Skip to comments.Make-Believe Reagan (Far-Left take on Fred Thompson)
Posted on 09/24/2007 3:10:01 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I can say exactly when I first knew that Fred Dalton Thompson is dangerous. It is 12:07 p.m. on Sunday, September 9th, in Manchester, New Hampshire, just outside a restaurant called Chez Vachon. Thompson has just served up another mumbling, noncommittal tour through a packed diner of breakfasting locals, sitting glumly through the requisite this-sure-is-great-coffee shot. Then, once the needed photos are banked, the lumbering B-list character actor -- who plays a video called "The Hunt for Red November" at every campaign stop and sells buttons that, in an unsettlingly McLuhanian twist, pimp him as the "Law and Order candidate" -- tries to make a quick beeline back to his bus. But a cheeky local TV reporter shouts at him before he can reach the door.
"Senator!" the reporter calls out. "What's harder, playing the president or being the president?"
It is a sh*tty New Hampshire day; as Thompson stands on the street in a blue polo shirt, cold rain splashes visibly off his bald head. There are times when the candidate's eyes go blank and you almost see a big sign in his brain screaming, "Line! Line!" Finally, he glances back at the reporter and grumbles, "Well, neither of 'em are that hard."
I turn to the TV guy, not sure of what I'd just heard.
"Did he just say . . . ?"
"Yeah," the guy says, dumbfounded. "He just said being president isn't that hard."
I'm still trying to process this when I spot Carl Cameron, the right-wing hatchet man for Fox News. Cameron is whaling on Thompson, doing a mocking impersonation of the candidate's "Security, Unity, Prosperity" campaign shtick.
"We're, uh, gonna be yoo-nited bah owre yoo-nity!" Cameron cracks.
A crowd of reporters doubles over in laughter. Then they get in their vehicles and chase after Thompson to the next event, so they can feverishly record those same hackneyed lines again and again for posterity. They'll laugh in private, but they'll be repeating that sh*t on air with a straight face for the next 400 days.
Well, I think as I stand by myself on the curb, so much for Fred Thompson. After all, logic dictates that anyone who's too much of a lightweight for Fox News is probably...
I freeze. Probably what? Probably a shoo-in for the presidency, that's what! I shudder as I realize my mistake, and suddenly the candidacy of Fred Thompson, which seemed impossibly silly just a few minutes ago, makes deadly serious sense. Thompson may act like a blank slate -- a homespun version of Being There hero Chauncey Gardiner running on a platform of "Whatever you say" and "I'll get back to you on that" -- but he represents something else that no one, after seven years of George W. Bush, could possibly have expected: a new low. It was bad enough when the GOP field was led by a grinning Mormon corporatist and a fascist ex-mayor itching to take his prostate pain out on the world, but Thompson is the worst yet -- a human snooze button, campaigning baldly for the head-in-the-sand vote by asking Americans not to think but to change the channel.
And that, after all, is what the campaign trail is all about. Give voters a chance to go lower than they've ever gone before, and you'll get numbers in a heartbeat. Ladies and gentlemen, meet the next Republican front-runner. ***
In person, Fred Thompson reminds you of a lot of good actors who go numb when asked to play themselves. If you've ever listened to interviews with Laurence Olivier or Robert De Niro or any of a hundred other talented performers who can manhandle a script but seem at a loss when it comes to who they themselves really are, you'll recognize the same thing in Thompson.
That makes it all the more painful when you watch him try to sell his oddly thin biography as a great "American story." He has a few items of note on his résumé: minority counsel for the Republicans during the Watergate hearings (where he tipped off the White House that the committee knew about Nixon's secret tapes), lawyer for a Tennessee whistle-blower who exposed a cash-for-clemency scam in the governor's office, and two largely undistinguished terms as a U.S. senator. In between, there are about twenty-eight years of his adult life where he acted in bit parts in a few movies, and lobbied a little. Thompson's campaign video runs out of stuff to talk about after around ninety-eight seconds.
But he is on television, and has been in a movie with Sean Connery, and in the world of politics -- which is basically Hollywood for the ugly and talentless -- that makes him something close to a god on Earth, a veritable rock star. And despite his disinterested pose and empty-suit résumé, his TV persona gives him a natural advantage on the trail, one that most politicians can only dream of.
You have to see it to believe it, the effect that Fred Thompson has on certain crowds. Reporters who describe his public appearances as "bland" and "uninspiring" and "vague" and "blurry" do so because they're looking for the wrong thing; they're looking for theatrics, for fire and brimstone, for that candidate who can get crowds howling for blood. What Thompson inspires is something much more appropriate for Americans of the TV age: He gets audiences purring in a cozy stupor. Their eyes glaze over and they end up looking like a bunch of flies happily lapping up their own puke.
Anyone who's ever had a problem with houseflies knows that that's the best time to hit them with a swatter, which might explain Thompson's astonishing early success. One poll has him already in a dead heat with rage-virus victim Rudy Giuliani -- despite the fact that twenty-eight percent of Republicans have never even heard of him. While voters often leave Giuliani events wondering if they should hand this seemingly crank-mad Catholic the nuclear football, Thompson crowds walk out with the dazed smiles of recovery-room zipperheads, looking like they've just had their brains removed and couldn't be happier about it.
In his stump speech, the hulking Southerner paces the stage wearing a fatherly expression, giving a Gregory Peck-like pensive rub of the chin from time to time and hypnotically tossing out soothing ruralisms like "ain't" and "wadn't" that descend upon his audiences of besieged Decent Folk like gentle snowflakes. The pulse rate in the crowd goes down, not up. The gritted teeth and wizened anger lines around the eyes of these taut, white Silent Majority faces loosen and relax. Whereas minutes before they were collectively certain of imminent attack by an evil confederacy of Al Qaeda and Mexicans and queers ("What should society's position be on deviants?" one Iowan wonders at a Thompson event) all inspired to violence by their envy of the Decent Folk's shimmering new trucks and almost-new big-screen TVs and prized displays of Christian collectible figurines, they now feel if not safe, then soothed, in the right tent, at least. And their hearts flutter as this humble actor who gave up a big career on TV for them -- for them! -- tells them a story they like, a story about a world where America is still the good guy and no changes need to be made for things to turn out just fine in the end.
I watched this phenomenon in action over and over again. In a dead-still convention hall in Sioux City, Thompson meanders his way through a stump speech that appears to be about absolutely nothing at all -- he makes tamely self-deprecating jokes about his bald head ("You young fellas with good-lookin' heads of hair, enjoy it while you can"), ogles a standard-issue stuffed-animal-bearing Adorable Toddler ("You're a good Republican. Now let's show 'em your elephant") and talks away questions about specific policy issues with inspired flurries of utterly nonsensical hick'ry saws (his take on how to deal with the energy crisis: "We got to learn to skip 'n chew gum't the same time").
When asked about Iraq, Thompson goes into a scene straight out of Hollywood, talking about visiting wounded soldiers at Walter Reed hospital who just couldn't wait for their leg stumps to grow back so they could give Jerry some more hell at the front. "It's the ones who are most wounded who most want to rejoin their comrades," he says.
Two minutes after that last bit, I am outside talking to an older woman named Rita Fairfield, who pronounces herself completely convinced. She likes Thompson's take on national security, among other things, especially the part about staying the course. I ask her why she thinks the surge is working. "From what I heard from the soldiers who are coming back, they're willing to give up life and limb," she says. "The ones that are coming back maimed seem to be the ones most ready to go back to battle."
Huh, I think. Where did I just hear that?
It's only after you run into this lobotomy act ten or eleven times that you start to see the dark essence of Fred Thompson. He is hard to dislike on a personal level: Unlike the overconfident district attorney he plays on Law and Order, the real-life Thompson comes off as a halting, humble, accidental celebrity who's really just dern glad to be here. And his personality seems consistent with his Goldwater-era ideology: A believer in limited government, he seeks to achieve his ends by getting his frankly limited self elected to the White House.
His politics, though, are another matter. As a political animal, Thompson embodies the twisted core of the Sean Hannity/Rush Limbaugh era: He looks you right in the eye with that aw-shucks face of his and tells you sh*t that just isn't true about who we are as a country. In his first few days on the campaign trail, he paces back and forth in front of crowds of Iowans and assures them without blinking that "we have the best health-care system in the world" -- and you sit there wondering how the hell he can get away with saying that when America's infant mortality rate is behind fricking Slovenia's.
But by then Thompson is talking about how France and England are desperate to copy our market-based system of health care. And then he's on to Iraq, where we "went in for the right reasons" because Saddam was planning a "nuclearized Middle East" that "would have defeated all of us," assertions that leave the bad-news-weary crowd dewy-eyed with approval. Thompson represents the essential bullsh*t at the heart of modern conservatism: The fantasy that we are the benevolent envy of the world must be believed at all costs, no matter how much waste or mayhem or loss of young lives is suffered in deference to it.
That's what Thompson is selling: a double dose of Middle American delusion. He's a Grade A nice feller who isn't running for president, even though he is, in a country that doesn't launch unilateral and unwarranted invasions, even though it does. ***
In Council Bluffs, Iowa, the Thompson campaign buses stop at a neatly groomed downtown spot called Bayliss Park to give a gathering of about 300 a chance to meet the nice old actor who talks to his mama. (On health care: "I talk to my mama, who is eighty-seven years old, regularly about this.") The traveling press spills out into the crowd in search of quotes for their preconceived story theses -- Thompson as Reagan, Thompson as the Only Republican Who Can Beat Hillary, Thompson as the Too-Late Candidate.
Standing on a riser in front of his bus, Thompson lays his Goldwater rap on the Decent Folk who have come to the park, telling them that the best thing government can do for the poor is to help them help themselves. "A government big and powerful enough to give you everything," he declares, "is also powerful enough to take away anything." The crowd cheers.
A minute or two later, an announcement sounds that the campaign is moving again, and the reporters, quotes in hand, flee back to the bus. I am headed that way myself when a homeless couple named Dot and Jamie, both weatherbeaten and in ragged sweatshirts, walk up to me and explain that they live in this park, and could I ask the candidate for a favor?
"Can you ask him to get us a public toilet?" Jamie asks. "There's no place to take a f**king sh*t here."
I say I'll see what I can do -- but I doubt that anything good will come of it. The campaign trail long ago evolved into an artificial world of self-involved bullsh*t, a see-no-evil/hear-no-evil parade of pristine, patriotically engaged Americana, where everyone looks nice, a bunch of Ivy League newspaper guys make up the story lines, and you never see the bad stuff.
What Thompson offers is a chance to drag the presidency itself into that bubble, leaving ugly reality behind. His campaign is basically a referendum on what America wants out of its president. Do we want an executive who solves problems and tackles issues, making decisions that are grounded in reality? Or do we want a lead actor to star in a television show about a fantasy America of our own creation, an America where poverty and war and insecurity can be solved simply by keeping them off camera?
That is a heavy, heavy question, a theme straight out of dystopian fiction, and those of us who would vote for reality should be chilled by Thompson because we know that even if America votes for the fantasy, someone is still going to be running the reality.
In the case of Thompson, that someone would be a slick frontman who might play the part of a Goldwater small-government Republican but in reality has made his living as an extravagantly paid pimp for government welfare. As a professional lobbyist in the 1980s, Thompson worked on behalf of Westinghouse, which was seeking billions in federal subsidies for nuclear power plants. (He conveniently leaves that part of his past out when, in his campaign speeches, he mentions nuclear power as one of the "other fuels" that "have to be part of the solution.") He also lobbied for the deregulation of the savings-and-loan business -- a Reagan-era move that helped lead to the infamous collapse of the industry. And between 2004 and 2006 he earned $760,000 lobbying to cut the asbestos liability of Lloyd's of London.
Thompson is frequently compared to Ronald Reagan, with plenty of justice. Like Thompson, Reagan projected for voters a fantasy America, one that didn't need to feel bad about Watergate and could still kick ass, despite having just been whipped by 2 million pajama-clad Vietnamese. But underneath Reagan's goofy cowboy act was a raging ideologue, a deadly serious political force that also pitched to voters grandiose dreams of endless riches and world conquest. The dream America bought from Reagan was wrongheaded and stupid, but it was at least a big dream, a dream commensurate with the breadth and power of the American empire. The people who bought it were mean and overconfident, but they were at least still living on planet Earth.
What Thompson is selling is escapism, pure and simple. He's selling America not as a vast adventure epic but as a timid, forty-seven-minute made-for-cable movie about a folksy small-town dad -- a fantasy that makes no sense at all in the context of a massive militarized oligarchy currently occupying half the world's deserts on borrowed money.
The people who are buying this fantasy are buying out of fear, because they can't bear to look anymore. They've simply given up trying to deal. If Thompson wins -- and he very well might -- that's what it'll be: total surrender. The lowest we've ever sunk.
Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt....
liberalism is the most severe form of retardation.
Call him what you want, but the guy actually gets it.
The whole article can be translated into normal American as the following sentence:
In spite of what the beltway pundits think, Fred Thompson is connecting with people and if that doesn’t SCARE THE CRAP out of the left, it damn well should, because he’s going to be the next President!
Incidentally, I enjoyed the article, as the insults were far better than most of the Romney campaign garbage we hear from the beltway losers. This guy at least has a little bit of talent stringing them together. ‘Human snooze button’ had me laughing out loud.
All these left wing rants about Fred just prove that he can and will win. They see it, they know it and they FEAR it!
He should have followed that up with "But both are a dang sight harder than bein' a journalist..."
Nobody takes this much time, to write this much of a hatchet-piece, on a candidate that doesn’t sincerely scare them to death.
Thompson’s been drawing attacks from Democrats since before he declared ... makes me think we’re on to something.
This is worth a look. This guy ‘gets it’ to a larger extent than most leftist pukes are capable of. He sees what’s happening and he’s afraid.
The best endorsement yet!
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
I’ve seen a few folks question the ‘Fred fear phenomenon’ and claim that we’re all a bunch of delusional weirdos for thinking that all the attacks are because people are afraid of Fred.
Well, here’s a guy that actually puts it down on paper, spelling out his Fred fear for everyone to see. :)
Finally, he glances back at the reporter and grumbles, "Well, neither of 'em are that hard."
What a great ad lib. If JFK had said it the wussy Rolling Stone reporter would have been beside himself - What self assurance! Such wit and charm!
Now can anyone recall, in all her years of public life, has Hillary even once said anything demonstrating wit and charm? What a cold unlikeable shrew she is.
Be afraid libs, be very afraid.
Well, if this silly little hateful screed isn’t enough evidence that Fred is a true conservative, I don’t know what is.
I’ve never even seen this level of hatred and contempt for any Republican candidate.
Uh, wasn’t Reagan just a B-actor to the far left?
LOL, wrongheaded and stupid??? Winning the cold war. Bringing us out of the depths the double digit interest rates and unemployment of the Carter years. Letting America be proud of its country again. Yeah, pretty stupid.
Of course an article with this type of 'analysis' on a Democratic Presidential candidate will never see the light of day.
a fascist ex-mayor itching to take his prostate pain out on the world
Fred fear, Reagan fear, fear of the truth, fear of his own country. All in one article. It’s totally worth reading! :)
It’s worth the read just to see how out-of-touch the R.S. is.
The article mocks the South, middle America, Christians, and wounded soldiers. The obligatory lies about Iraq and health care, too.
It told more about the author and the rag that prints him than anything.
That is not Fred fear, that is a Fred panic attack.
So Fred’s a new low...LOL! Hey, get over it lefties, just think, you have 6’6” of bald-headed, good ol boy, southern fried redneck, conservatism to bash for 8 years.
I got passed the first paragraph and felt like I didn’t get anywhere.
WARNING: If you wish to join, be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.
“Call him what you want, but the guy actually gets it.
The whole article can be translated into normal American as the following sentence:
In spite of what the beltway pundits think, Fred Thompson is connecting with people and if that doesnt SCARE THE CRAP out of the left, it damn well should, because hes going to be the next President!”
Absolutely correct, any Fred heads that haven’t read the article go back and read it, it will bring a smile to your face.
This guy really does reveal that he thinks that Fred is likely unbeatable and he gives very convincing analysis of why (you have to translate the words though).
“We’re, uh, gonna be yoo-nited bah owre yoo-nity!” Cameron cracks.
A crowd of reporters doubles over in laughter.”
That’s the only part of this moonbat spew that means anything.
This is going to come back and bite Fox News right in the A$$!
Didn’t say I didn’t read it.
Didn’t say I read it either.
The two Democrats at the function who weren't reporters. Probably former reporters, caught in the last down-sizing.
In Taibi's world, if you are so dim you won't fall for the DNC's promises of free stuff, you must be either lobotomized or a fascist. If you love your country you're in a dream-world. If you insist that our military (and its commander-in-chief) deliver victory, and be allowed to deliver victory, you are hypnotized.
"Yeah," the guy says, dumbfounded. "He just said being president isn't that hard."
I don't know if thats confidence, bravado, or off-the-cuff smart-aleck, but I like the answer. Taibi doesn't like hearing canned speeches, and he doesn't like spontaneity either. Well, heck, he doesn't like Republicans, and he wouldn't like me. I probably wouldn't like him that much either, although like with most Democrats, if he spare-changed me outside a convenience store, I'd probably buy him a dollar-hamburger. Hope he finds that free rest-room.
I'm for Hunter, but Thompson is a good second choice. I've read his essays, mostly here at FR, and Taibi obviously hasn't. Thompson is a good man.
Fox News is 100% behind Rudy Giuliani. Watch them and you’ll see it, too.
Help Fred counter the MSM: https://www.fred08.com/contribute.aspx?RefererID=c637caaa-315c-4b4c-9967-08d864cd0791
I know they are but this sort of bias by their main political reporter will cost them views and market share.
We could get crap like that from Dan Rather!
Don’t give Carl Cameron a pass on this one, write/call/fax Fox and let them know what you think!
If the ridiculous part about the homeless couple, “Dot and Jamie”, is true, I REALLY wish they had asked Fred Thompson that question. Don’t know about Dot and Jamie, but I’m sure that I would have loved his answer. LOL.
“Absolutely correct, any Fred heads that havent read the article go back and read it, it will bring a smile to your face.
This guy really does reveal that he thinks that Fred is likely unbeatable and he gives very convincing analysis of why (you have to translate the words though).”
You are so right! Made me smile and I just sent Fred another donation! GO FRED!!
I can explain it for the lefties. Fred is the pro-America candidate. There are other pro-America candidates, but Fred is the only one with the slightest chance of winning.
This writer seems so darn mad that Fred is getting traction, that he doesn’t know whether to crap or go blind.
I suggest he close one eye and poot ;0)
Yep. Of course, Fred Thompson is no Ronald Reagan, but he’s also no John McCain, no Rudy Giuliani, no Mitt Romney, no Hillary Clinton, no Barak Obama, and no John Edwards.
Is this the first official “he’s dumb” article. I knew it was coming.
“The people who are buying this fantasy are buying out of fear, because they can’t bear to look anymore. They’ve simply given up trying to deal. If Thompson wins — and he very well might — that’s what it’ll be: total surrender. The lowest we’ve ever sunk.”
This smarmy hyperventilating drama queen needs to sit down and take a deep breath. The little windbag talks as if he’s stared into the abyss and returned to talk about it. Nothing more than a bunch of shrill hyperbole. This kind of over-the-top nonsense can’t appeal to anyone beyond the very hard left. But then again.....it is Rolling Stone.
du verre cassé
My sentiments exactly!
Carl is a little twerp, who needs a spanking.
I don’t believe that statement. There is no way to verify it, either, so the little sissy boy can get away with it.
Positively Alec Baldwinesque.
Fred knew this was coming. Not his "first rodeo."
But Carl Cameron? A shocker ~ if true.
“He was a lousy actor and he’ll be a lousy President!”
I experience a certain satisfaction that Carl Cameron is forced to cover and report on republican campaigns in order to earn his living.
Never realized Carl Cameron’s such a jerk.
“A crowd of reporters doubles over in laughter. Then they get in their vehicles and chase after Thompson to the next event, so they can feverishly record those same hackneyed lines again and again for posterity. They’ll laugh in private, but they’ll be repeating that sh*t on air with a straight face for the next 400 days.”
A feeling of deja vu washes over me. I remember this stuff... Yes,... I’m remembering...
...This is the sort of stuff that they’d report about Ronald Reagan in 1980!
We remember how that went.
Dont insult people with downs syndrome please.. They are ten times more intelligent then any libs !!!!
America's infant mortality rate is behind fricking Slovenia's.Based on the results of my Google search for "infant mortality rate," this statistic seems to be true. Does anyone know why the infant mortality rate in the U.S. is as high as it is, and how it relates to our health-care system?
no argument from me on that one...
You’re shocked that Carl Cameron would display elitist disdain for a southern republican candidate?
IIRC, Cameron is married to a prominent Democrat operative-sort although I don’t recall exactly what she does. Cameron himself is a liberal, I believe.
This doesn’t surprise me one bit.