Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All; BykrBayb; bjs1779; floriduh voter; Tajitaw
In odd coincidence, I have just returned as all know from a conference sponsored in part by the University of Louisville, where a great tribute was made to T'wit. This is not related in any way I can tell, and involves good old Living Wills. Perhaps one or more attended our lectures, centered around the works of Wendell Berry. Or, perhaps not. Anyway, I remind once more of the better alternative, the Will to Live...

And, I think it is completely coincidence. Our bunch wasn't much into humanism. LOL.

The new edition of "Planning for Uncertainty: Living Wills and Other Advance Directives for You and Your Family" (The Johns Hopkins University Press, $40 hardcover; $18.95 paperback). It was written by Doukas, who is the University of Louisville's William Ray Moore Endowed Chair of Family Medicine and Medical Humanism, and Dr. William Reichel, a Georgetown University affiliated scholar.

Doukas said adults need to be thinking about end-of-life issues, whether they're 21 or much older.

"You should document your values, you should document your preferences," Doukas said. "You should do this if you're an adult, period, because anybody can have an accident or a sudden illness."

Relatively young women, such as Terri Schiavo, Karen Ann Quinlan and Nancy Beth Cruzan, have become the subject of high-profile court battles after becoming incapacitated, he notes.

Are you prepared for death or incapacity? Louisville authors address living wills

8mm

330 posted on 10/25/2007 4:03:16 AM PDT by 8mmMauser (Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]


To: All
Just ask a leftie. He is sure to tell you the right to kill as in Mikey and O.J. is right there in the Constitution, shown clearly following the white-out. He is sure to set you straight twisted.

Please note: This is neither satire nor humor. The leftie actually passes it off as thought.

For instance: In July. Christians disrupted a Hindu priest as he led the U.S. Senate in prayer. Ms. Gray might argue that we are a Christian country, but I checked the U.S. Constitution. Sure enough, Article I states, "Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion …" The founding fathers placed no adjective in front of the word "religion" because they wished to promote religious tolerance.

Whatever happened to, "Love thy neighbor"? In 2005, conservative Christians led by then-Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, Sen. Rick Santorum, then-House Majority Leader Tom DeLay and President Bush, sought to use the powers of the federal government to deny Michael Schiavo his right to allow his severely brain-damaged wife, Terri, to die. The courts intervened, the machines were disconnected and Terri died. Doctors determined that her brain had deteriorated to half of its normal weight and she would never recover. How Christian was it to prolong this existence?

Conservative Christians continue to deny others the benefits of stem-cell research. They argue that fertilized eggs would be destroyed in such research, thus killing the lives within. Yet researchers would use only those eggs designated for disposal anyway. I find it curious that no Christian has offered to save a single egg by having it implanted in a paid surrogate, who would raise the fetus to term, and then adopt the baby; nor has legislation been introduced making the disposal of fertilized eggs a crime equivalent to murder.

Some Christians try to deny rights

8mm

331 posted on 10/25/2007 4:12:59 AM PDT by 8mmMauser (Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson