Posted on 09/23/2007 9:52:12 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
I have attended several meet-up groups and that seems like a fair assessment. I don’t see any leftwingers there, though there might be a few.
Conversely, the cut'n'run rhetoric is working to your delight, signifying a growing discontent with finishing what was started. I don't suppose working in concert with NYT/CNN/ABC/CBS/NBC/BBC/CNBC, etc, shames you one bit does it? With useful idiots like this working against us, external enemies are just a sideline distraction.
Polls are food for fools.
"Go get back in your safe zone under the bed junior."
I will self censor myself as to where you should go, but I know that you don't belong on Freerepublic IMO.
Anti-Iraq War kooks need to GTFO off of FreeRepublic.
Just goes over your head doesn't it? Poor lad. History has already shown us what the result will be. Banging the drum louder isn't going to change the results. As I've said in the past, 'finish' what was started. I don't really care. The result will be the same within a generation
I will self censor myself as to where you should go, but I know that you don't belong on Freerepublic IMO.
Awwww, I didn't know you cared....
Anti-Iraq War kooks need to GTFO off of FreeRepublic.
Remember this very specifically. This time next year, whoever the Republican candidate is he will be talking about ending the police action. It may be under the miraculous 4-6 month turn around of everything going 'great' all the sudden (which in reality it won't be) but the Republican candidate will be calling for a plan to bring the troops home. Maybe you can send him some hatemail.
As for Iran, Bush II and doesn't have the political capital to even try and make the same mistake in Iran
Peace, LUV and dope, man!
Agreed.....but now you're changing horses in midstream. You flatly declared earlier that his support was only 1 to 3 percent. With sampling error, of course, it could be as high as 7 (if the Gallup poll is right) or low as 1 percent. A bit of a double standard there....especially when somebody questions you closely.
Small gummint your Aunt Tillie's patoot! If you think that smaller gummint is likely to be the result of next year's electoral festivities, you may be more delusional than the Galveston idjit.
I'll believe in the sincerity of the paleowindtunnels on the smaller gummint subject when they start devoting as much energy and political capital to abolishing the gummint skewels (not just the DOE) which are the leftist training grounds for the next generation as they now spend on attacking this country in league with their Al Qaeda pals and undermining its warriors and seeking to legalize "recreational" pharmaceuticals.
As far as the article and its author are concerned, has something happened to the usual gang of antiAmerican suspects in the MSM to make either worth paying attention to? Their opinions are such as to be that "up with which we shall not put," as Winston Churchill once grammatically observed.
What would happen if Dr. Demento were to campaign at college campuses on free market principles regarding college tuitions. No Pell grants, no subsidized student loans, no Stafford loans or grants, no substitutes???? Not only would his college supporters (except for an uberwealthy wealthy handful)evaporate instantly but the professoriate would be facing the bleak prospect of middle class existence as well in short order. Does the paleosurrenderman have a “constitutional” provision to justify college pork any more than he has to justify shrimpin’ pork?
Limited sanity, perhaps but Dr. Demento has done zero, zip, nada to “limit gummint” in his all too many decades in public life. Dr. Demento should run 3rd party to draw votes from Mrs. Arkansas Antichrist. He sure as heck won’t draw significantly from Republicans.
The "straw polls" being run at the annual dinners of the Shrimpin', trolleymeister, bus subsidy, antiwar antiAmerican lobbies are not significant. Voting that chooses delegates is.
You do realize that 4% is not a majority or even a plurality, right???
Ouch, that’s gonna leave a mark. :) Great observation.
Sure...but it represents dramatic progress over less than one percent not so long. The trend is consistently on the upswing. Will it continue? Nobody can tell right now. Please note that Kerry was also at 4 percent at this time in 2003 yet won the nomination.
Come to think of 24 percent (Fred's current standing) isn't much of a "majority" or even plurality either. This race is still wide openg and after Fred's fumbling in Michigan even more so. It is a perfect storm of fragmentation which can only benefit folks in the lower tier (especially Paul and Huckabee).
We’ve been warned about the burrito-hosiery complex.
If you are a victim of public education, I can't blame you for your myopic view of History.
"This time next year, whoever the Republican candidate is he will be talking about ending the police action."
You should be allowed to have all the rope you need to hang yourself.
America is winning, will continue to win, and the result, as we are seeing already, will embarass the anti-war, linguini spined idiots, if they are capable of it.
Do you care to put a bet on your assinine assertion that
"This time next year, whoever the Republican candidate is he will be talking about ending the police action."
I'm hoping your as dumb as your foreign policy views are.
ROFLMAO!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.