Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roamer_1
Nor would they want to be responsible for what is not in line with their principles.

But if they decided to stay home out of 'principle', they'll get a Democrat in the White House, which is even worse than any Republican they might reject out of principle. In a less precarious world, that might be ok, but there's WAY too much at stake. It's not abortion or homosexual marriage that is the major problem, it's standing virtually defenseless in the face of Islamic fundamentalism.

29 posted on 09/29/2007 9:51:38 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: SuziQ
which is even worse than any Republican they might reject out of principle.

It is the Republican RINOs currently in office that are responsible (not complicit, but responsible) for shamnesty, for Treaty of the Seas, and for the NAU. How can one say that the Democrats are "even worse"? Even if one could plausibly consider anything "worse" than loss of sovereignty, rewarding these bastards with election will only encourage them.

The only faction not complicit, indeed, the only faction in opposition even before the outcry of the people were the far right Conservatives. to support any other is to invite more of the same.

How soon we forget.

30 posted on 09/29/2007 10:15:17 PM PDT by roamer_1 (Vote for FrudyMcRomson -Turn red states purple in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson