Skip to comments.Who has the "Stop Rudy" ping list? (vanity)
Posted on 10/03/2007 9:24:57 AM PDT by TitansAFC
click here to read article
I hope you will work as hard to stop Hillary if he becomes the nominee...
The question becomes: Do I want to lose just the election, which is already then lost, or lose both the election and a Conservative political party?
In which case, the logical choice for a Conservative is to accept 2008 as a lost election, and work to rebuild the party.
What is the point in stopping her if Rudy is the GOP nominee?
If she allows the Conservative party to exist.
Then it will just become, “the Party.”
Are you guys even Conservatives? Alas, the opposite is probably self-evident....
Why would I work to aid and abet a liberal takeover of the GOP? Why would I not want that takeover attempt to end - mercifully - in November of 2008 instead?
It is a Conservative’s responsibility not to aide and abet a Liberal takeover of the GOP.
This is absurd. I’m too socially conservative to vote for Rudy over Thompson, McCain, Romney, or even Huckabee, but going after Rudy’s knees is ridiculous. He has a right to run in the GOP primary and people have a right to support him. I may not like his personal life and pro-gay, pro-abort stances, but if it comes down to him or the Hildebeast, I’ll be working overtime to defeat her.
Are you KIDDING me? Please tell me that this is a joke. If you cannot tell the difference between Hillary Rodham CLinton and Rudolph Guiliani, there's no help for you.
That said - my #1 choice is Fred Thompson right now but I WILL say that if Rudy gets the nomination I will be damned sure to make sure he WINS over every single Democrat...especially that Communist Hillary!!
Her operatives are probably organizing a bunch of them now. Bull Moose, anyone?
I’d be glad to vote for Rudy.
He won't have to work...conservatives will immediately bolt the GOP and vote 3rd party.
You should also change your tagline, because Rudy won't be the nominee.
Then you would willingly aid and abet a Liberal coup of the GOP in addition to the already, then lost, election?
That is the antithesis of forwarding the Conservative movement. I will have no part in making 2008 worse in a Rudy911 vs. Hitlery matchup. I will accept that a Liberal must be President, and work to salvage the GOP for four years. The alternative is unthinkable.
I am not voting a pro-abortion person into the White House. If one is going to sit in that office they will do so without my vote.
I'll be voting 3rd party. I have no intention of helping Rudy should he get the nomination.
That is the stupidest remark I've read yet about the '08 election...go back to the DU-DailyKos-or where ever you've been.
"This is the lesson: never give in, never give in, never, never, never, neverin nothing, great or small, large or pettynever give in except to convictions of honor and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy." Sir Winston Churchill
Rudy would be fine with me....
Romney would be better.....
maybe Fred would be the best - but, he has a lot of catch-up to do....
It strange that so many FReepers are willing to give Hillary the WhiteHouse, just for spite.....under the pretence that Hillary is no worse........
By all means, bash Rudy now. But in the general election, think of who 0sama would support.
Don't you think telling a guy who won't vote for a very liberal candidate to go to DU is a tad ironic?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.