Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gabz

There is no way that the effects of a drug that is given to girls at the onset of puberty can possibly be known without decades of research. How do they know that these girls won’t be sterile when they reach their twenties or that they won’t have complications with pregnancies or birth defects.


17 posted on 09/20/2007 4:21:40 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

Believe me, I have exactly that same concerns.......additionally it has never been tested on girls as young as 9, exactly my daughter’s age. I believe the youngest guinea pigs were 12 or 13.


19 posted on 09/20/2007 4:24:03 PM PDT by Gabz (Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

You brought up a good point, repeated legal abortions also cause fertility problems, but you won’t be hearing about that anytime on the nightly news. Neither will you hear about how years on the pill also causes increased fertility problems. These will never be admitted because the goal of the promoters is to encourage promiscuity. It’s not natural or normal for women to have fertility problems, in actuality, it’s a rather a rare condition, but you would never know it was supposed to be rare considering how many are afflicted.


64 posted on 09/20/2007 5:03:07 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
There is no way that the effects of a drug that is given to girls at the onset of puberty can possibly be known without decades of research. How do they know that these girls won’t be sterile when they reach their twenties or that they won’t have complications with pregnancies or birth defects.

Because the test cohort went on to have children some time ago. The vaccinated group's pregnancies were more successful than than the control (placebo) group by a small (possibly statistically insignificant) amount. The children born to this experimental group also have, I think, approximately 0 risk of congenital HPV disease caused by the targeted viruses, such as the debilitating recurrent respiratory papilloma.

They have been posted before, but here are some facts from medical authorities, not blogs:

FDA page on Gardasil, including 464-page clinical review.

CDA: Q&A Concerning Safety and Efficacy of Gardasil

CDC: Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Minutes, discusses cost-effectiveness of Gardasil

As for the thousands of "adverse effects," I wouldn't worry much about those. Almost anything can be reported as an adverse effect, whether it be swelling at the injection site or perhaps symptoms days later. VAERS tracks these as very raw data and does not claim that, "Product X causes Symptom Y." Furthermore, many people have adverse reactions to needles. Combine those effects with the coincidental development of juvenile illnesses, and you get the kind of scare the LifeSite uses to get page views. Given a large enough supply of needles and volunteers, I could associate--to use LifeSite's term--placebos with Guillain-Bar syndrome, fainting, dizziness, juvenile arthritis, schizophrenia, drug use, pregnancy, dye jobs, faddish clothing, or any other unwanted outcome under the sun.

123 posted on 09/21/2007 5:31:04 AM PDT by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson