Posted on 09/27/2007 3:18:25 PM PDT by decimon
Yes, I work in records and research, but I tend to pull the records for people requesting them - I don’t read them - and the research I do is in the old records (lots of genealogy, etc)
Hate it when I have to look up words in yer posts......:o)
LOL! I did my whole thesis on antidentitism in Victorian England (and they remain antidentite to this day). I figure, use enough big words, and no one will fact-check!
Ecker is more a PR man than a trial lawyer. Ecker plea bargains and doesn’t go to trial often from what I hear.
Wife knew that Indiana county was the right county to pull the “He’s molesting the child” stunt. Thank God it didn’t work. If Dr. Yelenic were alive today, he likely would have been accused of molesting the boy several more time in the last 17 months. Wife knew that it was perfectly legal to do this. I for one feel that anybody that would do that to another human should burn for eternity.
He hated the Doctor because the Doctor had changed the divorce settlement the week prior to the murder. This flunky cop needed the Doctor to support him financially, and assumed that he hit the jackpot by hooking up with the wife. How was this Trooper going to keep buying babies from Guatemala for the wife? Them babies ain’t cheap.
To my knowledge, Pennsylvania does not allow cameras in the court room --- hence no 3-ring judicial soap operas or Lance Ito celebrity judges on Court TV from the Keystone State.
Whew. Some people will do anything for money.
Father have to right to see their kids in Indiana County even if they pay. It is stacked against them unless you can afford a lawyer. Very sad..
How is that false arrest? The subject isn't held against his will, he or she is asked to come down to the station "to talk", they show up under their own power, then get hit with the flim-flam.
It's not false arrest to lie to the subject of a criminal investigation.
Divorce lawyers ought to put a lid on that sort of nonsense. But they are kind of stuck, because of reporting requirements and so forth they might be liable if they failed to report it.
So the perjuring spouse is primarily responsible, and I can't disagree with you with regard to their ultimate destination (unless they repent, confess, make amends, and pay for their crime.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.