To: Ol' Sparky
...liberalism had advanced more under George W. Bush than it ever did under Bill Clinton...
Who did Bill Clinton nominate to the SC and who did Bush nominate? Are you saying you'd rather have Clinton than Bush if you were able to choose between the two???
There is no difference in the judges we're going to get from Clinton or Giuliani. Giuliani appointed liberal judges by an 8-1 margins in New York. He would be dealing with a Democratic Senate who would have veto power over any nominee he chooses. Given that, there is no chance Giuliani will do anything but give the Democrats a nominee they find acceptable, which would be a liberal justices
The only way to get conservative judges on the court is to nomination a conservative President that has a desire to appoint conservative justices to the courts.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson