Skip to comments.
Parallel Universes Exist - Study
BreitBart/Press Association ^
| Sep 23, 2007
Posted on 09/24/2007 4:10:41 PM PDT by anymouse
Parallel universes really do exist, according to a mathematical discovery by Oxford scientists described by one expert as "one of the most important developments in the history of science".
The parallel universe theory, first proposed in 1950 by the US physicist Hugh Everett, helps explain mysteries of quantum mechanics that have baffled scientists for decades, it is claimed.
In Everett's "many worlds" universe, every time a new physical possibility is explored, the universe splits. Given a number of possible alternative outcomes, each one is played out - in its own universe.
A motorist who has a near miss, for instance, might feel relieved at his lucky escape. But in a parallel universe, another version of the same driver will have been killed. Yet another universe will see the motorist recover after treatment in hospital. The number of alternative scenarios is endless.
It is a bizarre idea which has been dismissed as fanciful by many experts. But the new research from Oxford shows that it offers a mathematical answer to quantum conundrums that cannot be dismissed lightly - and suggests that Dr Everett, who was a Phd student at Princeton University when he came up with the theory, was on the right track.
Commenting in New Scientist magazine, Dr Andy Albrecht, a physicist at the University of California at Davis, said: "This work will go down as one of the most important developments in the history of science."
According to quantum mechanics, nothing at the subatomic scale can really be said to exist until it is observed. Until then, particles occupy nebulous "superposition" states, in which they can have simultaneous "up" and "down" spins, or appear to be in different places at the same time.
Observation appears to "nail down" a particular state of reality, in the same way as a spinning coin can only be said to be in a "heads" or "tails" state once it is caught.
According to quantum mechanics, unobserved particles are described by "wave functions" representing a set of multiple "probable" states. When an observer makes a measurement, the particle then settles down into one of these multiple options.
The Oxford team, led by Dr David Deutsch, showed mathematically that the bush-like branching structure created by the universe splitting into parallel versions of itself can explain the probabilistic nature of quantum outcomes.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Technical
KEYWORDS: astronomy; balderdash; bilge; callingartbell; drwho; gottagettagrant; greed; mathematics; physics; quantumbullshit; quantummechanics; rubbish; science; space; sugarcoatedgreed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151 next last
That explains a few things that have happened over the last few years - we got forked in time. ;)
1
posted on
09/24/2007 4:10:43 PM PDT
by
anymouse
To: anymouse
There is a thread exactly like this in a parallel universe.
2
posted on
09/24/2007 4:12:24 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(25 degrees today. Phase state change accomplished.)
To: timer
3
posted on
09/24/2007 4:12:39 PM PDT
by
anymouse
To: anymouse
If this is true, then why do I always have the unlucky circumstance of ending up in the screwed up universe?
4
posted on
09/24/2007 4:13:26 PM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: RightWhale
I read it. Whoaaa where am I?
To: RightWhale
There is a thread exactly like this in a parallel universe.There is parallel universe exactly like this thread - but different. ;)
6
posted on
09/24/2007 4:14:29 PM PDT
by
anymouse
To: Starstruck
7
posted on
09/24/2007 4:14:54 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(25 degrees today. Phase state change accomplished.)
To: anymouse
So what you're saying is.......... uhhhmmmmmm ..........somewhere there is a universe where I'm a good putter?!?!?
I'd hate to try to imagine how screwed up the physical constants that constrain THAT universe are !!
To: Brilliant
If this is true, then why do I always have the unlucky circumstance of ending up in the screwed up universe?Fate. /sarc
9
posted on
09/24/2007 4:15:43 PM PDT
by
anymouse
To: anymouse
Seems Dr. Bollinger (and many in academe) live in one.
To: anymouse
You could slip into a parallel universe and never notice. In fact this could be happening 400 billion times a second.
11
posted on
09/24/2007 4:16:48 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(25 degrees today. Phase state change accomplished.)
To: anymouse
Well duh, I know buncha liberals that live in their own little pockets of space time, unaffected by reality. Observable parallel universes even within the current timeline.
12
posted on
09/24/2007 4:17:50 PM PDT
by
farlander
(Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
To: anymouse
“bush-like branching structure”
I knew it had to be in there someplace...it’s all Bush’s fault...
13
posted on
09/24/2007 4:17:57 PM PDT
by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts...)
To: RightWhale
There is a thread exactly like this in a parallel universe.And a parallel universe for every permutation of your sentence.
Gonna be lots of parallel universes out there.
14
posted on
09/24/2007 4:19:05 PM PDT
by
Ole Okie
To: RightWhale
There is a thread exactly like this in a parallel universe.Well, kind of. Over there is a perfect employment rate, no taxes and Ronald Reagan is serving another term.
15
posted on
09/24/2007 4:21:55 PM PDT
by
InvisibleChurch
(Tempus Fidget - The time between the final hymn and recessional.)
To: anymouse
16
posted on
09/24/2007 4:21:56 PM PDT
by
Maceman
("If your enemy is angry, irritate him." -- Sun Tzu)
To: RightWhale
Love the way "universe" doesn't mean
everything anymore. They keep pushing it with "multi-verse", "theory-of-everything"....
In my universe, universe means everything and "parallel universe" is a terrible term.
To: Ole Okie
There are 2 x 10161 new ones every second and that's just your doing.
18
posted on
09/24/2007 4:22:18 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(25 degrees today. Phase state change accomplished.)
To: anymouse
Their Similarities Are Different
To: RightWhale
Yeah, except, in that universe, I posted something really smart.
20
posted on
09/24/2007 4:24:42 PM PDT
by
papasmurf
(I'm for Free, Fair, and Open trade. America needs to stand by it's true Friend. Israel.)
To: SteveMcKing
It’s meaning inflation. This is the worst period of meaning inflation since the Carter Admin. Actually the worst in recorded history. Actually the worst since the beginning of all time.
21
posted on
09/24/2007 4:24:49 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(25 degrees today. Phase state change accomplished.)
To: RightWhale
There is a thread exactly like this in a parallel universe. Except in that universe, I decided not to bother posting...
22
posted on
09/24/2007 4:25:12 PM PDT
by
Tanniker Smith
(I didn't know she was a Liberal when I married her.)
To: RightWhale
>There is a thread exactly like this in a parallel universe.
<
I’ll respond to that one...
23
posted on
09/24/2007 4:25:42 PM PDT
by
LRS
To: RightWhale
There is a thread exactly like this in a parallel universe. ....... which postulates that parallel universes DO NOT exist!!! /heheheheee
24
posted on
09/24/2007 4:26:15 PM PDT
by
Mr_Moonlight
(Sept 11 2001 ...... NEVER forget !)
To: anymouse
Parallel universes really do exist, according to a mathematical discovery by Oxford scientists described by one expert as "one of the most important developments in the history of science". Oh please, spare me the hyperbole.
No one has discovered anything, much less parallel universes. Someone has merely proposed a mathematical model to account for a result predicted by another mathematical model. Unfortunately, some scientists think their mathematics is more real than the real world.
To: anymouse
26
posted on
09/24/2007 4:26:46 PM PDT
by
GregoTX
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: anymouse
Parallel universes really do exist, according to a mathematical discovery by Oxford scientists described by one expert as "one of the most important developments in the history of science". And if the Feds would only grant us $100 billion of taxpayer money, we'd be all set.
Oh, BTW, these parallel universes only exist because of "global warming".
27
posted on
09/24/2007 4:27:14 PM PDT
by
michigander
(The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
To: anymouse
So I guess the problem now is how to insert an ensemble of states (i.e. instrumentation) into another space-time branch unobtrusively to collect data on other universes, and return to ours.
To: anymouse
According to this theory, a universe must exist, several, in fact, where Helen Thomas is considered a hottie. For that reason alone, the theory must be rejected as implausible.
29
posted on
09/24/2007 4:27:22 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(The 2nd Amendment isn't about sporting goods.)
To: anymouse
Better let Art Bell know about this...
30
posted on
09/24/2007 4:28:27 PM PDT
by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: Brilliant
It’s all but inevitable. All universes except 1/googleplex percent of them are screwed up.
31
posted on
09/24/2007 4:28:48 PM PDT
by
Erasmus
(My simplifying explanation had the disconcerting side effect of making the subject incomprehensible.)
To: anymouse
“Commenting in New Scientist magazine, Dr Andy Albrecht, a physicist at the University of California at Davis, said: “This work will go down as one of the most important developments in the history of science.””
And in another universe it won’t.
To: anymouse
This is very exiting.
Thanks for the post.
33
posted on
09/24/2007 4:29:15 PM PDT
by
papasmurf
(I'm for Free, Fair, and Open trade. America needs to stand by it's true Friend. Israel.)
To: anymouse
Now if we could only figure out how this universe worked it would be a whole lot easier to figure out how that there parallel thingy worked.
34
posted on
09/24/2007 4:30:03 PM PDT
by
Tarpon
To: anymouse
You mean, those young ladies I could have but didn’t....when I was young...Dang! Any word on “parallel universe travel”? On second thought...nevermind.
35
posted on
09/24/2007 4:30:31 PM PDT
by
SaxxonWoods
(...."We're the govt, and we're here to hurt."....)
To: anymouse
" US physicist Hugh Everett, mysteries of quantum mechanics explains Mitt Romney and the parallel theory."
36
posted on
09/24/2007 4:30:51 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Proud father of a 10th Mountain veteran. Proud son of a WWII vet. Proud brother of vets.)
To: anymouse
If this theory is correct, we would have to imagine a universe where the Clintons are honest. That is not scientifically possible. Therefore, I do not believe the parallel universe theory.
37
posted on
09/24/2007 4:31:00 PM PDT
by
puroresu
(Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations.)
To: anymouse
That really Stunes my Beeber!
38
posted on
09/24/2007 4:33:48 PM PDT
by
Bullish
( Reality is the best cure for delusion.)
To: anymouse
where is ockham’s razor when you need it?
39
posted on
09/24/2007 4:34:42 PM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
To: papasmurf
This is very exiting. In a parallel universe it might even be considered exciting, as well as hugh and series ......
40
posted on
09/24/2007 4:35:21 PM PDT
by
Mr_Moonlight
(There are no typos in a parallel universe, as well as many typos, or no typos at all ... you decide)
To: anymouse
Parallel universe is still just a theory...No evidence exists....
41
posted on
09/24/2007 4:36:16 PM PDT
by
TASMANIANRED
(TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
To: Logophile
Parallel universes really do exist, according to a mathematical discovery by Oxford scientists described by one expert as "one of the most important developments in the history of science".
Sounds like the Oxford D and D Dungeon Master has slipped the surly bonds of Reality and into the Realms of Make Believe.
Perhaps the power of the polyhedron dice are too much for mere mortal men
42
posted on
09/24/2007 4:36:33 PM PDT
by
RedMonqey
( The truth is never PC)
To: ari-freedom
Be careful with that razor. You might shave off some fresh parallel universe along with that whisker.
43
posted on
09/24/2007 4:36:34 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(25 degrees today. Phase state change accomplished.)
To: anymouse; Brilliant
...bush-like branching structure..... I knew it was Bush's fault!.........
44
posted on
09/24/2007 4:38:12 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(ALL that CARBON in ALL that oil & coal was once in the atmospere. We're just putting it back!)
To: ari-freedom
Ockham is shaving with it.
45
posted on
09/24/2007 4:38:24 PM PDT
by
TASMANIANRED
(TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
To: RightWhale
Just my luck to be in this Universe. I know in the parallel one I was rich, gook looking and was have my way with (fill in the space).
46
posted on
09/24/2007 4:39:32 PM PDT
by
Recon Dad
(Marine Spec Ops Dad)
To: TASMANIANRED
Sure there is proof, lots of it! Where do you think moonbats come from?
To: anymouse; willgolfforfood
If this is true, then why do I always have the unlucky circumstance of ending up in the screwed up universe? That is known as teheJohn Edwards Syndrome.........i see two universes.......
48
posted on
09/24/2007 4:39:56 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(ALL that CARBON in ALL that oil & coal was once in the atmospere. We're just putting it back!)
To: RightWhale
You can avoid that if you shave in the simplest possible way and therefore not create a parallel universe.
To do so, make sure you shave with an Occam’s razor.
To: Recon Dad
gook looking?........I’m offended!..............not rearry........
50
posted on
09/24/2007 4:41:45 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(ALL that CARBON in ALL that oil & coal was once in the atmospere. We're just putting it back!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson