That explains a few things that have happened over the last few years - we got forked in time. ;)
1 posted on
09/24/2007 4:10:43 PM PDT by
anymouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: anymouse
There is a thread exactly like this in a parallel universe.
2 posted on
09/24/2007 4:12:24 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(25 degrees today. Phase state change accomplished.)
To: timer
3 posted on
09/24/2007 4:12:39 PM PDT by
anymouse
To: anymouse
If this is true, then why do I always have the unlucky circumstance of ending up in the screwed up universe?
4 posted on
09/24/2007 4:13:26 PM PDT by
Brilliant
To: anymouse
Seems Dr. Bollinger (and many in academe) live in one.
To: anymouse
Well duh, I know buncha liberals that live in their own little pockets of space time, unaffected by reality. Observable parallel universes even within the current timeline.
12 posted on
09/24/2007 4:17:50 PM PDT by
farlander
(Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
To: anymouse
“bush-like branching structure”
I knew it had to be in there someplace...it’s all Bush’s fault...
13 posted on
09/24/2007 4:17:57 PM PDT by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts...)
To: anymouse
16 posted on
09/24/2007 4:21:56 PM PDT by
Maceman
("If your enemy is angry, irritate him." -- Sun Tzu)
To: anymouse
Their Similarities Are Different
To: anymouse
Parallel universes really do exist, according to a mathematical discovery by Oxford scientists described by one expert as "one of the most important developments in the history of science". Oh please, spare me the hyperbole.
No one has discovered anything, much less parallel universes. Someone has merely proposed a mathematical model to account for a result predicted by another mathematical model. Unfortunately, some scientists think their mathematics is more real than the real world.
To: anymouse
26 posted on
09/24/2007 4:26:46 PM PDT by
GregoTX
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: anymouse
Parallel universes really do exist, according to a mathematical discovery by Oxford scientists described by one expert as "one of the most important developments in the history of science". And if the Feds would only grant us $100 billion of taxpayer money, we'd be all set.
Oh, BTW, these parallel universes only exist because of "global warming".
27 posted on
09/24/2007 4:27:14 PM PDT by
michigander
(The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
To: anymouse
So I guess the problem now is how to insert an ensemble of states (i.e. instrumentation) into another space-time branch unobtrusively to collect data on other universes, and return to ours.
To: anymouse
According to this theory, a universe must exist, several, in fact, where Helen Thomas is considered a hottie. For that reason alone, the theory must be rejected as implausible.
29 posted on
09/24/2007 4:27:22 PM PDT by
Redcloak
(The 2nd Amendment isn't about sporting goods.)
To: anymouse
Better let Art Bell know about this...
30 posted on
09/24/2007 4:28:27 PM PDT by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: anymouse
“Commenting in New Scientist magazine, Dr Andy Albrecht, a physicist at the University of California at Davis, said: “This work will go down as one of the most important developments in the history of science.””
And in another universe it won’t.
To: anymouse
This is very exiting.
Thanks for the post.
33 posted on
09/24/2007 4:29:15 PM PDT by
papasmurf
(I'm for Free, Fair, and Open trade. America needs to stand by it's true Friend. Israel.)
To: anymouse
Now if we could only figure out how this universe worked it would be a whole lot easier to figure out how that there parallel thingy worked.
34 posted on
09/24/2007 4:30:03 PM PDT by
Tarpon
To: anymouse
You mean, those young ladies I could have but didn’t....when I was young...Dang! Any word on “parallel universe travel”? On second thought...nevermind.
35 posted on
09/24/2007 4:30:31 PM PDT by
SaxxonWoods
(...."We're the govt, and we're here to hurt."....)
To: anymouse
" US physicist Hugh Everett, mysteries of quantum mechanics explains Mitt Romney and the parallel theory."
36 posted on
09/24/2007 4:30:51 PM PDT by
ansel12
(Proud father of a 10th Mountain veteran. Proud son of a WWII vet. Proud brother of vets.)
To: anymouse
If this theory is correct, we would have to imagine a universe where the Clintons are honest. That is not scientifically possible. Therefore, I do not believe the parallel universe theory.
37 posted on
09/24/2007 4:31:00 PM PDT by
puroresu
(Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson