of abuse — implying irrational mob rule and demagoguery. Virtually all of the founders thought they were creating a “republic” not a “democracy” due to the problems that are exemplified by our contemporary demagogues: frenzied and irrational appeal to the passions, reckless depravity, etc.

btw, while Joseph Ellis is supposed to be a fine historian, he is also the guy who fabricated a whole section of personal biography over the years to puff up his early years:


http://hnn.us/articles/8656.html

For nearly a decade, in his classes at Mount Holyoke on Vietnam and American culture, Ellis would enrich the course content by recounting his own experiences in the Vietnam War and the anti-war movement. In 2000, in an interview with the Boston Globe, he made a number of claims. He said that he had served in Vietnam in 1965 as a leader and paratrooper with the 101st Airborne Division. He said that he had worked on the staff of General William C. Westmoreland in Saigon. He said that he had been active in the civil rights movement and in the peace movement.

A little research subsequently revealed that he had lied. As an undergraduate he served in the R.O.T.C at William and Mary, emerging from the program in 1965 as a second lieutenant. Instead of serving in Vietnam, as claimed, he had attended graduate school at Yale. He was not active in either the civil rights movement or the peace movement. After he graduated with a doctorate in 1969, he began active duty, but he served not in Vietnam but as a history professor at West Point, where he remained until 1972, when he finished his duty as a captain.

To many it was a shock that Ellis would risk so much for so little.


43 posted on 09/20/2007 10:29:28 AM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
One Democrat became angry with me for using the word “Democrats”.

Just to tick them off more, ask them what do they call themselves in a group. I asked several democrats just that.

"If you are in a meeting, are you a group of democratics?"

That will make them spit nails.

44 posted on 09/20/2007 10:29:50 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (DC scandals. Republicans address them, Democrats reelect them. (Tom DeLay 8/30/07))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20
Oxford dictionary:

ORIGIN late 18th cent.(originally denoting an opponent of the aristocrats in the French Revolution of 1790): from French démocrate, on the pattern of aristocrate ‘aristocrat.’

45 posted on 09/20/2007 10:31:33 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

LOL. Too funny. I hope it gets widely circulated...


46 posted on 09/20/2007 10:33:00 AM PDT by eureka! (Is power so important to the Democrats that they are willing to betray our country? Sadly, yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

Someone should make a change on the Democrat Party entry in Wikipedia to note the history and meaning of their name.


47 posted on 09/20/2007 10:33:00 AM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
They want to go back to their “roots” but shouldn’t their name be the Democratic-Republicans then?
Thomas Jefferson would hang all of them for treason.
48 posted on 09/20/2007 10:39:32 AM PDT by wjcsux (Islam: The religion of choice for those who are too stupid for Scientology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

I’d like to know when they became the Democratic party. It sure wasn’t around in 2000. I don’t remember if they had started using it yet for 2004. Anyway, I still call them the Democrat party, when I can’t call them what I want.


49 posted on 09/20/2007 10:39:45 AM PDT by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20
The negative association for the word Democrat/Democratic goes back to the French Revolution... it was directly associated with the extreme revolutionaries who murdered the king and queen and all the aristocrats they could find... These extremists made a truly everlasting name for themselves by some of the absolutely grisly things they did in the name of the ‘revolution’. The ‘terror’ of the guillotine was not the least of it. One of these wild beasts, once the young lady was beheaded, publicly cut out her heart and ate it in front of the crowd. Of course he was cheered but the ‘revolution’ was a tainted whore from that time forward... no matter the political gains. Crowned heads and aristocrats all over Europe hated the word ‘democrat’ forever after. I remember reading that the human head once severed from the body, yet retained some consciousness. As one unfortunate man was beheaded, someone in the crowd immediately picked up the head and held it facing the headless body lying on the guillotine so that the bodiless head could see its own headless body before losing consciousness. Democrats then did charming things like that...in the name of change.
50 posted on 09/20/2007 10:41:07 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Stay together, pay the soldiers and forget everything else." Lucius Septimus Severus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2
I know Democrats that go (more) insane when Bush does that.

I think that it'd be even funnier if Bush referred to either "Democraps" or the "Democrapic" Party - by mistake, of course. :>)

51 posted on 09/20/2007 10:41:35 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2

Bush did not use the exact term by accident.


52 posted on 09/20/2007 10:41:52 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
I doubt that’s the reason Democrats dislike the term, for the simple reason that

they are card carrying Socialists

it is likely few of them are aware of its meaning at the time of the Founding.

we are not a democracy in the first place - we are a REPUBLIC.

We have forgotten this - or, for those 'educated' in our gov't schools in the past 3+ decades - have not been taught it.

Fred is re-educating us.

53 posted on 09/20/2007 10:43:41 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

I would like to start a movement to have the Republican Party change their name to the “Pro-America Party.” What do you all think?


54 posted on 09/20/2007 10:43:54 AM PDT by veritas2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

Why we are a Republic: democracy = mobocracy


55 posted on 09/20/2007 10:43:57 AM PDT by nanetteclaret (Our Lady's Hat Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes

I don’t think you’ve got it yet...
It’s not any historic reference that they’re ashamed of.

It’s the here and now. Just like communism/socialism/liberalism/progressivism - the label comes to mean what it is referring to.

The Democrats are like any other group that exhibits behaviors that are sub-par. They keep changing their label because everyone eventually associates the label with the behavior.


56 posted on 09/20/2007 10:45:45 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl
I tell them that when they start idetifying themselves politically with “I am a Democratic, not a Republican”, I may consider it.

Perfect

57 posted on 09/20/2007 10:46:04 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: going hot
Deserves enshrinement somewhere prominent.

Maybe a 'Tomb of the Unknown DemocRAT'

Or possibly a road sign with arrow pointing to the 'Swamp of Corruption' 1 mile

Or at the 'Pantheon of Misery and Idiocy' just above the door in 6 foot high letters.

Could be at that special "hole" in the Border Fence saying 'Private Entrance - Democrats Only'

I know I've missed some highly rated and prized tourist/tourista locations.
58 posted on 09/20/2007 10:47:08 AM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

“Liberal” WAS a good, grand term. It meant someone who believed in maximal individual freedom and liberty AND the requisite accompanying personal responsibility.

Communists and people who wanted to be dependent on the work of others sullied the term.


59 posted on 09/20/2007 10:47:47 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
One would expect an organization’s name would be a noun (something) rather than an adjective (a mere modifier of somethin).

but what can we "expect" from a party that uses the jackass as a mascot?

60 posted on 09/20/2007 10:48:15 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson