Posted on 10/01/2007 6:24:38 AM PDT by presidio9
mark
>>Its not the weight of the evidence that is important. Its the seriousness of the charges.
Ah, that’s an old chestnut from 1991. It still makes me laugh to hear it. That, and the bit about “the inequities of power”.
What a blessing! Get the kid the book, Grammy!
Just a few lines about his early life, brought tears to my eyes. What an ascent he has made!
Fascinating read.
Excellent man; excellent interview.
Although the transcript doesn't identify them, the video showed Sharpton and others at that point in the interview.
Give him that book! As a homeschooled individual (whose parent was too), I can assure you that jumping into a book over one's head is not like jumping into water over one's head. He won't drown, he'll come out taller. :)
IF 60 Worthless Minutes treated him "fairly" I'd be surprised. Did they allude to their and the rest of the media's role in highlighing and prepetuating the "misperceptions" of this great man? I can't watch that propaganda myself.
Every now and then our country wins one, thank God.
I so believe America finally got a man this country deserves when Clarence Thomas became Justice Thomas. I have never doubted him; especially knowing who was behind keeping him off the bench.
I didn’t see it or read this in it’s entirety, so I’m left wondering if CBS admitted to the “High Tech Lynching” they performed on this great man?
Why would Thomas want to talk? It’s just opening the door to the hyenas.
True. Only a stupid liberal, or liberal organization like CBS, could believe this man that grew up in a dirt-floor shack and rose to SCJ, could only do so merely a result of affirmative action.
This made me sit up and take notice: "Asked if the Anita Hill that testified was the same Anita Hill he knew at the EEOC, Thomas says, "She was not the demure, religious, conservative person that they portrayed. That's not the person I knew." Makes the case for her manipulating for the cameras.
I'm glad Justice Thomas is willing to come out and defend his side.
I found the implied racism in the interviewer's questions appallinghis insistence that race should be the first thing Thomas thinks about himself. That's disgusting, and even if it were his journalistic "technique."
Hilarious screen name.
If you followed it at the time, it was pretty apparent that it was all about abortion. The left feminazis were the people who coached Hill and who created all of the PR fog that long weekend. It was raw politics at its ugliest.
It wasn't CBS, it was NPR, whose Court reporter Nina Totenberg was the person who revealed the leaked FBI report on Anita Hill. It was leaked to her by someone on the Senate Judiciary Committee.
HIs story reminds me of the autobiographies of George Washington Carver, who was born into slavery and yet became one of the most prominent American scientists, and also Booker T. Washington, founder of Tuskeegee Institute (now University), prominent philanthropist, guest at the White House and author of Up from Slavery (himself also having been born a slave).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.