Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran’s vaunted first home-produced fighter jet is a hybrid of Soviet,Chinese,and US technologies
Debka ^ | September 22, 2007, 8:07 PM (GMT+02:00)

Posted on 09/22/2007 7:53:01 PM PDT by Perdogg

The new aircraft, dubbed Saegheh (Lightning), was proudly unveiled before foreign correspondents at Tehran’s international airport Thursday, Sept. 20. Iran’s defense minister Mostafa Mohammad Najjar boasted that the fighter is the equal of the American F-18 Hornet. DEBKAfile’s military sources report that Saegheh comes nowhere near the capabilities of the F-18, which are deployed on US carriers and fly with the Marines.

What the Iranians have done is to put together elements cannibalized from the US F-14 of the 1970s which revolutionary Iran inherited from the shah, and components of the Russian Sukhoi pepped up with ageing electronic equipment purchased recently from Byelorussia. This hybrid product is no match for the latest US and Israeli air force planes or their avionic systems.

DEBKAfile’s sources report that three Saegheh jets at most were assembled for a flyover at Saturday’s military parade which marked the 27th anniversary of the onset of the Iraq-Iran war of the 1980s. Iran’s aviation industry is far from capable of arming its air force with an entire fleet of domestically manufactured cutting-edge fighters.

The pair were paraded to boost morale at home. Since the beginning of the year, the clerical regime has countered proliferating reports of US preparations for an attack on its nuclear industry by showing off one purported new weapon after another and staging spectacular war games.

This is an attempt to scare off the Americans and Israelis from military action and reassure the populace. But, according to DEBKAfile’s US and Israel weapons experts, none of the new weapons has been tried in real combat conditions and their value is therefore unproven.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; aviation; debka; iaf; iran; saegheh; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-93 next last

1 posted on 09/22/2007 7:53:12 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

For once I can believe Debka.


2 posted on 09/22/2007 7:54:55 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

> The new aircraft, dubbed Saegheh (Lightning) ...

The DOD probably calls it the QF-5i target drone.

> ... three Saegheh jets at most were assembled ...

Quite the fleet.

There is video of two of them.
Takeoff performance is abysmal.


3 posted on 09/22/2007 7:57:32 PM PDT by Boundless (Legacy Media is hazardous to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
Yep, sounds like Debka is trying to brake it to Isanutjob, that, if he goes into battle with those weapon systems, against the US and/or Israel; he's screwed.

And he will be.

4 posted on 09/22/2007 8:00:13 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

“This is an attempt to scare off the Americans and Israelis from military action and reassure the populace.”

We’ve learned our lesson well. Any new Iran War will be with long range stand-off weapons, MOABs, and maybe a small nuke or two.


5 posted on 09/22/2007 8:00:52 PM PDT by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

Any pics of the rummage sale fighter?


6 posted on 09/22/2007 8:03:08 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

It’s a 49,50,51,52,53,54,55 automobile.
It’s a 56,57,58,59,60.............
(one piece at a time)

Just an old music quote for those who know...
Seemed appropriate.


7 posted on 09/22/2007 8:06:09 PM PDT by 9422WMR (Allah akbar fumar blacktar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

Johnny Cash! That is one of my favourite Cash songs.

This almost sounds like somthing cobbled together in an episode of Junkyard Wars.


8 posted on 09/22/2007 8:09:25 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
Here is another example of Iranian Military Tech.

Iran showcases its military strength ("Super-Modern Flying Boat")

Posters had a good laugh.

9 posted on 09/22/2007 8:10:54 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Just because it can fly, doesn’t mean it can do much more.


10 posted on 09/22/2007 8:12:59 PM PDT by nuconvert ("Terrorism is not the enemy. It is a means to the ends of militant Islamism." MZJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I'd put 2 of our Lightnings

Against all of their lightnings


11 posted on 09/22/2007 8:13:08 PM PDT by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
Fox has video of the aircraft - but those plans are no match for ours:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

12 posted on 09/22/2007 8:17:01 PM PDT by CyberAnt (America: THE GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

13 posted on 09/22/2007 8:23:38 PM PDT by nuconvert ("Terrorism is not the enemy. It is a means to the ends of militant Islamism." MZJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

They are nothing more than slightly modified F-5’s, which is 40 year old technology. The F-18 would eat their lunch.


14 posted on 09/22/2007 8:24:10 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
I can’t stop laughing. They put a twin tail on an F-5 and that is supposed to make it the equal of the A/F-18E? The mullahs *have* been smoking crack. What is with the mimicking of the Blue Angles colour scheme?
15 posted on 09/22/2007 8:46:08 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

>> Fox has video of the aircraft - but those planes are no match for ours:

I’m guessing their pilots are nowhere near a match for ours, either.


16 posted on 09/22/2007 8:47:26 PM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

You are guessing correctly!!


17 posted on 09/22/2007 8:49:01 PM PDT by CyberAnt (America: THE GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Classified photo of the new mixbreed Iranian warbird.


18 posted on 09/22/2007 8:50:02 PM PDT by theymakemesick (Under sharia law, bacon will be illegal in Americistan, reason enough to keep islam out of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

“What is with the mimicking of the Blue Angles colour scheme?”

Lol. I was going to write, How do like the paint job?

They’re envious


19 posted on 09/22/2007 8:52:34 PM PDT by nuconvert ("Terrorism is not the enemy. It is a means to the ends of militant Islamism." MZJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

This is so pathetic this will be an ass-whooping of Biblical proportions.


20 posted on 09/22/2007 8:56:32 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Thing is, you build a lot of them very cheaply, put only one chem warfare bomb on each of them, then give them to the Hezzies to fly suicide missions into Israel cities.

My bet is Israel is getting a serious wakeup call. Toss a nuke on one of these and fly 500 of them at Israel from Syria and Lebanon. It only takes one or two to get through.


21 posted on 09/22/2007 8:57:28 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (When O'Reilly comes out from under his desk, tell him to give me a call. Hunter/Thompson in 08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
"Just because it can fly, doesn’t mean it can do much more."

It can crash... (never forget!)

22 posted on 09/22/2007 8:57:35 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Yes, envious of highly skilled pilots flying a real aircraft (not a fire sale special).


23 posted on 09/22/2007 8:59:22 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

“Toss a nuke on one of these and fly 500 of them at Israel from Syria and Lebanon”

They have 2 or 3


24 posted on 09/22/2007 9:04:23 PM PDT by nuconvert ("Terrorism is not the enemy. It is a means to the ends of militant Islamism." MZJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

i always thought the F-5 was a fantastic aircraft (for 40 year old technology) - IIRC it was build by Lockheed using their own funds...


25 posted on 09/22/2007 9:08:46 PM PDT by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

I don’t know how it takes to build one. However, let’s say they have 5. Could they take off from an airfield in Lebanon, fly low and not be detected?


26 posted on 09/22/2007 9:10:20 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (When O'Reilly comes out from under his desk, tell him to give me a call. Hunter/Thompson in 08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper

The F-5 is a decent aircraft, but it is by no means a match for a Hornet or Super Hornet. BTW, Mexico’s airforce fighers are F-5s.


27 posted on 09/22/2007 9:11:48 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

fighers = fighters


28 posted on 09/22/2007 9:15:31 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

F-5 Freedom Fighter and F-5G/F-20 Tigershark (twin engine) and some cool square inlets and twin tails.


29 posted on 09/22/2007 9:24:08 PM PDT by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper
"I always thought the F-5 was a fantastic aircraft (for 40 year old technology) - IIRC it was build by Lockheed using their own funds..."

"The development of the Northrop F-5 began in 1954 when a Northrop team toured Europe and Asia to examine the defense needs of NATO and SEATO countries."

fas.org

When I was a kid during the Vietnam War, I had an F-5 model.

30 posted on 09/22/2007 9:38:29 PM PDT by Daaave ("Check your six!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Two words: Lawn Darts.


31 posted on 09/22/2007 10:11:53 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Yah I wondered that too. My first reaction was, these guys just emailed the MSM photos of the blue angels and claimed it was their planes and the press never noticed.

Then I looked closer at the planes.


32 posted on 09/22/2007 10:11:57 PM PDT by festus (No matter how guilty you are a jury will probably get you off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I worked on F-5E’s and F’s for my first 3 years in the Air Force. I cannot believe how much this thing looks like the F-5E. From the hourglass body shape, to the leading edge wing extensions, the speed brake package, the aux air doors. Even the twin shiny tail cans and the main landing gear doors are spot on. Except for the dual tails it is virtually identical from an exterior view point. No clue on the avionics package, but I doubt it will have much that would offer our front line fighters any problems.


33 posted on 09/22/2007 10:20:18 PM PDT by Lost Dutchman ("Weep for the future Na'Toth, Weep for us all." (G'Kar-Babylon 5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lost Dutchman

Well, that’s what it is - a modified F-5. Look where the vertical stab would be on an F-5 and note the remnants of the vertical stab structure (just the base of it and the wedge between the exhaust cans).


34 posted on 09/22/2007 10:33:03 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: festus

Maybe they will rename the demo team The Blue Mahdis.


35 posted on 09/22/2007 10:34:26 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
F-5 was pretty decent 25 years ago, and cheap to fly. The Aggressor Squadron out of Nellis AFB flew them, Soviet tactics. Excellent pilots, they gave F-15 (trainee) pilots at Holloman AFB headaches, at least from what I heard at that time. They were hard to spot due to their small size, and almost invisible profile head-on. Skinny little things.

At least that is what I heard from limited feedback from pilots back then. But, that was a quarter century ago.

One of the Aggressor pilots was a tall, blonde babe.....she gave us young boys pause....

Our Wing Commander at that time told us we were the "busiest airport in the world", mainly due to the massive sorties put up by the AT-38B, the trainer version of the F-5.

36 posted on 09/22/2007 10:35:29 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps; nuconvert

Look at how the tail is welded on. It looks like any wind would pull it off.


37 posted on 09/22/2007 10:40:37 PM PDT by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

How can a civilization be so backward, and yet consider itself a paragon of virtue and progress? It almost defies belief.


38 posted on 09/22/2007 10:41:16 PM PDT by ashtanga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

No doubt. I am not showing disrespect to the F-5 (I know of its performance in the hands of well-trained pilots). The thing is that the Iranians have pieced together an aircraft based on the F-5 and claim that it is the equal of an F-18. Growing-up in San Antonio, I saw a lot of T-38s and T-37s from Randolph.


39 posted on 09/22/2007 10:41:17 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: zeebee

Based on the photos in this thread, it looks as though they used two F-5 vertical stabs and attached them to the aircraft with some big attachments (look at the beefy fairings). I wonder if they modified the formers to accept this added weight and strain (strain when manoeuvering). The F-5 was not designed as a twin tail airfcraft and they have cobbled a twin tail configuration together on the bird.


40 posted on 09/22/2007 10:49:48 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ashtanga

Well, they have a propganda machine in overdrive through state contolled media. Also, they believe their own propoganda. The latter is dangerous for any nation - especially for one whose ego writes cheques that its body can’t cash.


41 posted on 09/22/2007 10:52:29 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
Understood. Imagine Iranian pilots (under oppressive regime, nothing real to fight for) against NATO pilots, let alone an American, Israeli, Aussie or Brit pilot. Even if platforms were equal, it's a slaughter. Superior training, superior equipment = 100:1 kill ratio. Let's keep it that way. (You dumb politicians).

I would have liked to take a ride in that T-37, with the side by side seating.

Witnessed a few A-37's take off from there. Man, that little thing's noise level was OBNOXIOUS with the upgraded engines. (I think it had the same engines as the T-38, without the afterburners.) It hurt your ears almost as bad as the F-15's and 16's.

My ears are still ringing :P

42 posted on 09/22/2007 11:01:22 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Since the beginning of the year, the clerical regime has countered proliferating reports of US preparations for an attack on its nuclear industry by showing off one purported new weapon after another and staging spectacular war games.

Hope the Iranian army has ordered lots of white flags. Don't need body bags. The U.S. will supply them.

43 posted on 09/22/2007 11:05:55 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

I knew someone who worked ground crew for T-37s. He called them 6,000lb converters - they converted jet fuel into pure noise. When in flight, they have one of the most distinctive engine sounds. One of my favourite aircraft sounds comes from the C-5 - no other aircraft sounds like that behemoth.

When I was a lad, I would watch the ANG guys take off from Kelly. They’d pour-on the power and pitch-up about midway down the ruinway and go damned near vertical leaving thunder in their wake.


44 posted on 09/22/2007 11:08:19 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
If past is prologue, then they will never get 10 ft off the ground. Sadam’s AF hardly ever reached the end of the runway. We can target 20 targets from 30 miles. If they move from the hanger, they are targeted.
45 posted on 09/22/2007 11:10:44 PM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

ruinway = runway


46 posted on 09/22/2007 11:21:06 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
The A-37's were even nastier than the T's. And yup, the C-5 does have a very distinct sound. And, they are so big, they look like they are going too slow to stay in the air. Only the C-135 and the F-18 sounds have fooled me to look out the window, thinking I was going to see a C-5. They have a similar sound.

Now you want to hear a totally unique, "What in the world was that", sound, wait until an F-22 flies over your house. That thing is really, really unique in sound. Nothing else sounds like that. It sounds like pure horsepower. When the pilot gooses it, it sounds like distant thunder.

47 posted on 09/22/2007 11:24:00 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

I may not know alot about modern military aircraft, but that last plane to me looks like a homebuilt kit plane. Tell me that is not the iranian produced fighter they are bragging about.


48 posted on 09/22/2007 11:32:44 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

I can’t wait to hear an F-22.

I saw a B-2 flyover at an airshow many years ago. That sucker is eerie. The announcer called our attention to its approach. Everyone turned their heads and strained to see it in the distance (it is a sliver head-on). When it passed overhead, you could finally hear its engines - it was like a faint whisper of an engine. No wonder it is called the Spirit.


49 posted on 09/22/2007 11:34:46 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

That is the aircraft about which they are bragging. It is a modified F-5.


50 posted on 09/22/2007 11:36:18 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson