Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Durham Bull
Campus Report ^ | October 2, 2007 | Mal Kline

Posted on 10/02/2007 1:20:50 PM PDT by bs9021

Durham Bull

by: Malcolm A. Kline, October 02, 2007

Everything that is wrong with higher education, and, for that matter, most major media, was on stunning display for the past two years as the district attorney in Durham, North Carolina attempted to prosecute a bogus rape case against three Duke lacrosse players. All of the figures of authority at Duke who could have set the record straight and ended the persecution of a trio of lacrosse players tilted to the side of the ethically challenged DA.

That record is laid out to a fare-thee-well in the book Until Proven Innocent by Stuart Taylor Jr. and K. C. Johnson. Taylor, a reporter for the National Journal, and Johnson, a history professor at Brooklyn College, lay out the evidence on the case and show that, even before the DA reluctantly admitted that the player’s DNA did not match anything found on their accuser, nearly everything that we were told about the case was wrong.

For, example, when the state attorney general finally declared the lads innocent, the academic and media figures who aided and abetted Durham DA Mike Nifong continued to insist that the former suspects were “no choir boys.” A reporter from the Christian Science Monitor tried to push this one on me in an interview in which he questioned yours truly about the aftermath of the controversy.

As it turns out, compared to their peers, these Duke students lived a nearly monastic existence. “They studied hard,” the authors note. “They got good grades, among the best of any other lacrosse team in the Atlantic Coast conference.”

(Excerpt) Read more at campusreportonline.net ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: North Carolina; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: duke; lacrosse; scandal; stripper

1 posted on 10/02/2007 1:20:55 PM PDT by bs9021
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bs9021

bttt


2 posted on 10/02/2007 1:26:44 PM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

87 Duke faculty members have not apologized. Duke’s president is still drawing a paycheck. The Trustees are still in their oversight role at the university.


3 posted on 10/02/2007 1:44:04 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

And my daughter, who will be applying to a number of fine schools for admission next year, will not be applying to Duke, in part because of the conduct of the “Duke 87” and the pusilanimous response of the Duke administration to that conduct. Actions have consequences.


4 posted on 10/02/2007 3:05:30 PM PDT by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: p. henry
I sell to a Duke MBA. She is devastated.
5 posted on 10/02/2007 7:42:05 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

“these Duke students lived a nearly monastic existence”

Monks hire crack whores for entertainment?


6 posted on 10/02/2007 7:46:30 PM PDT by Oystir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: p. henry

As bad as Duke faculty are, the city of Durham is even worse. I wouldn’t even drive through Durham much less send my daughter to live there. Good decision on your part!


7 posted on 10/02/2007 7:52:48 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson