Skip to comments.Shock Video Shows ‘Racially Motivated’ Beating of White Teen
Posted on 09/24/2007 9:41:54 AM PDT by Altura Ct.
See video here:
Two stories have been filled on this and the second one contradicts the first(big surprise/s). Second one alleges that the fight is NOT racially motivated (Another big surprise/s). Both stories here.
Are you suggesting that the white kid purposely got himself beat up by a bunch of black kids? wow.... Seems kind of dangerous to me. What if he had been killed or permanently maimed? Your suggestion seems like a absurd justification of a brutal beating. Is that really what you stand for?
Of course it was racist! I mean, he was walking down the street, and by his mere presence reminded the black kids of the hundreds of years of oppression of their people, and thus was a non-verbal display of racism.
I mean, it's plain as day...
Part of the gang's marketing campaign, probably.
I’m stunned by the savage attack this white thug perpetrated against those other kids. He repeatedly battered their fists with his face. I could hardly stand to watch it. Their knuckles could have been severely damaged by the repeated hammering from his sharp, angular cheekbones and sledgehammer-like forehead.
This is what can happen when mastery of the deadly art of Face Fu falls into racist hands.
Yes . . . someone get Jesse and Al on the phone NOW!
The victim was lucky his neck wasn’t broken by the attacker who took him by the head and twisted him to the ground. It appeared to me that was his intent.
From wikipedia: “The incident raised a public outcry among those who believed it was a racially motivated and gratuitous attack.” “...in the black community of South Central Los Angeles) the acquittal in a state court of the four defendants, charged with using excessive force, provided the spark that led to the 1992 Los Angeles riots.”
Clearly many blacks considered it to be a racist beating.
Yup. Dead on, Travis.
This thread (and the others dealing with this incident) probably won't last long here. Apparently, there are _some_ subjects too sensitive for even FR to be associated with....
My take: lock the thugs up, and simply ignore those who would demonstrate and intimidate, be they 1,000 or 100,000. Of course, I felt this way back in the sixties, as well!
Well, there used to be slavery in the United States. So this beating was justified....
Odds are it was a gang member recording the event for the homies that couldn’t be there. It probably got confiscated. You know it wasn’t an innocent bystander, or they would have been attacked as well.
On the day the Rodney King verdict came in as not guilty, I was in Charlotte SC for a wedding. I stopped to ask for directions and a black woman approached my car. She had a knife and tried to stab me! I had no idea why at the time.
Speaks to the mentality of a lot of folks. Makes it very hard to look at the ‘individual’ without suspicion.
“Time Magazine saw fit to airbrush his exposed genitalia. It offended some of their sensibilities”
Yeah, the weazels at Time want to show only intact genitalia!
Will the MSM show this a zillion times like the Sir Rodney video?
You need to get back to posting about space aliens.
“The photos of the dead soldier being dragged through the streets was not too graphic to show. Wait, let me retract that.”
“Time Magazine saw fit to airbrush his exposed genitalia. It offended some of their sensibilities.”
Other media didn’t. Several left in the part where the Somali drove his rifle barrel into the dead soldiers rectum and smiled at the photographer.
you’re dealing with FR’s own Al Sharpton....just go read what Jedi thinks is racist on his homepage
Clearly the noose in Jena made them do it..........
Some folks are so brein-deadened by PC-ness, that they would apologize for being white as they were tortured to death.
That song from South Pacific is right, "They have to be carefully taught."