Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop

Well, Huckabee is not an ardent supporter of the war so I doubt he’d let Hunter near it.

He supports amnesty so not a chance for Tancredo.

And even he isn’t nuts enough to add keyes to his cabinet.

I really don’t care what newt and a few of these people are peddling. I wasn’t desperate enough to demand newt get in, I’m not so desperate I’d support Huckabee.

Give me one good reason I should. Even on the issue of social conservatism, my guess is that we’re world’s apart. on Judges. based on his love of government, I think it’s fair to deduce he wouldn’t look for a Justice like Thomas...he’s look for the right’s equivalent of Ginsberg. I don’t want activists on the court on left or right.

I have not fought republicans these last few years to a) elect a Republican speaking out against the war b) elect a Republican endorsing amnesty or ) elect a Republican that would look for more of an activist judge them another Thomas.

Three strikes...he’s out. This social conservative just says no.


15 posted on 10/01/2007 10:46:11 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (A government that’s big enough to do everything for us is powerful enough to do anything to us.- F.T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Soul Seeker
Well, Fred has been heard saying that he doesn’t understand why we are in Iraq!

For once Newt is right, and Huckabee is my first choice, but I will probably hold my nose and vote for Fred Thompson.

32 posted on 10/02/2007 2:48:12 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson