Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ol' Sparky
...liberalism had advanced more under George W. Bush than it ever did under Bill Clinton...

Who did Bill Clinton nominate to the SC and who did Bush nominate? Are you saying you'd rather have Clinton than Bush if you were able to choose between the two???

410 posted on 10/04/2007 7:09:22 PM PDT by Proudcongal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]


To: Proudcongal
There is no difference in the judges we're going to get from Clinton or Giuliani. Giuliani appointed liberal judges by an 8-1 margins in New York. He would be dealing with a Democratic Senate who would have veto power over any nominee he chooses. Given that, there is no chance Giuliani will do anything but give the Democrats a nominee they find acceptable, which would be a liberal justices

The only way to get conservative judges on the court is to nomination a conservative President that has a desire to appoint conservative justices to the courts.

432 posted on 10/04/2007 9:13:28 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson